This website is intended for healthcare professionals only

Trending Topic

3 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked

This issue of touchREVIEWS in Oncology & Haematology brings together a diverse collection of articles reflecting the growing complexity of cancer care and the continued evolution of precision medicine across tumour types. From rare malignancies and treatment-related challenges to emerging targeted therapies and novel biological insights, the contributions highlight both recent progress and the significant […]

PRISMA PET: Rethinking imaging for prostate cancer staging

Karen Middelbo Buch-Olsen, Mads Hvid Aaberg Poulsen
4 mins
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Published Online: Mar 26th 2026

“Better scans are only useful if they lead to better decisions – and that’s what we’re starting to see”

“If these trends hold, it would strongly support the use of PSMA-PET with evidence that has not been present before”

At EAU26: 41st Annual EAU Congress, held 13–16th March 2026 in London, Dr Karen Buch-Olsen (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Denmark) and Professor Mads Hvid Aaberg Poulsen (Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark) shared early insights from the PRISMA PET trial, a randomized study comparing conventional sodium fluoride PET CT with PSMA PET CT in newly diagnosed, intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients. The study is not just about imaging accuracy, it explores patient benefit and how advanced staging can influence treatment decisions.


Q: What are the current unmet clinical needs for primary staging in high-risk prostate cancer, and what motivated the PRISMA-PET trial?

Dr Buch-Olsen: Guidelines have long called for randomized trials to demonstrate patient benefit from PSMA PET CT. While its diagnostic accuracy is proven, no study has examined whether staging patients with PSMA PET CT actually improves outcomes. That patient-centered endpoint was our primary motivation. Randomizing two staging modalities is unusual. This trial is extraordinary not just for its scale but for its focus on real patient benefit, setting a potential benchmark for future prostate cancer imaging studies.

Prof Poulsen: We knew PSMA PET CT was more accurate than conventional imaging. We also know from other studies that the use of PSMA-PET changes patient management, but we wanted to examine whether this change of patient management resulted in a benefit for the patient. No one had tested this in a real-world, clinical setting until now. Our randomized, multi-hospital study aimed to fill that gap.

Q: What was the study design, methodology, eligibility criteria and endpoints?

Dr Buch-Olsen: The trial enrolled 385 newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients eligible for staging imaging. Patients with PSA levels above 200 were excluded to avoid skewing results from extensive metastatic disease. Participants were randomized to either conventional sodium fluoride PET CT or PSMA PET CT, and treatment was guided by scan results. Primary endpoints focused on progression-free survival, while secondary endpoints included stage changes, treatment modifications, residual disease and quality of life.

Q: What were the results and main take-home messages?

Dr Buch-Olsen: We did not see a statistically significant difference in progression-free survival overall, but Kaplan-Meier plots for high-risk patients diverged after one year, suggesting longer progression-free survival with PSMA PET CT. This indicates a tangible patient benefit through more accurate staging.

Q: Despite similar early progression-free survival, what does the trend in high-risk patients tell us about the potential long-term benefit of PSMA-PET?

Prof Poulsen: Using Alluvial diagrams, we could visually track patient pathways, from initial staging to treatment decisions, demonstrating that better imaging leads to appropriate treatment. Even though follow-up is short, trends are promising, and the study’s successful execution across multiple centers is itself a major achievement.

Q: What questions remain unanswered, and how might these findings influence future guidelines for prostate cancer staging?

Dr Buch-Olsen: We plan a five-year follow-up to assess overall survival and longer-term progression-free survival. If trends continue, this trial could support widespread adoption of PSMA PET CT across Europe. Guidelines could eventually reference our study as the first randomized trial directly comparing two staging modalities with patient outcomes as the endpoint.

Prof Poulsen: There’s still work ahead – longer follow-up and quality-of-life analyses. But the data already provide compelling evidence that improved imaging can meaningfully guide patient care.

Register now for FREE access

Already registered? Login below.

Register
Login

Cite: PRISMA PET: Rethinking imaging for prostate cancer staging. touchONCOLOGY. March 19th, 2026

Disclosure: Karen Buch-Olsen has received grant/research support from the Rhodes Foundation, Department of Nuclear Medicine OUH, Thornøes and Høyrups Foundation, Region of Southern Denmark, MANTRA and PREMIO. This short article was prepared by touchONCOLOGY in collaboration with Dr Buch-Olsen. Views expressed are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Touch Medical Media.

Editor: Sophie Nickelson (Editorial Director)


Related content

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Close Popup