Trending Topic

3D Rendered Medical Illustration of The Lungs.
12 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Asrar A Alahmadi, Logan Roof, Claire Verschraegen

Highlights Immunotherapy, especially combinatory immunotherapy, has shown promise with prolonged survival for patients with advanced mesothelioma in the first-line setting (see the sections on ‘Systemic treatment and immunotherapy debut’ and ‘Randomized immunotherapy trials of mesothelioma’). Histology-based therapy is important to consider, with non-epithelioid subtypes responding better to immunotherapy than to chemotherapy (see the section on […]

Time for a New Paradigm in the Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma

Jennifer Wargo, Rene Gonzalez, Rodabe Amaria
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Published Online: Jun 25th 2012 Oncology & Hematology Review (US), 2012;8(2):100-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17925/OHR.2012.08.2.100
Select a Section…
1

Abstract

Overview

Metastatic melanoma is a very common disease with an increasing incidence worldwide and is notoriously difficult to treat. The long-established treatments including dacarbazine and interleukin-2 have shown limited response rates and are associated with significant toxicities. More recently, treatments have been developed that decrease inhibition of T-cell action against melanomas. Among these, ipilimumab was recently approved for use in metastatic melanoma and has shown improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival rates (PFS). Another such treatment currently in development is the monoclonal antibody, anti-PD-1. This blocks PD-1 inhibition of T-cells and has shown promising response rates in early clinical trials. Another treatment approach is to use targeted therapies in patients with mutations in BRAF or CKIT signaling pathways and it is vital that the mutational status of these genes be determined in patients with metastatic melanoma to best determine effective therapeutic options. Vemurafenib was recently approved for metastatic melanoma and targets the BRAF V600E mutation which occurrs in about 50 % of cutaneous melanomas. Recent results from the ongoing Phase III BRIM-3 study comparing vemurafenib with dacarbazine showed that median 12-month OS rates and the risk of death were reduced with vemurafenib. Other BRAF inhibitors such as dabrafenib and MEK inhibitors such as trametinib are also in development. New treatments in ongoing clinical trials coupled with an improved biologic understanding are likely to improve responses and outcomes for patients with metastatic melanoma.

Keywords

Metastatic melanoma, targeted treatments, BRAF-, MEK-, CKIT-inhibitors, PD-1, PD-1ligand, anti-PD-1

2

Article

The incidence of melanoma is high and is the sixth most common cancer in US men and eighth most common cancer type in US women.1,2 Moreover, the incidence of metastatic melanoma has been increasing worldwide at a rate faster than any other solid malignancy.3 There were an estimated 76,250 new cases of melanoma and 9,180 deaths from the disease in the US alone this year.4 Melanoma has been shown to affect a large number of younger patients and thus it is one of the leading cancers in terms of patient years-of-life lost.5

The prognosis for patients with metastatic disease has traditionally been poor with a median survival of approximately 6–9 months due to lack of effective therapeutic options.6,7 Indeed, no therapy had ever shown a survival advantage for patients with advanced melanoma until 2011. Survival for patients with stage III disease is quite varied as patients with low tumor burden (stage IIIa) do much better than those with multiple lymph node metastases or in-transit metastases (stage IIIb/IIIc disease).8

While melanoma has been resistant to chemotherapy, it does express tumor-specific antigens that have made immunotherapy a viable treatment option. Key research in determining gene mutations that drive melanoma growth have been instrumental in helping to develop targeted therapies that show great promise in treating patients with advanced disease. Two new agents, ipilimumab and vemurafenib, have recently received approval based on clinical evidence that they impart a statistically significant survival advantage over control patients receiving vaccine or chemotherapy. Appropriate combination and sequencing of old and new agents holds the promise of increasing the number of complete durable responses.

The paradigm shift for melanoma will be to consider long-term durable responses and a potential cure of the disease as the goal of future therapeutic trials, rather than simply palliation. This article provides an overview of traditional and emerging management approaches as well as reviews strategies for combining and sequencing available treatments to optimize outcomes.

Challenges in Treating Metastatic Melanoma
Melanoma is a particularly difficult disease to manage for several reasons. Firstly, it has a high metastatic potential with a tendency to disseminate to distant sites, often including the brain, via hematogenous and lymphatic channels leading to poor prognosis.9 It is the only cancer where millimeters (not centimeters) of tumor are used in the staging system, with a 4 mm melanoma imparting as much risk as a 10 cm lung tumor. Furthermore, melanomas can downregulate patients’ own intrinsic immune system pathways creating both a local and systemic immune-depleted state.10

To view the full article in PDF or eBook formats, please click on the icons above.

2

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, et al., Cancer statistics, 2010,
    CA Cancer J Clin, 2010;60:277–300.

  2. U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group, United States Cancer
    Statistics: 1999-2007 Incidence and Mortality Web-based
    Report. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human
    Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and
    National Cancer Institute, Web Page, 2010. Available at:
    www.cdc.gov/uscs (accessed September 12, 2012).

  3. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al., Cancer statistics, 2009,
    CA Cancer J Clin, 2009;59:225–49.

  4. Siegel R, Desantis C, Virgo K, et al., Cancer treatment and
    survivorship statistics, 2012, CA Cancer J Clin, 2012;62:220–41.

  5. Ekwueme DU, Guy GP, Jr, Li C, et al., The health burden and
    economic costs of cutaneous melanoma mortality by
    race/ethnicity-United States, 2000 to 2006, J Am Acad Dermatol,
    2011;65:S133–43.

  6. Middleton MR, Grob JJ, Aaronson N, et al., Randomized phase
    III study of temozolomide versus dacarbazine in the treatment
    of patients with advanced metastatic malignant melanoma,
    J Clin Oncol, 2000;18:158–66.

  7. Bedikian AY, Millward M, Pehamberger H, et al., Bcl-2
    antisense (oblimersen sodium) plus dacarbazine in patients
    with advanced melanoma: the Oblimersen Melanoma Study
    Group, J Clin Oncol, 2006;24:4738–45.

  8. American Cancer Society, Melanoma Skin Cancer. Available at:
    www.cancer.org/Cancer/SkinCancer-Melanoma/
    DetailedGuide/melanoma-skin-cancer-survival-rates
    (accessed June 18, 2012).

  9. Hamid O, Boasberg PD, Rosenthal K, et al., Systemic treatment
    of metastatic melanoma: new approaches, J Surg Oncol,
    2011;104:425–9.

  10. Critchley-Thorne RJ, Yan N, Nacu S, et al., Down-regulation of
    the interferon signaling pathway in T lymphocytes from
    patients with metastatic melanoma, PLoS Med, 2007;4:e176.

  11. Eggermont AM, Kirkwood JM, Re-evaluating the role of
    dacarbazine in metastatic melanoma: what have we learned
    in 30 years?, Eur J Cancer, 2004;40:1825–36.

  12. Chapman PB, Hauschild A, Robert C, et al., Improved survival
    with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation,
    N Engl J Med, 2011;364:2507–16.

  13. Robert C, Thomas L, Bondarenko I, et al., Ipilimumab plus
    dacarbazine for previously untreated metastatic melanoma,
    N Engl J Med, 2011;364:2517–26.

  14. Bedikian A, Lebbe C, Robert C, et al., Survival in a phase III,
    randomized, double-blind study of dacarbazine with or
    without oblimersen (Bcl-2 antisense) in patients with
    advanced melanoma and low-normal serum lactate
    dehydrogenase (LDH; AGENDA), J Clin Oncol,
    2011;29(suppl):Abstract 8531.

  15. Rosenberg SA, Yang JC, White DE, et al., Durability of
    complete responses in patients with metastatic cancer treated
    with high-dose interleukin-2: identification of the antigens
    mediating response, Ann Surg, 1998;228:307–19.

  16. Atkins MB, Lotze MT, Dutcher JP, et al., High-dose
    recombinant interleukin 2 therapy for patients with metastatic
    melanoma: analysis of 270 patients treated between 1985 and
    1993, J Clin Oncol, 1999;17:2105–16.

  17. Patel PM, Suciu S, Mortier L, et al., Extended schedule,
    escalated dose temozolomide versus dacarbazine in stage IV
    melanoma: final results of a randomised phase III study
    (EORTC 18032), Eur J Cancer, 2011;47:1476–83.

  18. Quirt I, Verma S, Petrella T, et al., Temozolomide for the
    treatment of metastatic melanoma: a systematic review,
    Oncologist, 2007;12:1114–23.

  19. Avril MF, Aamdal S, Grob JJ, et al., Fotemustine compared with
    dacarbazine in patients with disseminated malignant
    melanoma: a phase III study, J Clin Oncol, 2004;22:1118–25.

  20. Bedikian AY, Johnson MM, Warneke CL, et al., Does complete
    response to systemic therapy in patients with stage IV
    melanoma translate into long-term survival?, Melanoma Res.

  21. Atkins MB, Hsu J, Lee S, et al., Phase III trial comparing
    concurrent biochemotherapy with cisplatin, vinblastine,
    dacarbazine, interleukin-2, and interferon alfa-2b with
    cisplatin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine alone in patients with
    metastatic malignant melanoma (E3695): a trial coordinated by
    the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, J Clin Oncol,
    2008;26:5748–54.

  22. Traynor K, Ipilimumab approved for metastatic melanoma,
    Am J Health Syst Pharm, 2011;68:768.

  23. FDA approves vemurafenib for treatment of metastatic
    melanoma, Oncology (Williston Park), 2011;25:906.

  24. Culver ME, Gatesman ML, Mancl EE, et al., Ipilimumab: a novel
    treatment for metastatic melanoma, Ann Pharmacother,
    2011;45:510–9.

  25. Cranmer LD, Hersh E, The role of the CTLA4 blockade in the
    treatment of malignant melanoma, Cancer Invest,
    2007;25:613–-31.

  26. Weber JS, O’Day S, Urba W, et al., Phase I/II study of
    ipilimumab for patients with metastatic melanoma, J Clin Oncol,
    2008;26:5950–6.

  27. Hodi FS, O’Day SJ, McDermott DF, et al., Improved survival
    with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma,
    N Engl J Med, 2010;363:711–23.

  28. Wolchok JD, Neyns B, Linette G, et al., Ipilimumab
    monotherapy in patients with pretreated advanced melanoma:
    a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 2, doseranging
    study, Lancet Oncol, 2010;11:155–64.

  29. Kudchadkar RR, Gallenstein D, Martinez AJ, et al., Phase I trial
    of extended-dose anti-PD-1 antibody BMS-936558 with a
    multipeptide vaccine for previously treated stage IV
    melanoma, J Clin Oncol, 2012;30(suppl; abstr 8582).

  30. Hodi FS, Sznol M, McDermott DF, et al., Clinical activity and
    safety of anti-PD-1 (BMS-936558, MDX-1106) in patients
    with advanced melanoma (MEL), J Clin Oncol,
    2012;30(suppl; abstr 8507).

  31. Platz A, Egyhazi S, Ringborg U, et al., Human cutaneous
    melanoma; a review of NRAS and BRAF mutation frequencies
    in relation to histogenetic subclass and body site, Mol Oncol,
    2008;1:395–405.

  32. Curtin JA, Fridlyand J, Kageshita T, et al., Distinct sets of
    genetic alterations in melanoma, N Engl J Med,
    2005;353:2135–47.

  33. Houben R, Becker JC, Kappel A, et al., Constitutive activation
    of the Ras-Raf signaling pathway in metastatic melanoma is
    associated with poor prognosis, J Carcinog, 2004;3:6.

  34. Long GV, Menzies AM, Nagrial AM, et al., Prognostic and
    clinicopathologic associations of oncogenic BRAF in
    metastatic melanoma, J Clin Oncol, 2011;29:1239–46.

  35. Sauter ER, Yeo UC, von Stemm A, et al., Cyclin D1 is a
    candidate oncogene in cutaneous melanoma, Cancer Res,
    2002;62:3200–6.

  36. Chernoff KA, Bordone L, Horst B, et al., GAB2 amplifications
    refine molecular classification of melanoma, Clin Cancer Res,
    2009;15:4288–91.

  37. Edlundh-Rose E, Egyhazi S, Omholt K, et al., NRAS and BRAF
    mutations in melanoma tumours in relation to clinical
    characteristics: a study based on mutation screening by
    pyrosequencing, Melanoma Res, 2006;16:471–8.

  38. Bollag G, Hirth P, Tsai J, et al., Clinical efficacy of a RAF
    inhibitor needs broad target blockade in BRAF-mutant
    melanoma, Nature, 2010;467:596–9.

  39. Smalley KS, Sondak VK, Melanoma–an unlikely poster child for
    personalized cancer therapy, N Engl J Med, 2010;363:876–8.

  40. Sosman JA, Kim KB, Schuchter L, et al., Survival in BRAF
    V600-mutant advanced melanoma treated with vemurafenib,
    N Engl J Med, 2012;366:707–14.

  41. Chapman PB, Hauschild A, Robert C, et al., Updated overall
    survival (OS) results for BRIM-3, a phase III randomized, openlabel,
    multicenter trial comparing BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib
    (vem) with dacarbazine (DTIC) in previously untreated patients
    with BRAFV600E-mutated melanoma, J Clin Oncol,
    2012;30(suppl; abstr 8502).

  42. Su F, Viros A, Milagre C, et al., RAS mutations in cutaneous
    squamous-cell carcinomas in patients treated with BRAF
    inhibitors, N Engl J Med, 2012;366:207–15.

  43. Aplin AE, Kaplan FM, Shao Y, Mechanisms of resistance to
    RAF inhibitors in melanoma, J Invest Dermatol,
    2011;131:1817–20.

  44. Poulikakos PI, Persaud Y, Janakiraman M, et al., RAF inhibitor
    resistance is mediated by dimerization of aberrantly spliced
    BRAF(V600E), Nature, 2011;480:387–90.

  45. Falchook GS, Long GV, Kurzrock R, et al., Dabrafenib in
    patients with melanoma, untreated brain metastases, and
    other solid tumours: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial, Lancet,
    2012;379:1893–901.

  46. Robert C, Flaherty KT, Hersey P, et al., METRIC phase III study:
    Efficacy of trametinib (T), a potent and selective MEK inhibitor
    (MEKi), in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival
    (OS), compared with chemotherapy (C) in patients (pts) with
    BRAFV600E/K mutant advanced or metastatic melanoma
    (MM), J Clin Oncol, 2012;30 (suppl; abstr LBA8509).

  47. Weber JS, Flaherty KT, Infante JR, et al., Updated safety and
    efficacy results from a phase I/II study of the oral BRAF
    inhibitor dabrafenib (GSK2118436) combined with the oral
    MEK 1/2 inhibitor trametinib (GSK1120212) in patients with
    BRAFi-naive metastatic melanoma, J Clin Oncol,
    2012;30 (suppl; abstr 8510).

  48. Garrido MC, Bastian BC, KIT as a therapeutic target in
    melanoma, J Invest Dermatol, 2010;130:20–7.

  49. Guo J, Si L, Kong Y, et al., Phase II, open-label, single-arm trial
    of imatinib mesylate in patients with metastatic melanoma
    harboring c-Kit mutation or amplification, J Clin Oncol,
    2011;29:2904–9.

  50. Carvajal RD, Antonescu CR, Wolchok JD, et al., KIT as a
    therapeutic target in metastatic melanoma, JAMA,
    2011;305:2327–34.

  51. Anderson S, Bloom KJ, Vallera DU, et al., Multisite Analytic
    Performance Studies of a Real-Time Polymerase Chain
    Reaction Assay for the Detection of BRAF V600E Mutations in
    Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Specimens of
    Malignant Melanoma, Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2012.

  52. Yancovitz M, Litterman A, Yoon J, et al., Intra- and inter-tumor
    heterogeneity of BRAF(V600E))mutations in primary and
    metastatic melanoma, PLoS One, 2012;7:e29336.

  53. Joseph RW, Sullivan RJ, Harrell R, et al., Correlation of NRAS
    mutations with clinical response to high-dose IL-2 in patients
    with advanced melanoma, J Immunother, 2012;35:66–72.

  54. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, IL-2 “SELECT” Tissue Collection
    Protocol in Patients With Advanced Melanoma (NCT01288963).
    2011. Available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/
    NCT01288963 (accessed February 27, 2012).

  55. Maker AV, Phan GQ, Attia P, et al., Tumor regression and
    autoimmunity in patients treated with cytotoxic T
    lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 blockade and interleukin 2:
    a phase I/II study, Ann Surg Oncol, 2005;12:1005–16.

  56. Prieto PA, Yang JC, Sherry RM, et al., CTLA-4 Blockade with
    Ipilimumab: Long-Term Follow-up of 177 Patients with
    Metastatic Melanoma, Clin Cancer Res, 2012.

  57. Hodi FS, Friedlander PA, Atkins MB, et al., A phase I trial of
    ipilimumab plus bevacizumab in patients with unresectable
    stage III or stage IV melanoma, J Clin Oncol,
    2011;29:Abstract 8511.

  58. Schwartzentruber DJ, Lawson DH, Richards JM, et al., gp100
    peptide vaccine and interleukin-2 in patients with advanced
    melanoma, N Engl J Med, 2011;364:2119–27.

  59. Seung SK, Curti BD, Crittenden M, et al., Phase 1 study of
    stereotactic body radiotherapy and interleukin-2–tumor and
    immunological responses, Sci Transl Med, 2012;4:137ra74.

  60. Postow MA, Callahan MK, Barker CA, et al., Immunologic
    correlates of the abscopal effect in a patient with melanoma,
    N Engl J Med, 2012;366:925–31.

  61. Paraiso KH, Fedorenko IV, Cantini LP, et al., Recovery of
    phospho-ERK activity allows melanoma cells to escape
    from BRAF inhibitor therapy, Br J Cancer,
    2010;102:1724–30.

  62. Ribas A, Tumor immunotherapy directed at PD-1, N Engl J Med,
    2012;366:2517–9.

  63. Colombino M, Capone M, Lissia A, et al., BRAF/NRAS Mutation
    Frequencies Among Primary Tumors and Metastases in
    Patients With Melanoma, J Clin Oncol, 2012.

  64. Stark MS, Woods SL, Gartside MG, et al., Frequent somatic
    mutations in MAP3K5 and MAP3K9 in metastatic melanoma
    identified by exome sequencing, Nat Genet, 2011;44:165–9.

  65. Tran A, Tawbi HA, A potential role for nilotinib in KIT-mutated
    melanoma, Expert Opin Investig Drugs, 2012;21:861–9.

3

Article Information

Disclosure

Rene Gonzalez has received research funding from Roche/Genentech, GSK, Prometheus, consultancy fees from Roche/Genentech, GSK, Prometheus, and speaking fees from Roche/Genentech and Prometheus. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Correspondence

Rene Gonzalez, MD, FACP, Professor of Medicine, Director, Melanoma Research Clinics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Division of Medical Oncology, Mail Stop F703, 1665 Aurora Court, Aurora, CO 80045, US. E: Rene.Gonzalez@ucdenver.edu

Received

2012-08-20T00:00:00

4

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Close Popup