Specialities

Specialities

Bladder Cancer
Breast Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
COVID-19
Dermatological Cancers
Diagnostics and Screening
Gastrointestinal Cancers
Genitourinary Cancer
Gynaecological Cancers
Haematological Malignancies
Haematology
Head and Neck Cancer
Immunotherapy
Leukaemia
Lung Cancer
Lymphoma
Multiple Myeloma
Endocrine Cancers
Ovarian Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer
Paediatric Oncology
Policy
Prostate Cancer
Renal Cancer
Sarcoma
Supportive Cancer Care
Soft Tissue Tumours
Neuro-oncology
Radiology
Radiotherapy
Rare Diseases
Search

Trending Topic
3 mins

Trending Topic
Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked

Foreword – touchREVIEWS in Oncology & Haematology, Volume 20, Issue 2, 2024

It is with great pleasure that we present the latest edition of touchREVIEWS in Oncology & Haematology. This issue highlights the remarkable progress and innovation shaping the fields of oncology and haematology, featuring articles that delve into both emerging therapies and the evolving understanding of complex malignancies. We open with an editorial by Mohammad Ammad […]

Connect With Us:

Facebook
X (Twitter)
Instagram
Youtube
Linkedin
Multiple Myeloma
19 mins

Oral Therapies for Multiple Myeloma

Sachi Singhal, Shaji K Kumar
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Published Online: May 23rd 2022 touchREVIEWS in Oncology & Haematology. 2022;18(2):139-51 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17925/OHR.2022.18.2.139
Select a Section…
1

Abstract

Overview

Multiple myeloma is a haematological cancer that needs continuous long-term management for improved outcomes and survival. Over the last few decades, medical therapies for myeloma have improved considerably, with several new drug classes becoming available. Oral therapies, especially when used in combinations, are more convenient than intravenous therapies, and limit the number of clinic visits. Oral therapies include thalidomide, lenalidomide, pomalidomide, ixazomib, panobinostat, selinexor, venetoclax, melphalan and cyclophosphamide. Cytopenias were the most common adverse events with the immunomodulatory drugs panobinostat, selinexor and venetoclax, while skin rash was seen commonly with ixazomib and lenalidomide. Oral regimens are imperative during a global pandemic and can be managed over telemedicine visits rather than outpatient infusions and injections, reducing the risk of exposure and infection. It is important that patients monitor their side effects and report them to their healthcare providers at the earliest opportunity. We review available oral regimens and their combinations for effective management of myeloma.

Keywords

Multiple myeloma, oral therapies, immunomodulatory drugs, ixazomib, panobinostat, selinexor, venetoclax, alkylating agents, adverse effects, efficacy

2

Article

Treatment options for myeloma have rapidly expanded in the past decade and, as with many cancers, the number of oral drug options has increased considerably. Given the more limited number of cancer hospitals, patients often must travel considerable distance to get to their closest cancer centre, which places a significant burden on receiving adequate therapy. While most historical cancer therapies were parenteral, increasing availability of oral drugs has reduced the need for frequent hospital visits. Fewer hospital visits can improve quality of life, reduce out-of-pocket travel expenses, which are often not reimbursed by healthcare plans, and potentially reduce risk of infections.1 This review focuses on the currently available oral therapies for myeloma, their efficacy and safety, and the different combinations that have been studied in clinical trials. We discuss oral therapies for multiple myeloma (MM), including immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) thalidomide, lenalidomide and pomalidomide; the proteosome inhibitor ixazomib; the histone deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat; and newly available drugs selinexor and venetoclax. The historical standard of care, cyclophosphamide and melphalan-based therapies, and their currently used regimens are also discussed, followed by current data from trials on each drug alone or with dexamethasone. Finally, all-oral combination regimens of these therapies are summarized. Table 1 shows the efficacy of therapies taken alone or in combination with dexamethasone.2–32 Table 2 shows all the oral combinations for treating MM.33–39 Table 3 displays the rates of adverse events (AEs) in the trials of oral medications for MM.40–83

Immunomodulatory drugs

Thalidomide was the first drug in this class and was introduced for treatment of myeloma in 1999.84 Since then, it has been studied in various combinations in different disease stages. Thalidomide was followed by lenalidomide and pomalidomide, with all three differing in efficacy and toxicity profiles.85 This class of drugs remains the backbone of many of the regimens currently used in the clinic.

Thalidomide

Clinical efficacy

Thalidomide has been used alone,86 but most of the efficacy data relate to steroid combinations, as is the case with most of the myeloma therapies.49,87,88 The response rates to thalidomide and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed and relapsed disease are shown in Table 1.

Dose and schedule

Thalidomide has been used at doses ranging from 50 mg daily to 800 mg daily, but most patients will not tolerate doses above 200 mg/day, with the drug given without a break. In most situations, it can be started at 100 mg daily, and then escalated if needed to 200 mg daily. It can be combined with 40 mg weekly of dexamethasone.40

Side effects

Somnolence, neuropathy and constipation are the most common adverse effects associated with thalidomide, and have been uniformly observed in all studies. Patients often become tolerant to some of these effects, such as the somnolence and constipation; however, other effects, such as the neuropathy, can be progressive if the drug is not discontinued or its dose reduced. Other less common side effects include bradycardia, venous thromboembolism, severe skin reactions such as toxic epidermal necrolysis, thyroid dysfunction and elevated liver enzymes.40 The safety profile of thalidomide has been summarized in Table 3.

Venous thrombosis: Nearly 10% of patients with MM develop deep vein thrombosis (DVT) when treated with chemotherapy alone; however, the incidence is much higher when chemotherapy is combined with thalidomide (28%).89 The risk was highest in patients with acquired protein C resistance on thalidomide, in absence of factor V Leiden mutation (50%).89 Patients treated with thalidomide at first line are generally at higher risk than those in the relapsed/refractory setting.43 Patients treated with thalidomide also have an increased risk of arterial thromboembolism, including myocardial infarctions and cerebrovascular accidents.90 Also of note, concurrent use of oral contraceptives with thalidomide/dexamethasone combination can have additive effects on risk of thromboembolism, and contraception should be picked carefully before initiation of this therapy.40

Thromboprophylaxis is not routinely recommended for patients receiving single-agent or maintenance thalidomide, but is strongly recommended for patients receiving thalidomide with high-dose dexamethasone or chemotherapy.42 The International Myeloma Working Group guidelines specifically address thromboembolism in patients with myeloma treated with IMiDs, and recommend thromboprophylaxis especially for patients taking IMiDs in combinations.91

Venous thrombosis (VTE) risk factors can be classified into three categories: patient-related, disease-related or treatment-related. Most guidelines recommend aspirin in patients with no or one risk factor, while those with two or more risk factors should be placed on low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or full-dose warfarin.43,91–93 However, other novel options like direct oral anti-coagulants, such as apixaban, are an attractive option, as they are administered orally with fixed daily dosing, which is much more convenient than the subcutaneous dosing of LMWH and the frequent monitoring required with warfarin therapy.94

Dermatological manifestations: Although rashes and minor exfoliation are seen in 20–25% of patients with myeloma receiving thalidomide, toxic epidermal necrolysis has been reported only rarely.95 Patients taking thalidomide in combination with dexamethasone had a higher incidence of severe reactions than those taking thalidomide alone (4% versus 19%, respectively).44 Most skin rashes occurred during the first month of treatment; however, late-onset rashes were reported up to 4 months after starting therapy.44 Patients who develop a rash should have their treatment held, then reinstated at a lower dose once the rash subsides. If the rash recurs, then the drug should be discontinued.

Hypothyroidism: Subclinical hypothyroidism occurred commonly in patients with MM who were treated with thalidomide.56,96 Consequently, it may contribute to the adverse effects seen with thalidomide, including fatigue, constipation, neuropathy and bradycardia.96 While overt hypothyroidism is uncommon, early symptoms are often overlooked as thalidomide itself also causes fatigue.96 Checking thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels every 3–6 months in patients receiving thalidomide, and providing thyroid hormone replacement if this complication occurs is prudent when using thalidomide in patients with MM.

Teratogenicity: Teratogenicity is the most publicized adverse effect of thalidomide. It causes phocomelia and is frequently associated with malformations of inner organs.97 Mortality at birth or shortly after has been reported in about 40% of infants whose mother was treated with thalidomide.97,98 Therefore, pregnancy is an absolute contraindication, and a negative pregnancy test is required before starting IMiD therapy in women of childbearing potential. Contraception should be maintained throughout the duration of therapy.

Somnolence: Somnolence during thalidomide treatment is common, and patients should be warned about driving or operating heavy machinery. An evening dosing strategy minimizes somnolence, and the effect reduces with use.2

Constipation: Constipation is another common side effect of thalidomide, and pre-emptive laxatives are highly recommended.2

Peripheral neuropathy: This manifests mainly as sensory neuropathy, or neuropathic pain, and is one of the most commonly seen side effects with thalidomide. A complete neurological exam is imperative on each clinic visit to screen for signs of peripheral neuropathies. Dose reductions can be considered if symptoms worsen when peripheral neuropathy is mild grade (1 or 2). Dose interruptions are also a preferable line of management in cases of grade 2 peripheral neuropathy. The patient can be rechallenged with thalidomide after assessing an individual risk/benefit ratio. Grade 3 and 4 neuropathy warrant complete discontinuation of thalidomide. All cases of neuropathy are not reversible.40,87

Monitoring for patients on thalidomide includes:87

  • Complete blood count,
  • Signs and symptoms of DVT/pulmonary embolism (PE): dyspnoea,
    leg swelling, chest pain,
  • International normalized ratio if patient is on warfarin for thromboprophylaxis,
  • TSH levels every 3–6 months,
  • Negative pregnancy test before initiating therapy in women of childbearing potential,
  • Complete neurological exam on each visit to monitor for peripheral neuropathy.

Lenalidomide

Lenalidomide is the second drug of this class to be approved for use in patients with myeloma. It is currently used alone as maintenance therapy after autologous stem-cell transplant (ASCT) in patients with standard-risk, becoming a new benchmark for survival.99 Most of its efficacy data come from combinations with dexamethasone in both newly diagnosed patients and patients with relapsed MM, as shown in Table 1.

Dose and schedule64

Lenalidomide has been used in doses ranging from 10 mg daily to 25 mg daily, though most common is 25 mg daily for 21 days every 28 days in patients with myeloma.64 For maintenance, 10–15 mg/day is used until progression.99 It is typically combined with dexamethasone 40 mg weekly. In this combination, it is active and well tolerated in patients with newly diagnosed MM.95 It is the backbone of many triplet therapies, as given in Table 2.

Side effects

While chemically related to thalidomide, lenalidomide’s efficacy and toxicity profile differ significantly from thalidomide. Although it produces a similar or higher rate of cytopenias than thalidomide, the risk of neuropathy is much lower.44,46,57,60 The safety profile of lenalidomide has been summarized in Table 3. Severe adverse drug reactions are rare,
if any occur.44,57,87

Cytopenias: Lenalidomide-induced neutropenia should always be considered, because neutropenia is one of the most frequent side effects of lenalidomide.57 If absolute neutrophil count (ANC) decreases to <1,000/mm3, lenalidomide should be interrupted and ANC monitored weekly. Upon recovery, lenalidomide can be resumed at the previous dose if neutropenia is the only toxicity, or at the next lowest dose if there are other toxicities. For each subsequent decrease to <1,000/mm3, lenalidomide should be interrupted and resumed at the next lowest dose upon recovery.64 Dose interruptions or reductions are needed if platelets fall below 30,000/mm3. Platelet transfusions are rarely required and reserved for those with bleeding.64 Management with dose reductions or interruptions may be needed, and in some cases, use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) may
be necessary.100,101

VTE: Although slightly lower than thalidomide, the risk of VTE with lenalidomide use in patients with MM is significant, especially with dexamethasone and alkylating agents.57,60 It is recommended to continue patients on lenalidomide on thromboprophylaxis (with LMWH or adjusted-dose warfarin) or daily aspirin, as per risk stratification of the individual patient.50,59,91

Teratogenicity: Much like thalidomide, lenalidomide is also a drug of high teratogenic potential, and is contraindicated in women of childbearing potential without effective contraception and thorough discussion prior to initiation of drug.64

Monitoring for patients on lenalidomide includes:64

  • Regular blood counts should be performed: weekly for first 2–3 cycles, and every 4 weeks thereafter once the trends are stable.
  • Patients with neutropenia should be monitored for signs of infection, and those with thrombocytopenias for signs of bleeding, epistaxis, mucocutaneouspetechiae, etc. See above for dose changes for the same.
  • Signs and symptoms of DVT/PE are the following: dyspnoea, leg swelling, chest pain.
  • Pregnancy testing: obtain two negative pregnancy tests before starting lenalidomide – one 10–14 days prior to starting and the second 24 hours prior to starting. Pregnancy tests should be performed monthly thereafter in women with regular menstrual cycles and every 2 weeks in women with irregular menstrual cycles.102

Pomalidomide

Pomalidomide is the third IMiD to be introduced, which, in combination with dexamethasone, is active in patients with relapsed/refractory MM.85 Pomalidomide with low-dose dexamethasone can be used in lenalidomide- and bortezomib-refractory myeloma, and is well tolerated.102 It has a much more potent anti-myeloma effect than thalidomide or lenalidomide, with a different safety profile.85

Dose and schedule

Pomalidomide has been used at doses ranging from 2 mg daily to 4 mg daily in patients with relapsed/refractory MM. The recommended starting dose is 4 mg daily for 21 days of a 28-day cycle, but 1 mg, 2 mg and 3 mg doses are available for dose modification.103 It can be combined with dexamethasone 40 mg weekly.11

Side effects

Given the high disease burden, residual effects of prior treatments and comorbidities, patients with relapsed/refractory MM are susceptible to treatment-related AEs.104 In clinical trials, the rates of DVT and PE were low due to patients receiving thromboprophylaxis (2.0–3.1%);13–15 but other treatment‐emergent AEs most commonly leading to dose reductions of pomalidomide are neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and infections.15 Its safety profile is highly favourable, with mainly haematological toxicities that can be easily managed.105 The adverse drug reactions are summarized in Table 3.

Cytopenias: Depending on its severity, neutropenia can be managed with dose interruptions, dose modifications and/or growth-factor support. granulocyte colony-stimulating factor therapy can be administered to patients experiencing neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. Anti-infective agents can be used in patients with infections or febrile neutropenia.62,106 Thrombocytopenia is managed with dose interruptions if platelets fall below 25,000/mm3. Upon recovery of platelets, dosing should be resumed at the next lowest dose. For each subsequent drop to <30,000/mm3, pomalidomide should be interrupted and resumed at 1 mg less than previous dose upon recovery.103 Dose interruptions are also recommended if ANC drops below 500/mm3.103

Infections: Antibiotic prophylaxis can be considered for patients receiving pomalidomide, especially in the first months after starting treatment, when risk of infection is highest.107 For patients with very high risk of infection (low blood counts, history of infection or both), consider prophylaxis for the entire duration of therapy.62,106 Routine vaccinations and prophylactic vaccinations are recommended against influenza A and B virus, pneumococci and Haemophilus influenzae in all patients with MM.107

As pomalidomide is structurally related to thalidomide, it is expected to have a teratogenic effect, and is contraindicated in pregnancy.103

Monitoring for patients on pomalidomide includes:

  • Weekly complete blood counts, particularly in the first few cycles, to monitor neutropenia as well as thrombocytopenia
  • Signs, symptoms and additive risk factors (smoking, hyperlipidaemia, hypertension) of VTE71
  • International normalized ratio if the patient is on warfarin for thromboprophylaxis
  • Pregnancy testing: obtain two negative pregnancy tests before starting lenalidomide – one 10–14 days prior to starting and the second 24 hours prior to starting. Pregnancy tests monthly thereafter in women with regular menstrual cycles, and every 2 weeks in women with irregular menstrual cycles103

Proteasome inhibitors

Ixazomib

Ixazomib was the first oral proteasome inhibitor (PI) to reach phase III clinical trials. Ixazomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone was approved in 2015 for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory MM.108 This all-oral triplet combination is the first of its kind to include both a PI and an IMiD, and it has shown excellent efficacy, safety and tolerability.39

Ixazomib is being tested as a single agent for maintenance therapy following ASCT or non-transplant induction, given its convenient, once-weekly, oral dosing and manageable toxicity profile.109–111 It is also being evaluated alone, or in combination, in patients with relapsed/refractory or newly diagnosed MM.111

Dose and schedule

In the approved combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone, oral ixazomib is given 4 mg on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle.39,108

Side effects

Commonly observed toxicities are thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, constipation, rash, peripheral neuropathy, peripheral oedema and back pain, and they are mostly grade 1/2 in severity, manageable and reversible.112 Like with other PIs, herpes zoster rash is frequently seen with ixazomib use. The frequency decreases greatly with prophylaxis, which is recommended in all patients receiving ixazomib. Other side effects, including haematological events, occur much less frequently.112 The safety profile of ixazomib is summarized in Table 3.

Gastrointestinal effects: Gastrointestinal side effects are relatively frequent with ixazomib, with nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea seen in 29%, 23% and 45% respectively.112 These symptoms can be managed with supportive therapy, such as anti-diarrhoeal agents (primarily loperamide) and anti-emetics as needed, and dose adjustments.38,108

Skin rash: Rash has been reported at a frequency of 19%, typically occurring within 3 months of starting ixazomib, and is often self-limiting.108 Dose interruption and dose reduction can help with management. Additional medical management includes antihistamines (primarily cetirizine) or topical glucocorticoids.38

Peripheral neuropathy: In the single-agent trials of ixazomib, grade 3 peripheral neuropathy was reported in 2% of patients, and no grade 4 neuropathy was noted.108 Patients should be monitored for symptoms of peripheral neuropathy, and those experiencing new or worsening neuropathy may require dose modification or discontinuation.108

Hepatotoxicity: In trials of ixazomib combinations, elevations in serum aminotransferase levels were seen in approximately 10% of patients. However, values greater than five times the upper limit of normal were rare (<1%).108 Rarely, drug induced liver injury, hepatic steatosis, hepatitis cholestatic and hepatotoxicity have been reported, perhaps related to the production of a toxic intermediate.108

Cytopenias: Thrombocytopenia is seen commonly, especially in the middle of a 28-day cycle, but rapidly recovers to baseline by the time of initiation of the next cycle. Rarely (<1%), severe thrombocytopenia is seen.108 If, during treatment, platelets fall below 30,000/mm3, withhold treatment and adjust dosage. Rarely, severe neutropenia is seen with ixazomib use. If ANC falls to less than 500/mm3, withhold treatment and adjust dose.108

Monitoring for patients on ixazomib includes108

  • Complete blood counts should be assessed monthly. More frequent monitoring during the first three cycles may be considered. Prior to initiating therapy, ANC should be >1,000/mm3.
  • Monitor platelet counts at least monthly during treatment and adjust dosing as needed. Prior to initiating therapy, platelets should be >75,000/mm3.
  • Gastrointestinal effects should be monitored and dosing adjusted for severe diarrhoea, constipation, nausea or vomiting.
  • Hepatic enzymes should be monitored.108

Histone deacetylase inhibitors

Panobinostat

Panobinostat is an histone deacetylase inhibitor that, in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone, was approved for treatment of patients with relapsed MM,113 but was been recently withdrawn as it was felt that there was a further need for adequate and controlled clinical research on the drug’s efficacy in this clinical setting.114

Dose and schedule

Panobinostat is given 20 mg three times weekly in a 21-day cycle (days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10 and 12) in patients with MM who have received at least two prior regimens.113

Side effects113

The main side effects of panobinostat are diarrhoea, peripheral neuropathy, asthenia and fatigue, and haematological side effects including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and lymphocytopenia. Diarrhoea seen with panobinostat can be managed by anti-diarrhoeal medication, such as loperamide.

Cardiac AEs are rarely seen with this drug, but are worth noting. In randomized trials, asymptomatic cases of QT-segment prolongation, T-wave changes and ST–T segment changes were observed more frequently with panobinostat, compared with placebo.113 It should be used with caution in patients who have either pre-existing or high risk of corrected QT-segment (QTc) prolongation. If QTc increases to >480 ms, treatment should be interrupted and any electrolyte abnormalities corrected.113 It should not be initiated in patients with recent myocardial infarction or unstable angina. Other QTc prolonging medications should not be used concomitantly.

After dose interruptions, treatment is usually initiated at reduced doses. Doses are reduced in the increments of 5 mg, up until a minimum of 10 mg per dose three times a week. If the dose of panobinostat requires further reduction, it is discontinued altogether at this point.113

Monitoring for patients on panobinostat includes113

  • Complete blood count should be monitored weekly, or more often if required. If low platelet counts are seen, hold therapy and restart with dose reductions once counts have recovered. Platelet transfusions are rarely needed;
  • electrolytes, fluid intake and hydration status should be monitored if panobinostat-associated diarrhoea is severe.Electrocardiogram (ECG) should be done prior to starting therapy to verify that QTc is less than 450 ms. Repeat ECG and electrolytes periodically during treatment, as clinically indicated.

Selective inhibitors of nuclear transport

Selinexor

Selinexor is an orally bioavailable, highly potent, slowly reversible small molecule, classified as a selective inhibitor of nuclear transport. It is approved in combination with dexamethasone for patients with relapsed/refractory MM who have received at least four prior therapies and whose disease is refractory to at least two PIs, at least two IMiDs and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody.115

An all-oral combination of selinexor, pomalidomide and dexamethasone is under trial for patients with relapsed/refractory MM and newly diagnosed MM.116,117 The phase III BOSTON study (bortezomib, selinexor, and dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma (BOSTON); ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03110562) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of selinexor, bortezomib and low-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory MM is currently on-going.118

Dose and schedule

For the approved indication, selinexor is dosed at 80 mg/day twice weekly and combined with 20 mg dexamethasone twice weekly.113

Side effects

In clinical trials, the most common side effect of selinexor was nausea, which was seen in up to 68% of patients. Vomiting was seen in about one-third of patients.119,120 The rates of nausea and vomiting were the highest at the first dose, and decreased substantially with each cycle. About half of the patients experienced a decreased appetite and one-third lost weight. The intensity and duration of these symptoms can be mitigated by appropriate fluid and caloric intake, appetite stimulants and additional anti-nausea agents. In the selinexor trials, most patients studied received a mandatory 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT3) antagonist on the day of or after dosing to reduce nausea and vomiting. 119,120 Other agents used in these trials to improve nausea were: benzodiazepines as needed, neurokinin-1-receptor antagonists (rolapitant and aprepitant) and cannabinoid-receptor agonists (dronabinol).119,120 Prophylactic olanzapine and megestrol elicited some improvement as well.119,120

Thrombocytopenia is another frequently seen AE, with almost half of patients receiving selinexor affected.119 This may be partly related to selinexor inhibiting thrombopoietin signalling in early megakaryopoiesis.120 It can be managed with dose interruptions and thrombopoietin-receptor agonists if persistent.119,120

Another side effect of note is hyponatraemia, which can be seen in up to 25% of patients treated with selinexor, though it is generally asymptomatic and reversible with supportive care.119 The safety profile of selinexor is given in Table 3.

Monitoring for patients on selinexor includes:115

  • Complete blood counts should be monitored weekly, and a 7–10-day drug holiday should be given on noting decreased platelet counts.
  • Electrolyte levels should be monitored, particularly for sodium levels.
  • Body weight should be monitored at baseline and during treatments, as clinically indicated.

B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitors

Venetoclax

Venetoclax is a novel, orally bioavailable, small-molecule inhibitor that selectively targets B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2). BCL2 is a pro-survival protein, and its inhibition restores the apoptotic ability of malignant cells.121 Approximately 20% of patients with myeloma exhibit translocation t(11;14), which is associated with increased BCL2 expression, making venetoclax an attractive option in these patients.122 Venetoclax has been approved for many hematological malignancies, but has not yet been approved for MM. However,it has shown efficacy in patients with MM who have failed at least one prior treatment, particularly those with a t(11;14) translocation.122,123

Dosing and schedule

Venetoclax is administered in doses ranging from 300 to 1,200 mg daily in a 21-day cycle. If combined with dexamethasone, dexamethasone is given 40 mg weekly.24–26

Side effects

Cytopenias are the most common side effect of venetoclax. Nausea and diarrhoea are occasionally seen, but are self-limiting. Of note, hypophosphataemia has been seen with venetoclax dosing.26,123 The safety profile of venetoclax is summarized in Table 3.

Administering live vaccines to patients on venetoclax is cautioned against, as the safety, efficacy and after effects of live-attenuated vaccines in venetoclax therapy have not been studied yet.26,124 It is advised to wait until B-cell recovery for administration of these vaccines.123

Foetal toxicity

Animal studies have shown post-implantation loss and decreased foetal weight, and adequate data of the safety profile of venetoclax does not exist in pregnant females as of yet. Hence, pregnancy tests should be performed for all women of childbearing potential prior to starting venetoclax, and contraception should be used throughout treatment, and for at least 30 days after completing therapy.124

Monitoring for patients on venetoclax includes:123

  • Complete blood counts should be monitored and managed appropriately;
  • patients should be monitored for signs of infection, which should be managed as medically appropriate. Hold drug if grade ≥3 infection occurs.123

Alkylating agents

Melphalan

Melphalan + prednisone is a well-studied oral regimen and was historically the standard of care for over 40 years in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma.125 Adding thalidomide as a third agent improves efficacy, but increases toxicity. The use of melphalan has declined due to its toxicity and the availability of more effective regimens. Currently, oral melphalan is approved as a palliative therapy in patients with MM.76 Of note, high dose melphalan has a higher degree of bone marrow suppression and subsequently a higher recovery time, therefore it is used in combination with ASCT, and has become the standard of care in patients with newly diagnosed disease, eligible for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients aged <65 years. As many patients with MM are elderly, with a median age of diagnosis ~70 years, a significant proportion of patients with MM cannot receive high-dose melphalan due to bone marrow suppression and toxicity and with it, increased mortality.126

Dose and schedule76

Oral melphalan is currently approved for patients with MM at a dosage of 6 mg daily (3 tablets, which may be given together). Trials have demonstrated efficacy of doses ranging from 4 to 8 mg/m2 as listed below. The dose is adjusted based on blood counts, which are checked weekly. It is usually combined with prednisone at 40–60 mg/m2.

Side effects

Oral melphalan has a unique AE profile, and should not be administered in patients with prior resistance or hypersensitivity to this chemotherapeutic agent. Some commonly seen ADRs include mucositis and bone marrow suppression. Rarely, secondary malignancies and pulmonary toxicity have also been seen.76 The safety profile of melphalan is summarized in Table 3.

Mucositis: Mucositis and injury to the gastrointestinal tract are the most common acute AEs seen with melphalan. Mucositis was seen as frequently as in 75% of patients on melphalan in one study, with severe mucositis seen in 21%. Severity of mucositis was dose dependent.74 Oropharyngeal mucositis is usually painful and sometimes involves the supraglottic area, which may necessitate intubation. Intestinal injury results in nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, cramping and occasionally, acute abdomen. Recipients often require narcotics and parenteral alimentation.74,127,128

To reduce the likelihood of mucositis, patients are advised to eat ice chips to restrict blood flow to the oral mucosa and to reduce drug delivery to the area (referred to as cryotherapy). Palifermin – a keratinocyte growth factor – seems to have a protective effect. Amifostine – a cytoprotectant – scavenges free radicals to facilitate safer use of high-dose melphalan.127,128

Bone marrow suppression: Bone marrow suppression frequently occurs, but is reversible if melphalan is withdrawn early on. Irreversible cases of bone marrow failure due to melphalan use have been reported.76 Melphalan damages the haematopoietic stem-cell compartment, as well as increases the risk of myelodysplasia following transplantation. Patients eligible for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation should not receive melphalan, even orally. They should undergo mobilization and harvesting of peripheral blood progenitor cells before receiving melphalan in the setting of limited treatment options.129,130 It was also noted that melphalan’s haematological toxicity was significantly linked to renal dysfunction. Melphalan, which is a small-cell toxin, may compromise stem-cell reserve and should be avoided in patients that are candidates for stem-cell transplantation.131

Pulmonary toxicity: Pulmonary toxicity is rare with melphalan treatment, but cases of diffuse interstitial lung fibrosis pathologically resembling busulfan-induced lung injury have been reported following melphalan therapy in patients with MM.132,133 Other pulmonary complications include acute bronchoconstriction, diffuse interstitial pneumonitis and fibrosis.134

Fertility impairment: Of note, melphalan can impair fertility. Melphalan suppresses ovarian function in premenopausal women, resulting in amenorrhoea for many.76 Reversible and irreversible testicular suppression has also been reported.76 Haemorrhagic cystitis is also rarely seen with melphalan.66

Monitoring for patients on melphalan includes:76

  • Complete blood count should be performed at the start of therapy and before each subsequent dose, and further therapy should be withheld until counts have sufficiently recovered (leukocytes <3,000/μL and platelets <100,000/μL). Clinicians should consider adjusting dose based on blood counts at their lowest point and on the day of treatment.76
  • Observe patients for signs of bone marrow suppression (e.g. severe infections, bleeding and symptomatic anaemia).

Cyclophosphamide

A combination of oral cyclophosphamide and steroids (prednisone or dexamethasone) were historically used in patients with advanced MM as an alternative to melphalan-based regimens. Cyclophosphamide did not need dose adjustments for renal insufficiency, making it an attractive option at the time, with lesser bone marrow suppression seen as well;135 though it has fallen out of favour as newer drugs have arrived with fewer side effects and easier administration.136 The efficacy of cyclophosphamide is summarized in Table 1.

Dose and schedule

Cyclophosphamide is administered at the dose of 100–500 mg, and can be given daily to once weekly. It is given concurrently with prednisone, which can be dosed ranging from 10 mg to 100 mg.

Side effects137

Vomiting and nausea are frequent within the first 12 hours of cyclophosphamide administration. Persistent and intractable nausea and vomiting are managed with antiemetics, such as ondansetron, other 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, aprepitant, dexamethasone and others.138,139 Also, myelosuppression is seen in a significant number of patients, but is reversible and improves with dose reduction or interruption.32 It has also been reported to cause foetal harm in some cases, and hence women of childbearing ages are advised to avoid conception while on cyclophosphamide.138 Also, secondary primary malignancies can develop many years after discontinuation of cyclophosphamide therapy.137

Hemorrhagic cystitis: Chronic or recurrent haemorrhagic cystitis is of particular concern with cyclophosphamide treatment. It arises when cyclophosphamide is administered without adequate hydration or without concurrent mesna administration.32 Haemorrhagic cystitis is a complex inflammatory response that occurs due to the production of the urotoxic hepatic metabolite, acrolein. Acrolein activates immunocompetent cells and the production of many pro-inflammatory agents, resulting in ulceration, swelling and bleeding of bladder mucosa. Mesna conjugates acrolein in urine, and is therefore used to prevent severe bladder toxicity.137 In addition to mesna, patients on oral cyclophosphamide should increase their fluid intake, with forced diuresis and frequent bladder emptying.140

Gonadal damage: Cyclophosphamide is gonadotoxic. It destroys ovarian cells by cross-linking DNA, and specifically depletes primordial follicles by cross-linking DNA and stimulating apoptosis pathways. Several studies suggest that adjuvant therapies to protect primordial germ cells from these off-target effects may reduce this risk.141,142 In men, cyclophosphamide produces adducts and cross-links DNA, leading to long-term azoospermia. The effect is dose dependent, with patients on lower doses recovering to normospermic levels within 1–3 years, and those on higher doses developing more prolonged, even permanent effects.143

Cardiopulmonary toxicities: Although rare, cardiopulmonary toxicity has been documented following treatment with cyclophosphamide in the form of tachyarrhythmias, hypotension, heart failure, myocarditis, pericardial diseases, pneumonitis and respiratory failure. Cardiotoxicity is dose dependent, and evident as reversible changes in ECG and ventricular mass. Twice-daily regimens of cyclophosphamide have much less of an impact on systolic function than high-dose, once-daily regimens. Severe cases related to high doses of cyclophosphamide may present as haemorrhagic myocarditis, cardiac tamponade and cardiogenic shock. The minimum doses for avoiding cardiotoxicity altogether are unknown, but it is worth mentioning that, thus far, no reports on cyclophosphamide-related cardiotoxicity exist for doses under 100 mg/kg.58,144

Monitoring for patients on cyclophosphamide includes:137

  • Complete blood count monitoring is essential. Dose interruptions and discontinuation is needed if neutrophils drop below 1,000/mm3 or platelets below 50,000/mm3, or if a patient develops a serious infection. The lowest leukocyte and thrombocyte counts are usually reached in the first 2 weeks of treatment.
  • Before starting treatment, exclude or correct any urinary tract obstructions. Routinely test urine for erythrocytes and other signs of uro- or nephrotoxicity. Monitor for urinary signs and symptoms like gross haematuria, burning, dysuria, urgency and incontinence.

All-oral combination regimens

For myeloma, drugs are given in combinations, either in pairs, doublets or triplets based on risk stratification, genetics, disease stage, transplant eligibility and progression of disease.145 Many all-oral combinations significantly improve outcomes and survival compared with conventional therapies. They pose a very attractive option given their ease of administration, the convenience of outpatient dosing and their decreased need for hospital visits. The phase III trials of all such combinations, along with their adverse drug reactions of interest, are outlined in Table 2.

Discussion

Conventionally, myeloma management has included drug combinations that include oral and intravenous drugs. The current treatment paradigm in myeloma increasingly relies on continuous therapy until disease progression, which in the context of intravenous therapies, calls for frequent clinic visits. The cost associated with treating and managing myeloma is among the highest for all malignancies, and aside from the actual therapies, results from in-hospital infusions, frequent clinic visits and travel to receive these comprehensive regimens.146,147 Furthermore, all-oral combination therapies have shown good outcomes, as outlined in Table 2. Shifting towards an all-oral regimen will reduce financial burden, mitigate a large proportion of time spent travelling and in hospital, and prevent excess exposure of these immunocompromised individuals to nosocomial organisms.1 With the outbreak of a global pandemic, as well as the advent of oral therapies, there has been a paradigm shift towards preventing unnecessary hospital and clinic visits. As such, healthcare providers, as well as caregivers, may benefit from a decreased administrative burden. Lastly, a thorough discussion and focus on patient preference, comorbidities, availability of a caregiver, functional status and ability to report adverse effects is imperative in choosing the final line of therapy, and this decision must be individualized for each patient.

2

References

  1. Mankinen P, Vihervaara V, Torvinen S, et al. Costs of administration, travelling, and productivity losses associated with hospital administration of multiple myeloma drugs in Finland. J Med Econ. 2019;22:328–35.
  2. Bird JM, Owen RG, D’Sa S, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma 2011. Br J Haematol. 2011;154:32–75.
  3. Cavo M, Zamagni E, Tosi P, et al. Superiority of thalidomide and dexamethasone over vincristine-doxorubicindexamethasone (VAD) as primary therapy in preparation for autologous transplantation for multiple myeloma. Blood. 2005;106:35–9.
  4. Rajkumar SV, Blood E, Vesole D, et al. Phase III clinical trial of thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone alone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: A clinical trial coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:431–6.
  5. Rajkumar SV, Rosiñol L, Hussein M, et al. Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone as initial therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2171–7.
  6. Dimopoulos M, Spencer A, Attal M, et al. Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2123–32.
  7. Richardson PG, Blood E, Mitsiades CS, et al. A randomized phase 2 study of lenalidomide therapy for patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2006;108:3458–64.
  8. Weber DM, Chen C, Niesvizky R, et al. Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma in North America. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2133–42.
  9. Holstein SA, Jung SH, Richardson PG, et al. Updated analysis of CALGB (Alliance) 100104 assessing lenalidomide versus placebo maintenance after single autologous stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: A randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2017;4:e431–42.
  10. Rajkumar SV, Jacobus S, Callander NS, et al. Lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone versus lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone as initial therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: An open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:29–37.
  11. Zonder JA, Crowley J, Hussein MA, et al. Superiority of lenalidomide (len) plus high-dose dexamethasone (HD) compared to HD alone as treatment of newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM): Results of the randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled SWOG trial s0232. Blood. 2007;110:77.
  12. Lacy MQ, Hayman SR, Gertz MA, et al. Pomalidomide (CC4047) plus low-dose dexamethasone as therapy for relapsed multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5008–14.
  13. Miguel JS, Weisel K, Moreau P, et al. Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose dexamethasone alone for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (mm-003): A randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:1055–66.
  14. Richardson PG, Siegel DS, Vij R, et al. Pomalidomide alone or in combination with low-dose dexamethasone in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: A randomized phase 2 study. Blood. 2014;123:1826–32.
  15. Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, Corradini P, et al. Safety and efficacy of pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone in stratus (MM-010): A phase 3b study in refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2016;128:497–503.
  16. Dimopoulos MA, Gay F, Schjesvold F, et al. Oral ixazomib maintenance following autologous stem cell transplantation (TOURMALINE-MM3): A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393:253–64.
  17. Kumar SK, Berdeja JG, Niesvizky R, et al. Ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: Long-term follow-up including ixazomib maintenance. Leukemia. 2019;33:1736–46.
  18. Mateos MV, Masszi T, Grzasko N, et al. Impact of prior therapy on the efficacy and safety of oral ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone vs. placebo-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in TOURMALINE-MM1. Haematologica. 2017;102:1767–75.
  19. Kumar SK, LaPlant BR, Reeder CB, et al. Randomized phase 2 trial of ixazomib and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma not refractory to bortezomib. Blood. 2016;128:2415–22.
  20. Wolf JL, Siegel D, Goldschmidt H, et al. Phase II trial of the pan-deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat as a single agent in advanced relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2012;53:1820–3.
  21. San-Miguel JF, Hungria VTM, Yoon S-S, et al. Panobinostat plus bortezomib and dexamethasone versus placebo plus bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:1195–206.
  22. Chari A, Vogl DT, Gavriatopoulou M, et al. Oral selinexor–dexamethasone for triple-class refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:727–38.
  23. Vogl DT, Dingli D, Cornell RF, et al. Selective inhibition of nuclear export with oral selinexor for treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:859–66.
  24. Kumar S, Kaufman JL, Gasparetto C, et al. Efficacy of venetoclax as targeted therapy for relapsed/refractory t(11;14) multiple myeloma. Blood. 2017;130:2401–9.
  25. Kaufman JL, Gasparetto C, Schjesvold FH, et al. Phase I/II study evaluating the safety and efficacy of venetoclax in combination with dexamethasone as targeted therapy for patients with t(11;14) relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2019;134:926.
  26. Moreau P, Harrison S, Cavo M, et al. Updated analysis of Bellini, a phase 3 study of venetoclax or placebo in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2019;134:1888.
  27. Oken MM, Harrington DP, Abramson N, et al. Comparison of melphalan and prednisone with vincristine, carmustine, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Cancer. 1997;79:1561–7.
  28. Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Caravita T, et al. Oral melphalan and prednisone chemotherapy plus thalidomide compared with melphalan and prednisone alone in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: Randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006;367:825–31.
  29. Wijermans P, Schaafsma M, Termorshuizen F, et al. Phase III study of the value of thalidomide added to melphalan plus prednisone in elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: The HOVON 49 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3160–6.
  30. Waage A, Gimsing P, Fayers P, et al. Melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide or placebo in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. Blood. 2010;116:1405–12.
  31. de Weerdt O, van de Donk NW, Veth G, et al. Continuous low-dose cyclophosphamide-prednisone is effective and well tolerated in patients with advanced multiple myeloma. Neth J Med. 2001;59:50–6.
  32. Trieu Y, Trudel S, Pond GR, et al. Weekly cyclophosphamide and alternate-day prednisone: An effective, convenient, and well-tolerated oral treatment for relapsed multiple myeloma after autologous stem cell transplantation. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80:1578–82.
  33. Zweegman S, van der Holt B, Mellqvist U-H, et al. Melphalan, prednisone, and lenalidomide versus melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide in untreated multiple myeloma. Blood. 2016;127:1109–16.
  34. Kyriakou C, Thomson K, D’Sa S, et al. Low-dose thalidomide in combination with oral weekly cyclophosphamide and pulsed dexamethasone is a well tolerated and effective regimen in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2005;129:763–70.
  35. Morgan GJ, Schey SA, Wu P, et al. Lenalidomide (Revlimid), in combination with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (RCD), is an effective and tolerated regimen for myeloma patients. Br J Haematol. 2007;137:268–9.
  36. Garderet L, Kuhnowski F, Berge B, et al. Pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. Blood. 2018;132:2555–63.
  37. Chari A, Cho HJ, Dhadwal A, et al. A phase 2 study of panobinostat with lenalidomide and weekly dexamethasone in myeloma. Blood Adv. 2017;1:1575–83.
  38. Moreau P, Masszi T, Grzasko N, et al. Oral ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1621–34.
  39. Kumar SK, Berdeja JG, Niesvizky R, et al. Ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: Long-term follow-up including ixazomib maintenance. Leukemia. 2019;33:1736–46.
  40. European Medicines Agency. Thalidomide Celgene summary of product characteristics. Available at: ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/thalidomide-celgene-epar-product-information_en.pdf(accessed 12 April 2022).
  41. Glasmacher A, Hahn C, Hoffmann F, et al. A systematic review of phase-II trials of thalidomide monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2006;132:584–93.
  42. Palumbo A, Facon T, Sonneveld P, et al. Thalidomide for treatment of multiple myeloma: 10 years later. Blood. 2008;111:3968–77.
  43. Palumbo A, Davies F, Kropff M, et al. Consensus guidelines for the optimal management of adverse events in newly diagnosed, transplant-ineligible patients receiving melphalan and prednisone in combination with thalidomide (MPT) for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Ann Hematol. 2010;89:803–11.
  44. Hall VC, El-Azhary RA, Bouwhuis S, Rajkumar SV. Dermatologic side effects of thalidomide in patients with multiple myeloma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48:548–52.
  45. Pratt G. Lenalidomide and second malignancies in myeloma patients. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:253–4.
  46. Prince HM, Schenkel B, Mileshkin L. An analysis of clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of single-agent thalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma.2007;48:46–55.
  47. Rajkumar SV, Gertz MA, Witzig TE. Life-threatening toxic epidermal necrolysis with thalidomide therapy for myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:972–3.
  48. Ghobrial IM, Rajkumar SV. Management of thalidomide toxicity. J Support Oncol. 2003;1:194–205.
  49. Rajkumar SV, Rosiñol L, Hussein M, et al. Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone as initial therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2171.
  50. Kumar SK, Vij R, Noga SJ, et al. Treating multiple myeloma patients with oral therapies. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2017;17:243–51.
  51. Smith LC, Bertolotti P, Curran K, Jenkins B. Gastrointestinal side effects associated with novel therapies in patients with multiple myeloma: Consensus statement of the IMF Nurse Leadership Board. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2008;12(Suppl. 3):37–52.
  52. Frings K, Gruber S, Kuess P, et al. Modulation of radiation-induced oral mucositis by thalidomide: Preclinical studies. Strahlenther Onkol. 2016;192:561–8.
  53. Kaur A, Yu SS, Lee AJ, Chiao TB. Thalidomide-induced sinus bradycardia. Ann Pharmacother. 2003;37:1040–3.
  54. Kumar S, Gertz MA, Dispenzieri A, et al. Response rate, durability of response, and survival after thalidomide therapy for relapsed multiple myeloma. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78:34–9.
  55. Palumbo A, Palladino C. Venous and arterial thrombotic risks with thalidomide: Evidence and practical guidance. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2012;3:255–66.
  56. Torino F, Barnabei A, Paragliola R, et al. Thyroid dysfunction as an unintended side effect of anticancer drugs. Thyroid. 2013;23:1345–66.
  57. Weber DM, Chen C, Niesvizky R, et al. Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma in North America. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2133–42.
  58. Dhesi S, Chu MP, Blevins G, et al. Cyclophosphamide-induced cardiomyopathy: A case report, review, and recommendations for management. J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep. 2013;1:2324709613480346.
  59. Chen C, Reece DE, Siegel D, et al. Expanded safety experience with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2009;146:164–70.
  60. Benboubker L, Dimopoulos MA, Dispenzieri A, et al. Lenalidomide and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:906–17.
  61. Dimopoulos M, Spencer A, Attal M, et al. Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2123–32.
  62. Dimopoulos MA, Leleu X, Palumbo A, et al. Expert panel consensus statement on the optimal use of pomalidomide in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2014;28:1573–85.
  63. Lacy MQ, Hayman SR, Gertz MA, et al. Pomalidomide (cc4047) plus low-dose dexamethasone as therapy for relapsed multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5008–14.
  64. European Medicines Agency. Revlimid (lenalidomide) summary of product characteristics. Available at: ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/revlimid-epar-product-information_en.pdf(accessed 12 April 2022).
  65. Lonial S, Colson K, Harvey RD, et al. Safety profile of oral ixazomib: Experience from 761 patients (pts) across 14 phase 1 or phase 1/2 clinical studies. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2015;15:e78–e9.
  66. Takeuchi T, Zaitsu M, Mikami K, et al. A case of severe hemorrhagic cystitis caused by melphalan with successful bladder preservation by ligation of bilateral internal iliac arteries. Case Rep Med. 2010;2010:569138.
  67. Bahlis NJ, Sutherland H, White D, et al. Selinexor plus low-dose bortezomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2018;132:2546–54.
  68. Redic KA, Hough SM, Price EM. Clinical developments in the treatment of relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: Impact of panobinostat, the first-in-class histone deacetylase inhibitor. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:2783–93.
  69. DeAngelo DJ, Walker AR, Schlenk RF, et al. Safety and efficacy of oral panobinostat plus chemotherapy in patients aged 65 years or younger with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Res. 2019;85:106197.
  70. Ahmed AR, Hombal SM. Cyclophosphamide (cytoxan): A review on relevant pharmacology and clinical uses. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1984;11:1115–26.
  71. European Medicines Agency. Imnovid (pomalidomide) summary of product characteristics. Available at: ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/imnovid-epar-product-information_en.pdf(accessed 12 April 2022).
  72. Kumar SK, Cavo M, de la Rubia J, et al. Venetoclax or placebo in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (BELLINI): A randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial. LancetOncol. 21:1630–42.
  73. Waage A, Gimsing P, Fayers P, et al. Melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide or placebo in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. Blood. 2010;116:1405–12.
  74. Lazarus HM, Phillips GL, Herzig RH, et al. High-dose melphalan and the development of hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: 25 years later. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2240–3.
  75. Auner HW, Iacobelli S, Sbianchi G, et al. Melphalan 140 mg/m2or 200 mg/m2 for autologous transplantation in myeloma: Results from the Collaboration to Collect Autologous Transplant Outcomes in Lymphoma and Myeloma (CALM) study. A report by the EBMT Chronic Malignancies Working Party. Haematologica. 2018;103:514–21.
  76. US Food and Drug Administration. Alkeran(r) (melphalan) tablets prescribing information. Melphalan tablets, prescribing information. Available at: accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2011/014691s029lbl.pdf(accessed 12 April 2022).
  77. Solomon J, Alexander MJ, Steinfeld JL. Cyclophosphamide: A clinical study. JAMA. 1963;183:165–70.
  78. Dan D, Fischer R, Adler S, et al. Cyclophosphamide: As bad as its reputation? Long-term single centre experience of cyclophosphamide side effects in the treatment of systemic autoimmune diseases. Swiss Med Wkly. 2014;144:w14030.
  79. Lee YC, Park JS, Lee CH, et al. Hyponatraemia induced by low-dose intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25:1520–4.
  80. Elazzazy S, Mohamed AE, Gulied A. Cyclophosphamide-induced symptomatic hyponatremia, a rare but severe side effect: A case report.Onco Targets Ther. 2014;7:1641–5.
  81. Gottdiener JS, Appelbaum FR, Ferrans VJ, et al. Cardiotoxicity associated with high-dose cyclophosphamide therapy. Arch Intern Med. 1981;141:758–63.
  82. Faurschou M, Sorensen IJ, Mellemkjaer L, et al. Malignancies in Wegener’s granulomatosis: Incidence and relation to cyclophosphamide therapy in a cohort of 293 patients. J Rheumatol. 2008;35:100–5.
  83. Fairchild WV, Spence CR, Solomon HD, Gangai MP. The incidence of bladder cancer after cyclophosphamide therapy. J Urol. 1979;122:163–4.
  84. Singhal S, Mehta J, Desikan R, et al. Antitumor activity of thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1565–71.
  85. Raza S, Safyan RA, Lentzsch S. Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) in multiple myeloma. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2017;17:846–857.
  86. Glasmacher A, Hahn C, Hoffmann F, et al. A systematic review of phase-II trials of thalidomide monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2006;132:584–93.
  87. Grammatico S, Cesini L, Petrucci M. Managing treatment-related peripheral neuropathy in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood Lymphat Cancer. 2016;6:37–47
  88. Kumar S, Gertz MA, Dispenzieri A, et al. Response rate, durability of response, and survival after thalidomide therapy for relapsed multiple myeloma. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78:34–9.
  89. Zangari M, Saghafifar F, Anaissie E, et al. Activated protein C resistance in the absence of factor V Leiden mutation is a common finding in multiple myeloma and is associated with an increased risk of thrombotic complications. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2002;13:187–92.
  90. Svetlana Balkanov K, Sotirova T, Genadieva SS, et al. Adverse effects of thalidomide administration, in patients with myeloma multiplex? Mater Sociomed. 2014;26:134–6.
  91. Palumbo A, Rajkumar S, Dimopoulos M, et al. Prevention of thalidomide- and lenalidomide-associated thrombosis in myeloma. Leukemia. 2008;22:414–23.
  92. Key NS, Khorana AA, Kuderer NM, et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in patients with cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:496–520.
  93. Farge D, Frere C, Connors JM, et al. 2019 international clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:e566–e81.
  94. Storrar NPF, Mathur A, Johnson PRE, Roddie PH. Safety and efficacy of apixaban for routine thromboprophylaxis in myeloma patients treated with thalidomide- and lenalidomide-containing regimens. Br J Haematol. 2019;185:142–4.
  95. Rajkumar SV, Gertz MA, Witzig TE. Life-threatening toxic epidermal necrolysis with thalidomide therapy for myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:972–3.
  96. Badros AZ, Siegel E, Bodenner D, et al. Hypothyroidism in patients with multiple myeloma following treatment with thalidomide. Am J Med. 2002;112:412–3.
  97. Vargesson N. Thalidomide-induced teratogenesis: History and mechanisms. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2015;105:140–56.
  98. Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;60:727–800.
  99. Mikhael J, Ismaila N, Cheung MC, et al. Treatment of multiple myeloma: ASCO and cCCO Joint Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:1228–63.
  100. Palumbo A, Bladé J, Boccadoro M, et al. How to manage neutropenia in multiple myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2012;12:5–11.
  101. Leleu X, Gay F, Flament A, et al. Incidence of neutropenia and use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in multiple myeloma: Is current clinical practice adequate? Ann Hematol. 2018;97:387–400.
  102. Büyükkaramikli NC, de Groot S, Fayter D, et al. Pomalidomide with dexamethasone for treating relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma previously treated with lenalidomide and bortezomib: An evidence review group perspective of a nice single technology appraisal. PharmacoEconomics. 2018;36:145–59.
  103. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Pomalidomide prescribing information. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2017/204026s019lbl.pdf (accessed on 17 May 2022).
  104. Pingali SR, Haddad R, Saad A. Current concepts of clinical management of multiple myeloma. Dis Mon. 2012;58:195–207
  105. Fouquet G, Bories C, Guidez S, et al. Pomalidomide for multiple myeloma. Expert Rev Hematol. 2014;7:719–31.
  106. Moreau P, Dimopoulos MA, Richardson PG, et al. Adverse event management in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma taking pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone: A pooled analysis. Eur J Haematol. 2017;99:199–206.
  107. Ludwig H, Miguel JS, Dimopoulos MA, et al. International Myeloma Working Group recommendations for global myeloma care. Leukemia. 2014;28:981–92.
  108. U.S Food and Drug Administration. Ninlaro (ixazomib) highlights of prescribing information. Available at: accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2015/208462lbl.pdf(Accessed on 12 April 2022)
  109. Dimopoulos A, Špička I, Quach H, et al. Ixazomib as postinduction maintenance for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma not undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation: The phase III TOURMALINE-MM4 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:4030–41
  110. Mina R, Falcone AP, Bringhen S, et al. Ixazomib-based induction regimens plus ixazomib maintenance in transplant-ineligible, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: The phase II, multi-arm, randomized UNITO-EMN10 trial. Blood Cancer J. 2021;11:197.
  111. Striha A, Ashcroft AJ, Hockaday A, et al. The role of ixazomib as an augmented conditioning therapy in salvage autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and as a post-ASCT consolidation and maintenance strategy in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (ACCoRd [UK-MRA Myeloma XII] trial): Study protocol for a phase III randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2018;19:169.
  112. Kumar S, Moreau P, Hari P, et al. Management of adverse events associated with ixazomib plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2017;178:571–82.
  113. U.S Food and Drug Administration. Farydak(r) (panobinostat) highlights of prescribing information. Available at:
    accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2015/205353s000lbl.pdf (accessed on 12 April 2022)
  114. Virgil H. FDA approval for panobinostat in multiple myeloma withdrawn in the United States. 2021. Available at:
    cancernetwork.com/view/fda-approval-for-panobinostat-in-multiple-myeloma-withdrawn-in-the-united-states (accessed on 12 April 2022)
  115. U.S Food and Drug Administration. Xpovio(tm) (selinexor) highlights of prescribing information. Available at: accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2019/212306s000lbl.pdf(accessed on 12 April 2022)
  116. Chen CI, Sutherland HJ, Kotb R, et al. Selinexor plus pomalidomide and low dose dexamethasone (SPd) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2018;132(Suppl. 1):1993. Poster 653.
  117. ClinicalTrials.gov. Selinexor and Backbone Treatments of Multiple Myeloma Patients (STOMP). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02343042. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02343042(accessed 12 April 2022).
  118. ClinicalTrials.gov. Bortezomib, Selinexor, and Dexamethasone in Patients With Multiple Myeloma (BOSTON) ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03110562. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03110562?term=NCT03110562&cond=
    myeloma&draw=2&rank=1    (accessed 12 April 2022).
  119. Gavriatopoulou M, Chari A, Chen C, et al. Integrated safety profile of selinexor in multiple myeloma: Experience from 437 patients enrolled in clinical trials. Leukemia. 2020;34:2430–40.
  120. Machlus KR, Wu SK, Vijey P, et al. Selinexor-induced thrombocytopenia results from inhibition of thrombopoietin signaling in early megakaryopoiesis. Blood. 2017;130:1132–43.
  121. Scheffold A, Jebaraj BMC, Stilgenbauer S. Venetoclax: Targeting BCL2 in hematological cancers. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2018;212:215–42.
  122. Vaxman I, Sidiqi MH, Gertz M. Venetoclax for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Expert Rev Hematol. 2018;11:915–20.
  123. U.S Food and Drug Administration. Venclexta(r) (venetoclax tablets) highlights of prescribing information. Available at: accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2018/208573s009lbl.pdf(accessed 12 April 2022).
  124. Juárez-Salcedo LM, Desai V, Dalia S. Venetoclax: Evidence to date and clinical potential. Drugs Context. 2019;8:212574.
  125. Alexanian R, Haut A, Khan AU, et al. Treatment for multiple myeloma: Combination chemotherapy with different melphalan dose regimens. JAMA. 1969;208:1680–5.
  126. Poczta A, Rogalska A, Marczak A. Treatment of multiple myeloma and the role of melphalan in the era of modern therapies-current research and clinical approaches. J Clin Med. 2021;10:1841.
  127. Grazziutti ML, Dong L, Miceli MH, et al. Oral mucositis in myeloma patients undergoing melphalan-based autologous stem cell transplantation: Incidence, risk factors and a severity predictive model. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006;38:501–6.
  128. Spivakovsky S. Oral cryotherapy reduced oral mucositis in patients having cancer treatments. Evid Based Dent. 2016;17:80.
  129. Boccadoro M, Palumbo A, Bringhen S, et al. Oral melphalan at diagnosis hampers adequate collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells in multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2002;87:846–50.
  130. Goldschmidt H, Hegenbart U, Wallmeier M, et al. Factors influencing collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells following high-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 1997;98:736–44.
  131. Osterborg A, Ehrsson H, Eksborg S, et al. Pharmacokinetics of oral melphalan in relation to renal function in multiple myeloma patients. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1989;25:899–903.
  132. Codling BW, Chakera TM. Pulmonary fibrosis following therapy with melphalan for multiple myeloma. J Clin Pathol. 1972;25:668–73.
  133. Major PP, Laurin S, Bettez P. Pulmonary fibrosis following therapy with melphalan: Report of two cases. Can Med Assoc J. 1980;123:197–202.
  134. Li L, Mok H, Jhaveri P, et al. Anticancer therapy and lung injury: Molecular mechanisms. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018;18:1041–57.
  135. Song MK, Chung JS, Shin HJ, et al. Cyclophosphamide-containing regimen (TCD) is superior to melphalan-containing regimen (MPT) in elderly multiple myeloma patients with renal impairment. Ann Hematol. 2012;91:889–96.
  136. Schjesvold F, Oriol A. Current and novel alkylators in multiple myeloma. 2021;13:2465.
  137. U.S Food and Drug Administration. Cyclophosphamide for injection, USP and cyclophosphamide tablets USP. Available at: accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2012/012142s109lbl.pdf(accessed 12 April 2022).
  138. Warr DG. Chemotherapy- and cancer-related nausea and vomiting. Curr Oncol. 2008;15:S4–S9.
  139. Kris MG, Hesketh PJ, Somerfield MR, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline for antiemetics in oncology: Update 2006. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2932–47.
  140. Brock N, Pohl J, Stekar J, Scheef W. Studies on the urotoxicity of oxazaphosphorine cytostatics and its prevention–III. Profile of action of sodium 2-mercaptoethane sulfonate (mesna). Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1982;18:1377–87.
  141. Luan Y, Edmonds ME, Woodruff TK, Kim S-Y. Inhibitors of apoptosis protect the ovarian reserve from cyclophosphamide. J Endocrinol. 2019;240:243–56.
  142. Bedoschi G, Navarro PA, Oktay K. Chemotherapy-induced damage to ovary: Mechanisms and clinical impact. Future Oncol. 2016;12:2333–44.
  143. Meistrich ML. Male gonadal toxicity. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009;53:261–6.
  144. Braverman AC, Antin JH, Plappert MT, et al. Cyclophosphamide cardiotoxicity in bone marrow transplantation: A prospective evaluation of new dosing regimens. J Clin Oncol. 1991;9:1215–23.
  145. Palumbo A, Avet-Loiseau H, Oliva S, et al. Revised international staging system for multiple myeloma: A report from International Myeloma Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:2863–9.
  146. Bhattacharya K, Bentley JP, Ramachandran S, et al. Phase-specific and lifetime costs of multiple myeloma among older adults in the US. JAMA. 2021;4:e2116357.
  147. Rajkumar, SV. Value and cost of myeloma therapy. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018;38:662–6
3

Article Information

Disclosure

Sachi Singhal and Shaji Kumar have no financial or non-financial relationships or activities to declare in relation to this article.

Compliance With Ethics

This study involves a review of the literature and did not involve any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Review Process

Double-blind peer review.

Authorship

The named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship of this manuscript, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given final approval for the version to be published.

Correspondence

Shaji Kumar, Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. E: kumar.shaji@mayo.edu

Support

No funding was received in the publication of this article.

Access

This article is freely accessible at touchONCOLOGY.com © Touch Medical Media 2022

Data Availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the writing of this article.

Received

2022-01-20

4

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
8 mins

Trending Topic
Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked

Teclistamab Monotherapy for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Beatrice M Razzo, Alfred L Garfall

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common haematological malignancy, with upwards of 35,000 diagnoses in the USA each year.1,2 It remains a leading cause of blood cancer–related mortality worldwide, and although therapeutic advances have allowed for significant improvements in the median overall survival,3,4 the majority of patients still experience cycles of relapse that are eventually fatal.5 While patients with MM are living longer, a subgroup with high-risk disease at diagnosis still does poorly, with a median […]

touchREVIEWS in Oncology & Haematology. 2023;19(1):46–51 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17925/OHR.2023.19.1.46
Advertisement
    • 5

    Related Content in Multiple Myeloma

    Latest articles videos and clinical updates - straight to your inbox

    Close Popup