Trending Topic

3D rendered Medical Illustration of Male Anatomy - Rectal Cancer.
14 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Gabriel Valagni, Nkafu Bechem Ndemazie, Tiago Biachi de Castria

Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is a novel oral formulation of two drugs with promising results in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).1 Trifluridine is a thymidine-based nucleoside analogue that, after intracellular phosphorylation, gets incorporated into DNA, causing DNA dysfunction.2 It was first identified by Callahan et al. in 1996 as an active impurity in the herbicide trifluralin, which […]

Therapeutic Armamentarium in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Josep Tabernero, Ben Markman, Teresa Macarulla
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Published Online: Jun 3rd 2011 European Oncology, 2009;5(1):64-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17925/EOH.2009.05.1.48
Select a Section…
1

Abstract

Overview

Abstract
Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancies in both men and women and, despite recent advances, the prognosis in the metastatic setting remains poor. In the last decade the introduction of new chemotherapeutic agents has improved the median overall survival of these patients. The demonstration that deregulation and/or activation of selected kinase proteins are common phenomena in patients with colon cancer has prompted the development of new biologic therapies targeting such proteins. Further, inhibition of the angiogenesis process can result in efficacy advantage. To date, three targeted therapies have been approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: bevacizumab, cetuximab and panitumumab. New treatments directed against other molecular targets are being developed in order to improve these results.

Keywords
Colon cancer, chemotherapy, bevacizumab, cetuximab, panitumumab, targeted therapies

Disclosure: Teresa Macarulla and Ben Markman have no conflicts of interest to declare. Josep Tabernero has participated in the advisory boards of Amgen, Imclone, Merck, MSD, Onyx, Pfizer, Pharmamar, Roche and sanofi-aventis, has been involved in symposia sponsored by Amgen, Bayer, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, Roche and sanofi-aventis and has provided expert testimony at the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) sponsored by Amgen.
Received: 7 July 2009 Accepted: 3 August 2009
Correspondence: Josep Tabernero, Medical Oncology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, P Vall d’Hebron, 119–129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain. E: jtabernero@vhio.net

2

Article

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains one of the most common tumour types and a leading cause of cancer death worldwide. The American Cancer Society (ACS) estimates that 148,610 people were diagnosed with, and 55,170 people died of, CRC last year in the US.1 Despite these statistics, mortality from CRC has decreased over the past 30 years, possibly because of better treatment modalities. Until a few years ago, treatment options for CRC patients were limited to 5-fluorouracil (5FU). However, the introduction of two new cytotoxic drugs, irinotecan and oxaliplatin, has resulted in significant progress in the treatment of metastatic CRC (mCRC).2,3 Recently, three novel targeted agents have been approved for the treatment of mCRC: bevacizumab, cetuximab and panitumumab. As a consequence, the armamentarium of treatment options for patients with CRC is rapidly expanding. In spite of these advances, the prognosis for patients with mCRC remains poor, with a five-year survival rate less than 5%. Therefore, new strategies are needed to improve this prognosis. In this article we review the therapeutic options in mCRC.

The Chemotherapy Era
Until a few years ago, 5FU and 5FU in combination with leucovorin (LV) were the treatment options for patients with CRC. Some clinical trials evaluated different schedules and doses of these two drugs, infusional schedules of 5FU and combinations with LV being the most attractive regimens. Nevertheless, the median overall survival (mOS) remained around 12 months.4 Saltz et al.2 demonstrated in a phase III trial with 628 patients that the addition of irinotecan to bolus 5FU/LV (IFL) increased the mOS from 12.6 to 14.8 months (p=0.04). Another study, conducted by Douillard et al. (with an infusional 5FU/LV regimen),5 confirmed this data. The results of these two prospective phase III randomised, controlled, multicentre, multinational clinical trials in patients with previously untreated mCRC served as the basis for US and European approval of irinotecan/5FU/LV for this indication. At the same time, de Gramont et al.3 published the results of a phase III trial which concluded that the combination of infusional FU/LV and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) (median 9 months versus 6.2 months; p=0.0003) with acceptable tolerability. However, this combination failed to demonstrate a statistically significant increase in OS (median 16.2 months versus 14.7 months; p=0.12). For this reason the FOLFOX regimen was only approved in Europe as first-line treatment in mCRC. With the results of the Goldberg trial in 2004,6 oxaliplatin was approved in the US for the treatment of mCRC. In this study, 795 patients with mCRC were randomised to receive IFL, FOLFOX or irinotecan and oxaliplatin (IROX). The results of the FOLFOX group were significantly superior to the IFL and IROX groups. At that time, two 5FU-based infusional regimens with oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or irinotecan (FOLFIRI) became the most popular schedules used worldwide for the treatment of patients with mCRC.

To register to view full article click here.

3

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Close Popup