Trending Topic

3D Rendered Medical Illustration of Male Anatomy - Colon Cancer; Ascending Colon.
17 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked

Rat sarcoma virus (RAS) proteins are a family of prototypical oncogenes frequently mutated in human cancers. Mutations in the RAS gene account for 19% of all pathogenic alterations and are the subject of extensive research in molecular and clinical oncology.1 The RAS family consists of three major isoforms, namely the Harvey rat sarcoma virus (HRAS), the neuroblastoma RAS […]

Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Bevacizumab in Adults with Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Gabriel Valagni, Nkafu Bechem Ndemazie, Tiago Biachi de Castria
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Published Online: Nov 5th 2024 touchREVIEWS in Oncology & Haematology. 2024;20(2):Online ahead of journal publication
Select a Section…
1

Abstract

Overview

This review addresses a significant gap in the medical literature by providing a comprehensive analysis of the evolving landscape of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment, with a specific focus on the combination of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) and bevacizumab (BEV). Synthesizing data from early phase I trials and real-world studies, including pivotal studies such as BiTS, RECOURSE and SUNLIGHT, we offer comprehensive insights into the efficacy and safety profiles of FTD/TPI combined with BEV. Notably, this combination has demonstrated promising results, significantly improving overall survival (OS) compared with FTD/TPI monotherapy. Even though further research is warranted to identify predictive biomarkers for response to this combination, real-world studies have further underscored its significance, revealing notable response rates and meaningful progression-free survival and OS durations. Ongoing trials and future research endeavours continue to explore the potential of this combination, aiming to refine dosing regimens and expand its application in earlier treatment lines, offering hope for more personalized and effective mCRC therapies.

Keywords
2

Article

Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is a novel oral formulation of two drugs with promising results in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).1 Trifluridine is a thymidine-based nucleoside analogue that, after intracellular phosphorylation, gets incorporated into DNA, causing DNA dysfunction.2 It was first identified by Callahan et al. in 1996 as an active impurity in the herbicide trifluralin, which has anti-parasitic properties.3 On the other hand, tipiracil, a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor, was developed by K. Richardson in 1990 as part of a research programme aimed at creating a broad-spectrum anti-fungal agent.4

The rationale for combining trifluridine and tipiracil lies in their synergistic pharmacological effect: tipiracil enhances the bioavailability of trifluridine by inhibiting its breakdown.5 Studies have shown that combining trifluridine/tipiracil with an anti-angiogenic agent that targets vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (bevacizumab [BEV]) can lead to augmented intracellular concentrations of active trifluridine, as demonstrated in preclinical studies.6 This combination has been extensively studied, with clinical trials reporting promising results regarding the efficacy and safety in patients with refractory mCRC.7

FTD/TPI was developed by Taiho Pharmaceutical (Tokyo, Japan) and was first approved as a novel oral nucleoside anti-tumour combination agent in Japan in March 2014.8 It has shown significant survival benefits in patients with refractory mCRC in a randomized phase III trial involving both Asian and non-Asian patients.1 In September 2015, it was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration following a phase III clinical trial indicating an overall survival (OS) benefit in patients with refractory mCRC.9 The addition of BEV, an established anti-cancer agent that inhibits angiogenesis, was first studied in the C-TASK FORCE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02743221) in Japan, followed by another study in Denmark in 2017/2018.10,11 These studies demonstrated that the combination therapy with BEV was associated with significantly longer median progression-free survival (PFS) and OS compared with FTD/TPI monotherapy.12 More recently, the multinational phase III SUNLIGHT (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04737187), TAS-CC3 (UMIN000022438) and BiTS (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03447490) studies demonstrated that the combination of FTD/TPI and BEV has clinically meaningful activity in previously pre-treated patients with mCRC, establishing it as a potential new treatment option.12–18 These studies also highlighted that ongoing clinical trials are investigating this combination in earlier treatment lines for patients with mCRC.

In this review, we will summarize this treatment trajectory and discuss potential approaches to be explored in the future.

Preclinical studies

In vitro experiments with TAS-102 (FTD/TPI), a synergistic combination of trifluorothymidine and the thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor TPI, have shown promising results in preclinical studies, particularly in overcoming resistance to standard chemotherapies such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Initially, the compound was recognized for its dual mechanism of action: the inhibition of thymidylate synthase (TS) and the incorporation of FTD into DNA. The latter mechanism, in particular, was found to be significantly more effective in TAS-102 compared with other anti-tumour nucleosides, correlating positively with its anti-tumour activity in xenograft models.19 While the drug’s pharmacokinetics in in vitro settings remain a subject for further exploration, its non-cross-resistance with 5-FU and possible anti-angiogenic effects through thymidine phosphorylase inhibition make it a compelling candidate for both research and future clinical investigations. However, the dual synergistic action of both components improves cytotoxicity by activating different pathways, leading to cell death.

Subsequent studies expanded on these findings, demonstrating TAS-102’s efficacy against a range of 5-FU-resistant cancer types, including colorectal, pancreatic and oesophageal cancers. These studies highlighted the compound’s ability to induce marked DNA fragmentation in tumour cells, a key indicator of its cytotoxic effects, as illustrated in Figure 1.20 This cytotoxicity was attributed to the high dosage and short exposure times of TAS-102, which were effective in both in vitro and xenograft models. TAS-102’s unique mechanism and metabolism position it as a promising treatment alternative for patients resistant to or intolerant of 5-FU-based fluoropyrimidines.21,22 This has the potential to reduce the toxicity of each component, ensuring safety in the use of both entities in improving cytotoxicity while minimizing potential toxicity in each of the entities used alone.

Figure 1: Comparison of the mechanisms of action of TAS-102 and 5-FU20

Figure 1: Comparison of the mechanisms of action of TAS-102 and 5-FU<sup>20</sup>

Reproduced and adapted with permission from Longo-Muñoz et al. (2017)20 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

5-FU = 5-fluorouracil; dTMP = deoxythymidine monophosphate; dTTP = deoxythymidine triphosphate; dUMP = deoxyuridine monophosphate; F3dTDP = trifluorodeoxythymidine diphosphate; F3dTMP = trifluorodeoxythymidine monophosphate; F3dTTP = trifluorodeoxythymidine triphosphate; FdUMP = fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate; TK1 = thymidine kinase 1; TPI = tipiracil hydrochloride; TS = thymidylate synthase.

Further exploration of TAS-102’s mechanisms revealed additional therapeutic potentials, such as its anti-angiogenic properties. The compound was shown to inhibit platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor, which is identical to thymidine phosphorylase, an enzyme involved in tumour angiogenesis and metastasis. This inhibition suggests that TAS-102 could also play a role in reducing liver metastasis in colorectal cancer, a significant factor affecting patient survival.21

Moreover, the role of the tipiracil compound (TPI), a specific inhibitor of thymidine phosphorylase, is crucial for enhancing the bioavailability and efficacy of anti-tumour 2′-deoxyribonucleosides. This selective inhibition has been shown to potentiate the biological activity of these nucleosides in cancer treatment, significantly increasing their blood levels and anti-tumour activity when used in combination, as demonstrated in human stomach cancer xenograft models.23

Collectively, these preclinical studies underscore the multi-faceted mechanisms through which TAS-102 combats cancer, providing a robust foundation for its clinical application in treating resistant forms of the disease. The integration of direct DNA damage, TS inhibition and anti-angiogenic effects, along with the modulation of nucleoside metabolism, presents a comprehensive approach to cancer therapy that could significantly enhance treatment outcomes for patients with resistant tumours.

Clinical studies in metastatic colorectal cancer

Phase I clinical trials

As a newly developed nucleoside for managing refractory mCRC, several clinical studies have been conducted to determine the safety, toxicity and tolerable dosing of the FTD/TPI (TAS-102) combination. Phase I clinical trials have been conducted worldwide and are registered in more than 60 countries, aimed at determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D).

In 2006, Hong et al. proposed that the initial dose of TAS-102 was 100 mg/m2/day, based on a preclinical monkey model. However, the first two patients experienced substantial toxicity, prompting a lower dose level to be explored. Subsequent dose levels showed certain toxicities, eventually establishing 50 mg/m2/day as the MTD for this schedule.24

In the study by Overman et al., TAS-102 was administered three times daily on days 1–5 and 8–12 every 4 weeks. The trial enrolled 15 patients and identified granulocytopaenia and fatigue as DLTs, with granulocytopaenia being the primary toxicity observed. Although no responses were noted, prolonged stable disease was observed in nine patients.25

Another study by Overman et al. explored TAS-102 administration once daily on a 5-day-per-week schedule, either on days 1–5 and 8–12 every 4 weeks (schedule A) or on days 1–5 every 3 weeks (schedule B). Sixty-three patients participated, with granulocytopaenia again being the predominant DLT. The recommended phase II doses were established as 100 mg/m2/day for schedule A and 160 mg/m2/day for schedule B.26

Doi et al. conducted a dose-escalation study in Japanese patients, administering TAS-102 twice daily on days 1–5 and 8–12 in a 28-day cycle. The study observed DLTs such as severe leukopaenia, neutropaenia and thrombocytopaenia, particularly at the extremes of the dosage range (30 and 70 mg/m2). The RP2D was set at 70 mg/m2/day, with a disease-control rate of 50.0% and a median PFS of 2.4 months among patients with mCRC.27

Overall, these phase I trials of TAS-102 across different patient populations and dosing schedules consistently identified granulocytopaenia as a significant DLT, along with varying degrees of other toxicities such as fatigue, anaemia and gastrointestinal symptoms. These trials helped in establishing dosing recommendations for subsequent studies, with a focus on optimizing the balance between efficacy and tolerability in a heavily pre-treated patient population.

BiTS study (phase Ib/II)

The BiTS study was a phase Ib/II clinical trial conducted at several Japanese hospitals, enrolling patients with mCRC who were refractory or intolerant to standard chemotherapies. The trial aimed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of a biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV regimen with the standard schedule and evaluated it as a potential treatment option with the expectation of equivalent efficacy but with reduced toxicity and a simpler regimen schedule. The primary endpoint was the PFS rate at 16 weeks.15

A total of 46 patients were enrolled, and the RP2D was determined to be 70 mg/m2/day TAS-102. The results showed promising anti-tumour activity, with a 16-week PFS rate of 40.9%, a median PFS of 4.29 months and an OS of 10.86 months. The combination treatment showed an acceptable toxicity profile, with common grade ≥3 adverse events, including hypertension (40.9%), neutropaenia (15.9%) and leukopaenia (15.9%).15

A sub-group analysis showed a connection between chemotherapy-induced neutropaenia (CIN) during the initial two cycles and the prognosis of TAS-102 plus BEV. Specifically, those experiencing CIN had a longer OS compared with those without CIN (hazard ratio [HR]=0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20.95, p=0.036), as shown in Table 1.15 However, even without considering CIN, the combination of biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV showed better results compared with TAS-102 alone, with a median OS of 6.77.1 months versus 9.5 months, respectively.15

Table 1: Pre-specified sub-group analysis of factors affecting overall survival15

Results of full input

Backward selection (threshold p=0.20)

Variables

HR

95% CI

p-Value

HR

95% CI

p-Value

Age

Per year

0.96

0.93

1

0.05

0.96

0.92

0.99

0.022

ECOG PS

PS1

3.07

1.24

7.6

0.015

2.99

1.44

6.18

0.003

Tumour location

Right-sided

0.91

0.36

2.27

0.833

RAS status

Mutant

1.01

0.49

2.07

0.989

Prior regorafenib administration

Yes

0.64

0.26

1.58

0.329

Neutropaenia

Within second cycles

0.8

0.36

1.78

0.581

––

Data were extracted from Satake et al., 2020.15

CI = confidence interval; ECOG = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; HR = hazard ratio; PS = performance status; RAS = rat sarcoma virus mutation.

Despite mild haematological side effects, the biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV combination demonstrated promising therapeutic effects. This prompts the re-evaluation of the current TAS-102 schedule when combined with BEV. Adopting a biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV regimen could potentially mitigate the need for unnecessary TAS-102 dose reductions, maintain higher doses and potentially prove effective even in cases without CIN.15

Although the study had several limitations, including its non-randomized design, relatively small sample size and the impact on quality of life (QoL) not being evaluated, the biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV showed promising anti-tumour efficacy and acceptable toxicity. These suggest that it could be a treatment option for heavily treated patients with mCRC, especially those who are not eligible for intensive therapy.

TASCO 1 trial (phase II)

The TASCO 1 trial (an open-label, randomized, phase II study comparing S 95005 plus bevacizumab to capecitabine plus bevacizumab in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer who are non-eligible for intensive therapy; ClinicalTrials.gov identifierNCT04012207) was a randomized, non-comparative phase II trial conducted at 52 participating centres in several European countries and in Australia and Brazil. The study included patients aged 18 years or older with a recent diagnosis of mCRC, known as the rat sarcoma virus mutation status, who had not received systemic anti-cancer therapy and were not eligible for intense chemotherapy. In this trial, patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either trifluridine/tipiracil plus BEV (TT-B) or capecitabine plus BEV (C-B).28

The primary focus of the study was OS, and findings, as of 1 September 2020, revealed a median OS of 22.3 months with TT-B compared with 17.7 months with C-B and the adjusted HR for OS was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.55–1.10). It was noted that no variables negatively affected OS with TT-B, and the safety results were consistent with prior findings.28

Regarding the reported adverse events, hand–foot syndrome occurred in 52.6% of patients in the C-B arm, with 11.8% experiencing severe cases (grade ≥3). Conversely, this condition was much less common in the TT-B arm, occurring in only 3.9% of patients. However, the TT-B arm experienced a higher incidence of haematological treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), including grade 3 or 4 neutropaenia, anaemia and thrombocytopaenia. Serious TEAEs were reported in 66.2% and 59.2% of patients in the TT-B arm and C-B arm, respectively. Additionally, the percentage of patients discontinuing study medication due to a TEAE was similar between the groups: 42.9% in TT-B and 42.1% in C-B.28

RECOURSE trial (phase III TAS-102)29

In a comprehensive phase III clinical trial, Mayer et al. investigated the efficacy and safety of TAS-102, a novel oral medication combining trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride, for the treatment of refractory colorectal cancer.1 This global study was a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study involving 800 patients from Japan, the USA, Europe and Australia, randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive TAS-102 versus placebo, respectively (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01966306).29 It included patients aged 18 years and older with adequate liver, bone marrow and renal functions with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 who had biopsy-confirmed adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum and additionally with evidence of tumour progression within 3 months after the last administration of chemotherapy.1

The study’s primary outcome was OS, defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. Secondary endpoints included PFS, objective response rate, rate of disease control and safety. The median OS was 7.1 months for the TAS-102 group versus 5.3 months for the placebo group, respectively, with a 1-year OS rate of 27% for patients treated with TAS-102 and 18% for those treated with placebo.1

The findings from the trial indicated a significant improvement in survival outcomes for patients treated with TAS-102. Specifically, the median OS for patients receiving TAS-102 was 7.1 months compared with 5.3 months for those receiving the placebo, as shown in Table 2.1 This represented a 32% reduction in the risk of death for the TAS-102 group, with an HR of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.58–0.81; p<0.001).1

Table 2: Main findings from the RECOURSE trial (phase III) of TAS-102 in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer1

Outcome

TAS-102 group

Placebo group

Hazard ratio (95% CI)

p-value

Median overall survival (months)

7.1

5.3

0.68 (0.58–0.81)

<0.001

Median time to worsening performance status (months)

5.7

4.0

0.66 (0.56–0.78)

<0.001

Neutropaenia, any grade (incidence %)

67

<1

Leukopaenia, any grade (incidence %)

77

5

Febrile neutropaenia, any grade (incidence %)

4

Deaths related to TAS-102

1

Data were extracted from Mayer et al., 2015.1

CI = confidence interval.

However, the use of TAS-102 was associated with higher rates (grade >3) of certain adverse events. Notably, 38% of patients treated with TAS-102 developed neutropaenia and 21% developed leukopaenia.1

Overall, the phase III trial conducted by Mayer et al. provided strong evidence that TAS-102 offers a significant survival benefit for patients with refractory colorectal cancer, despite an increased risk of certain haematological toxicities. These findings support the potential of TAS-102 as a valuable treatment option in this patient population, contributing to both extended survival and prolonged maintenance of functional status.

SUNLIGHT trial (phase III TAS-102 plus bevacizumab)

In the study conducted by Prager et al., the efficacy and safety of combining FTD/TPI with BEV for the treatment of refractory mCRC were evaluated. This research is significant, as it builds on previous findings revealing that FTD/TPI alone can prolong OS in this patient population. The study aimed to determine if adding BEV to the treatment regimen could further enhance survival outcomes.12

The trial involved 492 adults, who were equally divided into two groups: one received the combination of FTD/TPI plus BEV and the other received FTD/TPI alone in the treatment of advanced metastatic CRC worldwide. The trial included participants who had received no more than two previous chemotherapy treatments for colorectal cancer with distant metastasis. This chemotherapy included but was not limited to fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, oxaliplatin and neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. FTD/TPI was administered orally twice daily from days 1 to 5 and from 8 to 12 of every 28-day cycle, while BEV was given as an intravenous injection on days 1 and 15 of every 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint of the study was OS, and the secondary endpoints were PFS and safety measures, particularly focusing on the time to worsening of the ECOG performance status score.12

The results were promising, as summarized in Table 3, which presents the main outcomes obtained from this study.12

Table 3: Comparing the main outcomes of the study on the efficacy of TAS-102 alone versus TAS-102 plus bevacizumab in treating refractory metastatic colorectal cancer12

Outcome metric

FTD/TPI alone group

FTD/TPI + bevacizumab combination group

Hazard ratio

Median overall survival

7.5 (95% CI, 6.3–8.3)

10.8 (95% CI, 9.4–11.8)

For death, 0.61 (95% CI, 0.49–0.77), p<0.001

Median progression-free survival (months)

2.4 (95% CI, 2.1–3.2)

5.6 (95% CI, 4.5–5.9)

For disease progression or death, 0.44 (95% CI, 0.36–0.54), p<0.001

Median time to worsening of the ECOG performance status score (months)

6.3 (95% CI, 5.6–7.2)

9.3 (95% CI, 8.3–10.6)

For worsening ECOG score, 0.54 (95% CI, 0.43–0.67)

Data were extracted from Prager et al., 2023.12

CI = confidence interval;ECOG = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group;FDP/TPI = trifluridine/tipiracil.

Safety profiles were manageable in both groups, and the most common adverse events were neutropaenia, nausea and anaemia, as shown in Table 4.12 Importantly, no treatment-related deaths were reported. Additionally, the combination therapy also delayed the worsening of the ECOG performance status score, with a median time of 9.3 months compared with 6.3 months in the FTD/TPI group.12

Table 4: Adverse events of any cause occurring in at least 10% of the patients in the group that received trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab during the treatment period12

Event

FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab (n=246)

FTD/TPI (n=246)

Any grade

Grade 3 or 4

Any grade

Grade 3 or 4

Number of patients (%)

Neutropaenia

153 (62.2)

106 (43.1)

126 (51.2)

79 (32.1)

Nausea

91 (37.0)

4 (1.6)

67 (27.2)

4 (1.6)

Anaemia

71 (28.9)

15 (6.1)

78 (31.7)

27 (11.0)

Asthenia

60 (24.4)

10 (4.1)

55 (22.4)

10 (4.1)

Fatigue

53 (21.5)

3 (1.2)

40 (16.3)

9 (3.7)

Diarrhoea

51 (20.7)

2 (0.8)

46 (18.7)

6 (2.4)

Decreased appetite

50 (20.3)

2 (0.8)

38 (15.4)

3 (1.2)

Vomiting

46 (18.7)

2 (0.8)

36 (14.6)

4 (1.6)

Thrombocytopaenia

42 (17.1)

7 (2.8)

28 (11.4)

3 (1.2)

Decreased neutrophil count

34 (13.8)

22 (8.9)

17 (6.9)

13 (5.3)

Abdominal pain

29 (11.8)

5 (2.0)

27 (11.0)

4 (1.6)

Constipation

27 (11.0)

0

28 (11.4)

2 (0.8)

Stomatitis

27 (11.0)

1 (0.4)

9 (3.7)

0

Hypertension

25 (10.2)

14 (5.7)

5 (2.0)

3 (1.2)

Data are included for all the patients who received at least one dose of trial.

Adapted from Prager et al., 2023.12

FTD/TPI = trifluridine/tipiracil.

The sub-group analysis of this study indicated that the benefit of the combination therapy over FTD/TPI alone was consistent across various sub-groups. This includes sub-groups defined by age, sex, geographic region, the ECOG performance status score and prior exposure to anti-VEGF therapies (not necessarily BEV). The HRs for OS and PFS consistently favoured the combination therapy in these sub-groups, with no significant interaction between sub-group characteristics and treatment effects.12

In conclusion, this study provided compelling evidence that the combination of FTD/TPI with BEV significantly enhances both OS and PFS in patients with refractory mCRC, with statistical significance indicated by p-values <0.001. The safety profile of this combination therapy was manageable, with neutropaenia, nausea and anaemia being the most common adverse events, and no treatment-related deaths were reported. In addition, the combination therapy notably delayed the worsening of the ECOG performance status score, suggesting an extension of survival and an improvement in the QoL for these patients. Notably, this study stands out as the most important of this review, highlighting a promising treatment option that could significantly enhance the QoL and survival outcomes for this challenging patient population.

Ongoing studies and future endeavours of TAS-102 plus bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer

Building on the promising findings from the SUNLIGHT study, ongoing clinical trials are actively exploring the combination of TAS-102 (trifluridine/tipiracil) and BEV for refractory mCRC, as presented in Table 5.30–38

Table 5: Ongoing studies with TAS-102 plus bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer30–38

Identifier

Phase

Treatment

Primary endpoint

NCT0603920230

II

CA102N combined with TAS-102 compared with bevacizumab combined with TAS-102

PFS

NCT0620200131

I/II

Irinotecan, trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus bevacizumab

ORR

NCT0583995132

Cohort

Regorafenib, trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus bevacizumab

Descriptive analysis

NCT0468396533

II

Pemetrexed, trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus bevacizumab

ORR

NCT0585449834

II

Liposomal irinotecan, trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus bevacizumab

PFS

NCT0500713235

II

Panitumumab, trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus bevacizumab

ORR

NCT0606070436

II

Envafolimab, trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus bevacizumab

ORR

NCT0580693137

II

Oxaliplatin, irinotecan, trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus bevacizumab

DCR

NCT0624206738

II

Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus bevacizumab

PFS

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.

DCR = disease control rate;ORR = objective response rate;PFS = progression-free survival.

One notable ongoing trial is a phase I/II study that combines irinotecan, TAS-102 and BEV. This trial targets patients with mCRC who have already undergone standard therapies. The study was initiated on 1 October 2022 and is expected to be completed by 30 September 2026. It aims to assess the safety and efficacy of this combination as a second-line treatment, potentially providing a new option for patients with limited alternatives.39

Another important study involves the combination of pemetrexed, TAS-102 and BEV. This exploratory study targets patients who have progressed after standard second-line therapy for mCRC. The study was initiated on 1 January 2021 and is expected to be completed by 2024. Its goal is to evaluate the safety, efficacy and optimal dosing regimens of this combination therapy.40

Additionally, the STAR-T study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05839951) is an observational study examining sequential treatment with regorafenib followed by TAS-102, with or without BEV, in patients with mCRC. This study, which was initiated on 24 April 2023, is expected to provide real-world outcomes from community clinical practices in the USA, being currently active.41

Future research endeavours are likely to focus on several key areas. Expanding the patient population eligible for the combination therapy of TAS-102 and BEV is a priority. This could include patients at different stages of the disease and those who have received various prior treatments. Moreover, combining TAS-102 and BEV with other novel agents, such as immune-checkpoint inhibitors, could further enhance treatment efficacy and patient outcomes. It is important to note that immune cell programmed cell death ligand-1 expression is significantly higher in mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H: microsatellite instability-high) colorectal cancer compared with mismatch repair-proficient (MSI-L: microsatellite instability-low) tumours. Given this, the combination of these therapies could be especially beneficial for MSI-H tumours. However, challenges remain in accurately assessing the MSI status. While immunohistochemistry (IHC) and MSI testing are widely used, both methods can sometimes produce variable results. For instance, IHC can yield false negatives due to somatic mutations, complicating the evaluation of mismatch repair proteins. Upfront testing using both IHC and MSI-polymerase chain reaction could help overcome these limitations and improve patient selection for combination therapies.42

Exploring the combination’s efficacy in earlier lines of therapy is another promising avenue. By integrating TAS-102 earlier in the treatment regimen, researchers aim to improve long-term outcomes and potentially increase the survival rates for patients with mCRC. This strategy could redefine the treatment landscape for colorectal cancer, offering new hope for patients who have limited therapeutic options.

Conclusions

The journey of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in managing refractory mCRC offers a glimmer of hope amidst challenging circumstances. The early phase I trials laid the groundwork, providing invaluable insights into dosing and safety parameters. Subsequent studies, such as BiTS, further affirmed the efficacy and tolerability of FTD/TPI, particularly in combination with BEV, inspiring ongoing investigation.

While the RECOURSE trial demonstrated the standalone efficacy of FTD/TPI in refractory mCRC, it is the SUNLIGHT trial that truly highlights the potential of combination therapy. The SUNLIGHT study, with its encouraging outcomes – especially the enhancements in OS and disease control – emphasizes the transformative impact of pairing FTD/TPI with BEV.

Looking ahead, these trials instil hope not only for patients but also for the entire medical community committed to refining dosing strategies, expanding patient eligibility and exploring innovative combinations.

3

References

List View
Grid View
1
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Mayer RJVan Cutsem EFalcone Aet alRandomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancerN Engl J Med. 2015;372:190919. DOI10.1056/NEJMoa1414325.

2
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Sakamoto KYokogawa TUeno Het alCrucial roles of thymidine kinase 1 and deoxyutpase in incorporating the antineoplastic nucleosides trifluridine and 2’-deoxy-5-fluorouridine into DNAInt J Oncol2015;46:232734DOI10.3892/ijo.2015.2974.

3
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Callahan HLKelley CPereira Tet alMicrotubule inhibitors: Structure-activity analyses suggest rational models to identify potentially active compoundsAntimicrob Agents Chemother1996;40:94752. DOI10.1128/AAC.40.4.947.

4
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Sajid MAKhan ZAShahzad SAet alRecent advances in thymidine phosphorylase inhibitors: Syntheses and prospective medicinal applicationsTurk J Chem2017;41:128DOI10.3906/kim-1602-79.

5
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Cleary JMRosen LSYoshida Ket alA phase 1 study of the pharmacokinetics of nucleoside analog trifluridine and thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor tipiracil (components of TAS-102) vs trifluridine aloneInvest New Drugs2017;35:18997DOI10.1007/s10637-016-0409-9.

6
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Bordonaro RCalvo AAuriemma Aet alTrifluridine/tipiracil in combination with oxaliplatin and either bevacizumab or nivolumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: A dose-expansion, phase I studyESMO Open. 2021;6:100270. DOI10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100270.

7
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Voutsadakis IAA systematic review and meta-analysis of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: Evidence from real-world seriesCurr Oncol2023;30:522739. DOI10.3390/curroncol30060397.

8
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 BioSpaceTaiho Pharmaceutical’s Lonsurf® (trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride) tablets approved in Japan for treatment of advanced metastatic colorectal cancer2014Available atwww.biospace.com/article/releases/taiho-pharmaceutical-s-lonsurf-and-0174-trifluridine-and-tipiracil-hydrochloride-tablets-approved-in-japan-for-treatment-of-advanced-metastatic-colore/ (accessed23 May 2024).

9
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Van Cutsem EHochster HSShitara Ket alPooled safety analysis from phase 3 studies of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in patients (pts) with metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (mGC/mGEJC) and metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:40394039. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.4039.

10
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 ClinicalTrials.govCombination of TAS-102 and Bevacizumab as Salvage Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies (C-TASK FORCE). ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02743221 Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02743221 (accessed22 October 2024).

11
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Pfeiffer PYilmaz MMöller Set alTAS-102 with or without bevacizumab in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer: An investigator-initiated, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trialLancet Oncol2020;21:41220DOI10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30827-7.

12
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Prager GWTaieb JFakih Met alTrifluridine-tipiracil and bevacizumab in refractory metastatic colorectal cancerN Engl J Med. 2023;388:165767. DOI10.1056/NEJMoa2214963.

13
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Tabernero JTaieb JPrager GWet alTrifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for third-line management of metastatic colorectal cancer: SUNLIGHT study designFuture Oncol2021;17:197785. DOI10.2217/fon-2020-1238.

14
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Yoshida YYamada TKamiyama Het alCombination of TAS-102 and bevacizumab as third-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: TAS-CC3 studyInt J Clin Oncol2021;26:1117. DOI10.1007/s10147-020-01794-8.

15
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Satake HKato TOba Ket alPhase Ib/II study of biweekly TAS-102 in combination with bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard therapies (BiTS study)Oncologist2020;25:e185563DOI10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0643.

16
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 ClinicalTrials.govTrifluridine-Ttipiracil and Bevacizumab in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (SUNLIGHT Study). ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04282865 Available athttps://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04282865 (accessed22 October 2024).

17
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 UMIN Clinical Trials RegistryTAS-102 and Bevacizumab as Third-line Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer (TAS-CC3). UMIN Clinical Trials Registry Identifier: UMIN000022438 Available athttps://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000025861 (accessed22 October 2024).

18
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 ClinicalTrials.govPhase Ib/II Study of Biweekly TAS-102 in Combination with Bevacizumab for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies (BiTS Study). ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03447490 Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03447490 (accessed22 October 2024).

19
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Tanaka NSakamoto KOkabe Het alRepeated oral dosing of TAS-102 confers high trifluridine incorporation into DNA and sustained antitumor activity in mouse modelsOncol Rep2014;32:231926. DOI10.3892/or.2014.3487.

20
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Longo-Muñoz FArgiles GTabernero Jet alEfficacy of trifluridine and tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo, with supportive care, in a randomized, controlled trial of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer from Spain: Results of a subgroup analysis of the phase 3 RECOURSE trialClin Transl Oncol. 2017;19:22735. DOI10.1007/s12094-016-1528-7.

21
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Emura TMurakami YNakagawa Fet alA novel antimetabolite, TAS-102 retains its effect on FU-related resistant cancer cellsInt J Mol Med2004;13:5459.

22
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Emura TSuzuki NYamaguchi Met alA novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, exhibits antitumor activity in FU-resistant human cancer cells through a mechanism involving FTD incorporation in DNAInt J Oncol2004;25:5718.

23
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Fukushima MSuzuki NEmura Tet alStructure and activity of specific inhibitors of thymidine phosphorylase to potentiate the function of antitumor 2’-deoxyribonucleosidesBiochem Pharmacol. 2000;59:122736. DOI10.1016/s0006-2952(00)00253-7.

24
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Hong DSAbbruzzese JLBogaard Ket alPhase I study to determine the safety and pharmacokinetics of oral administration of TAS-102 in patients with solid tumors. Cancer. 2006;107:138390. DOI10.1002/cncr.22125.

25
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Overman MJKopetz SVaradhachary Get alPhase I clinical study of three times a day oral administration of TAS-102 in patients with solid tumorsCancer Invest2008;26:7949. DOI10.1080/07357900802087242.

26
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Overman MJVaradhachary GKopetz Set alPhase 1 study of TAS-102 administered once daily on a 5-day-per-week schedule in patients with solid tumorsInvest New Drugs2008;26:44554. DOI10.1007/s10637-008-9142-3.

27
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Doi TOhtsu AYoshino Tet alPhase I study of TAS-102 treatment in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumoursBr J Cancer. 2012;107:42934. DOI10.1038/bjc.2012.274.

28
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Van Cutsem EDanielewicz ISaunders MPet alFirst-line trifluridine/tipiracil + bevacizumab in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: Final survival analysis in the TASCO1 studyBr J Cancer2022;126:154854DOI10.1038/s41416-022-01737-2.

29
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 ClinicalTrials.govEfficacy and Safety Study of TAS-102 in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (RECOURSE). ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01966306 Available athttps://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01966306 (accessed22 October 2024).

30
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 ClinicalTrials.govCombined with TAS-102 Compared to Bevacizumab Combined with TAS-102 in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06039226 Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06039226 (accessed22 October 2024).

31
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 ClinicalTrials.govPhase I Study of Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) plus Irinotecan and Bevacizumab in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06202001 Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06202001 (accessed22 October 2024).

32
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 ClinicalTrials.govPhase III Study of Regorafenib (BAY73-4506) in Combination With Trifluridine and Tipiracil (TAS-102) for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (OSERO). ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05839951 Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05839951 (accessed22 October 2024).

33
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 ClinicalTrials.govA Single Arm, Open Label, Exploratory Study of Pemetrexed and TAS-102 in Combination With Bevacizumab in Patients Who Have Progressed After Standard Second Line Therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04683965 Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04683965 (accessed22 October 2024).

34
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 ClinicalTrials.govPhase II Study of Liposomal Irinotecan with TAS-102 and Bevacizumab for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05854498 Available athttps://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05854498 (accessed22 October 2024).

35
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 ClinicalTrials.govPhase II Study of Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) plus Panitumumab versus Trifluridine/Tipiracil plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05007132 Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05007132 (accessed22 October 2024).

36
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 ClinicalTrials.govEnvafolimab, Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102), and Bevacizumab in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06060704 Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06060704 (accessed22 October 2024).

37
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 ClinicalTrials.govOxaliplatin, Irinotecan, Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05806931 Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05806931 (accessed22 October 2024).

38
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 ClinicalTrials.GovTrifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) plus Bevacizumab in Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Phase III Randomized Study. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06242067 Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06242067 (accessed22 October 2024).

39
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 ClinicalTrials.govLiposomal irinotecan with TAS102 and bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (identifier NCT05854498). University of Wisconsin, Madison2023Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05854498?id=NCT05854498 (accessed25 May 2024).

40
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 ClinicalTrials.govPemetrexed and TAS-102 in combination with bevacizumab in refractory colorectal cancer (identifier NCT04683965). The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University2022Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04683965?id=NCT04683965 (accessed25 May 2024).

41
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 ClinicalTrials.govAn observational study called STAR-T to learn more about the sequential treatment with regorafenib and TAS-102 in adults with metastatic colorectal cancer under real world conditions (STAR-T) (Identifier NCT05839951). Bayer2023Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05839951?id=NCT05839951 (accessed25 May 2024).

42
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Adeleke SHaslam AChoy Aet alMicrosatellite instability testing in colorectal patients with Lynch syndrome: Lessons learned from a case report and how to avoid such pitfallsPer Med2022;19:27786. DOI10.2217/pme-2021-0128.

4

Article Information

Disclosure

Tiago Biachi de Castria receives an honorarium from Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., AstraZeneca and A2Bio. Gabriel Valagni and Nkafu Bechem Ndemazie have no financial or non-financial relationships or activities to declare in relation to this article.

Compliance With Ethics

This article involves a review of literature and does not report on new clinical data, or any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Review Process

Double-blind peer review.

Authorship

All named authors meet the criteria of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors for authorship for this manuscript, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole and have given final approval for the version to be published.

Correspondence

Tiago Biachi de CastriaDepartment of Gastrointestinal OncologyH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute12902 Magnolia Drive, TampaFL 33612USAtiago.biachi@moffitt.org

Support

No funding was received for the publication of this article.

Access

This article is freely accessible at touchONCOLOGY.com. ©Touch Medical Media 2024.

Data Availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the writing of this article.

Received

2024-07-02

5

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Close Popup