Trending Topic

3d illustration of human body liver
12 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Allan A Lima Pereira, Gabriel Lenz, Tiago Biachi de Castria

Despite being considered a rare type of malignancy, constituting only 3% of all gastrointestinal cancers, the incidence of biliary tract cancers (BTCs) has been increasing worldwide in recent years, with about 20,000 new cases annually only in the USA.1–3 These cancers arise from the biliary epithelium of the small ducts in the periphery of the liver […]

Matthew Goetz, ESMO 2022: MONARCH 3 trial – Interim overall survival results of abemaciclib + NSAI in patients with HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Published Online: Sep 14th 2022

The MONARCH 3 trial led to abemaciclib plus nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor approval as initial therapy in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer with significant improvement in progression-free survival. Prof. Matthew Goetz (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA) joins touchONCOLOGY to discuss what the MONARCH 3 study teach us about the efficacy and safety of abemaciclib plus NSAI in patients with HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer, the clinical impacts of the availability of abemaciclib, and the results of the interim overall survival analysis.

The abstract entitled ‘MONARCH 3: Interim overall survival (OS) results of abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) in patients (pts) with HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC)‘ Abstract LBA5, was presented at European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2022.

Questions:

  1. What did the MONARCH 3 study teach us about the efficacy and safety of abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) in patients with HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC)? (0:13)
  2. What has been the clinical impact of the availability of abemaciclib? (1:27)
  3. What were the results of the interim overall survival analysis? (2:27)
  4. Why do you think these findings failed to achieve statistical significance? (3:31)
  5. What further study is needed to optimise the clinical use of abemaciclib in ABC? (3:59)

Disclosures: Matthew P. Goetz serves as a paid consultant and receives grants for research funding paid to his institution from Eli Lilly and Company in support of the MONARCH 3 trial; reports personal fees from Genomic Health; consulting fees to his institution from AstraZeneca, Biovica, Pfizer, Novartis, Sermonix, Context Pharm, Eagle Pharmaceuticals; grants to his institution from Pfizer, Sermonix; honoraria to his institution for serving on the advisory board for ARC Therapeutics, Blueprint Medicines, Biotheranostics, and Sanofi Genzyme; personal fees from Research to Practice, Clinical Education Alliance, Medscape, MJH Life Sciences for CME presentations; and personal fees from Total Health Conferencing serving as a panelist, outside the submitted work.

Support: Interview and filming supported by Touch Medical Media Ltd. Interview conducted by Katey Gabrysch.

Filmed in coverage of ESMO 2022

Access more breast cancer content here

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Close Popup