Trending Topic

3 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked

It is with great pleasure that we present the latest edition of touchREVIEWS in Oncology & Haematology. This issue highlights the remarkable progress and innovation shaping the fields of oncology and haematology, featuring articles that delve into both emerging therapies and the evolving understanding of complex malignancies. We open with an editorial by Mohammad Ammad […]

Cancer Nursing Deserves Better Recognition

Daniel Kelly
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Published Online: Jul 18th 2019 European Oncology & Haematology, 2019:15(1):19–20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17925/EOH.2019.15.1.19
Select a Section…
1

Abstract

Overview

Cancer nurses are responsible for the care and safety of patients at all stages of their illness, and are increasingly involved in complex procedures, including chemotherapy administration and prescribing. Increased access to health information online raises the expectations of patients and families. Together with the rising incidence of cancer, this raises the expectations placed on cancer nurses. However, contribution of cancer nurses has been under-recognised. Increased recognition plus access to education and an improved career structure are needed to maintain high standards of cancer care.

Keywords

Cancer nursing, prescribing, RECaN, quality of life, supportive care

2

Article

Cancer is a growing problem that demands the best from all sectors of the global health workforce.1 Cancer nurses make up the largest proportion of this workforce and, as well as being responsible for direct care delivery, also aim to address the unmet needs of patients and carers, such as the management of side-effects. Nurses care for cancer patients at all stages of the illness and are increasingly responsible for ensuring the safety of patients. However, their contribution is not always being recognised.2

At present, many cancer treatments are delivered on a day-care basis. This situation presents specific challenges in terms of how best to provide support and education to patients about staying as well as possible or coping with treatment-related side effects. Nurses carry out assessments of patient needs from the point of diagnosis onwards and, in some countries, are also taking on clinical roles previously undertaken by medical staff and building these into the total nursing care package. The scope of cancer nursing practice is expanding at a rapid pace, and the co-ordination of cancer treatment is now a major component of the nurse’s role that may reveal unmet needs and prompt them to suggest innovative solutions.3

In some health systems, cancer nurses are increasingly involved in extended practice roles that include nurse-led cancer follow-up clinics, endoscopy, colonoscopy and bone marrow aspiration, as well as chemotherapy administration, peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line insertion and removal, treatment follow-up, rehabilitation and co-ordination of end-of-life care. Prescribing is also a routine aspect of the cancer nursing role in some countries.4 Despite these developments, cancer nurses lack recognition (especially in terms of salary or career opportunities) for the part they play in enhancing patient experience, reducing costs and improving outcomes for people living with a diagnosis of cancer.5

The rising incidence of cancer places expectations on all health professionals to deliver care that is evidence-based but also reflects the rising expectations of patients and families. Information about cancer is more freely available on the Internet than ever before and patients and families are now less likely to accept treatment or care of a mediocre or poor quality. Better recognition of the current contribution, and future potential, of cancer nurses, is thus part of the solution to help provide better quality cancer services in the future.6

The European Oncology Nursing Society (www.cancernurse.eu) has recently been lobbying for better recognition of cancer nursing across Europe. Through the RECaN (Recognising European Cancer Nursing) project we have carried out a systematic review of published clinical trials that were led by cancer nurses. We also carried out comparative case studies about the status of cancer nursing in four European countries.7 Our systematic review revealed that cancer nurses have designed innovative interventions and have conducted clinical trials to investigate whether they are of benefit. The review included 152 trials that had measured cancer-specific quality of life as well as symptom control. We found evidence of benefit from cancer nursing interventions across all domains of quality of life as well as for symptoms that included pain, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, constipation and psychological morbidity.

These were important findings as nurses are often closely involved in the assessment and management of these troublesome symptoms with patients. Their close proximity to the patient may explain the types of trials that nurses were interested in. The RECaN project was pan-European and involved nurse researchers from several countries.It suggests that further international collaborations would be worthwhile to understand the contributions made by cancer nurses in terms of clinical innovation and care improvements.

The case for recognising the potential of specialist cancer nurses is growing.9 In some countries this process is already moving forward, but in others there is still a very long way to go. There is a need for appropriate levels of education for cancer nurses as well as a career structure that will help in recruiting and retaining motivated nurses in the cancer workforce where they are most needed. Without this it will not be possible to meet the needs of the rising numbers of people being diagnosed with cancer who expect, and deserve, the highest quality of cancer care. 

2

References

 

  • World Health Organization. Cancer: Key facts. 2018. Available at: www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en/ (accessed 8 January 2019).
  • Kelly D, Charalambous A. Recognising the impact and future potential of cancer nursing: The RECaN project and beyond. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2017;28:A1–2.
  • Macmillan Cancer Support. Excellence in cancer care: the contribution of the Clinical Nurse Specialist. National Cancer Action Team report. 2010. Available at: www.macmillan.org.uk/documents/aboutus/commissioners/excellenceincancercarethecontributionoftheclinicalnurse specialist.pdf (accessed 7 January 2019).
  • Scullin P, Devlin O, Forde C. Improving the safety of chemotherapy prescribing in oncology through the introduction of an assessment proforma. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2018;6:u216501.w7906.
  • European Cancer Organisation. Position statement on the value of specialist cancer nurses. 2017. Available at: www.oeci.eu/Attachments/ECCO_position_paper_Value_of_Specialised_Cancer_Nursing_
    FINAL.pdf
     (accessed 1 March 2019).
  • Cancer Research UK. Full team ahead: understanding the UK non-surgical cancer treatment workforce. 2017. Available at: www.cancerresearchuk.org/sites/default/files/full_team_ahead-exec_summary.pdf (accessed 1 March 2019).
  • Campbell P, Torrens C, Kelly D, et al. Recognizing European cancer nursing: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence of effectiveness and value of cancer nursing. J Adv Nurs. 2017;73:3144–53.
  • European Oncology Nursing Society. RECaN – Gathering evidence on the status of cancer nursing. Available at: www.cancernurse.eu/research/recan.html (accessed 2 July 2019).
  • Buchan J, Charlesworth A, Gershlick B. A critical moment: NHS staffing trends, retention and attrition. Health Foundation, London, 2019. Available at: www.health.org.uk/publications/reports/a-critical-moment (Accessed 10 July 2019).

 

3

Article Information

Disclosure

Professor Kelly has no conflicts of interest to declare in relation to this article.

Compliance With Ethics

This article is an opinion piece and does not report on new clinical data, or any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Review Process

This article is a short opinion piece and has not been submitted to external peer reviewers.

Authorship

The named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship of this manuscript, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given final approval for the version to be published.

Correspondence

Professor Daniel Kelly, Chair of Nursing Research, Royal College of Nursing, School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Eastgate House, Newport Road, Cardiff, CF240AB, UK. E: KellyDM@cardiff.ac.uk

Support

No funding was received for the publication of this article.

Received

2019-02-25

4

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Close Popup