Trending Topic

3 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked

It is with great pleasure that we present the latest edition of touchREVIEWS in Oncology & Haematology. This issue highlights the remarkable progress and innovation shaping the fields of oncology and haematology, featuring articles that delve into both emerging therapies and the evolving understanding of complex malignancies. We open with an editorial by Mohammad Ammad […]

Hodgkin’s Lymphoma in Adolescents and Young Adults

Laura Rodriguez, Angela Punnett
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Published Online: Jun 25th 2012 Oncology & Hematology Review (US), 2012;8(2):116-122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17925/OHR.2012.08.2.116
Select a Section…
1

Abstract

Overview

Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) are defined as those individuals between the ages of 15 and 39 years. Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) is the most common cancer observed in AYAs. Over the last two decades, significant improvements in both survival from HL and the reduction of therapy-related late effects have resulted from the work of collaborative study groups in pediatric and adult domains. The adolescent and young adult (AYA) population falls between these domains. AYA patients are in a critical developmental transition, with significant psychosocial challenges that may impact on the outcome of the primary treatment as well as on the medical care and surveillance of long-term sequelae in survivors. This article will examine available literature regarding outcomes for HL in the AYA population, identifying issues unique to this group, therapeutic options, and specific concerns in follow-up.

Keywords

Hodgkin’s lymphoma, therapy, late effects, adolescents and young adults, second malignancies

2

Article

Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) are defined as those individuals between the ages of 15 and 39 years.1 AYAs with cancer are considered a vulnerable group, in large part due to psychosocial challenges in this population, including lack of insurance, low rates of clinical trial enrollment, issues pertaining to independence, and concerns about body image and fertility. The resulting delays in seeking appropriate medical care, delays in diagnosis, and subsequent compliance issues during treatment complicate medical management of cancer among AYAs.2–5 The most recent US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data indicate less survival improvement in AYAs with cancer compared with children and older adults.6

Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) is the most common cancer observed among AYAs.6 There is a slight overall male predominance in this age group, with a male:female ratio of 1.2.6–9 Prior history of infection with Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) has been associated with an increased risk of HL.10 Among AYAs, however, molecular studies show that EBV is related to HL in only a minority of cases and that it is unlikely to play a major etiologic role.11,12 The most common histological subtype of HL among the adolescent and young adult (AYA) population is nodular sclerosing classical HL, occurring in 50–80 % of patients.7–9,13,14 Over the past decades, the prognosis of HL has dramatically improved,15 but the optimal treatment of AYA patients remains undefined and patients continue to be treated on many different regimens with either pediatric or adult protocols. We will examine available literature regarding outcomes for the AYA population and discuss the therapy-related long-term sequelae.

Studies Examining Adolescent and Young Adult Outcomes
Studies focusing specifically on AYAs diagnosed with HL are scarce. Reviewing the literature, we found eight studies, and their main characteristics are summarized in Table 1. A UK study analyzed adolescents diagnosed with HL between 1970 and 1997 who received treatment with adult-type protocols.16 The OS at 5 and 20 years was 90% and 84% for stage I-IIA HL and 72% and 54% respectively for more advanced disease. However, the event-free survival (EFS) at five and 20 years was 59 % and 52 % in stage I–IIA disease, falling to 41 % and 31% in more advanced disease. The authors highlight that EFS is a more reliable measure of treatment efficacy than OS.

To view the full article in PDF or eBook formats, please click on the icons above.

2

References

  1. Bleyer A, Barr R, Hayes-Lattin B, et al., The distinctive biology
    of cancer in adolescents and young adults, Nat Rev Cancer,
    2008;8(4):288–98.

  2. Butow P, Palmer S, Pai A, Goodenough B, et al., Review of
    adherence-related issues in adolescents and young adults
    with cancer, J Clin Oncol, 2010;28(32):4800–9.

  3. Burke ME, Albritton K, Marina N, Challenges in the recruitment
    of adolescents and young adults to cancer clinical trials,
    Cancer, 2007;110(11):2385–93.

  4. Zebrack B, Bleyer A, Albritton K, et al., Assessing the health
    care needs of adolescent and young adult cancer patients and
    survivors, Cancer, 2006;107(12):2915–23.

  5. Martin S, Ulrich C, Munsell M, et al., Delays in cancer
    diagnosis in underinsured young adults and older adolescents,
    Oncologist, 2007;12(7):816–24.

  6. Howlader N NA, Krapcho M, Neyman N, et al. (eds.), SEER
    Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2008, Bethesda, MD: National
    Cancer Institute, 2011. Available at: https://seer.cancer.gov/
    csr/1975_2008/ (accessed August 17, 2012).

  7. Foltz LM, Song KW, Connors JM, Hodgkin’s lymphoma in
    adolescents, J Clin Oncol, 2006;24(16):2520–6.

  8. Eichenauer DA, Bredenfeld H, Haverkamp H, et al., Hodgkin’s
    lymphoma in adolescents treated with adult protocols: a
    report from the German Hodgkin study group, J Clin Oncol,
    2009;27(36):6079–85.

  9. Koumarianou AA, Xiros N, Papageorgiou E, et al., Survival
    improvement of young patients, aged 16-23, with Hodgkin
    lymphoma (HL) during the last three decades, Anticancer Res,
    2007;27(2):1191–7.

  10. Alexander FE, Jarrett RF, Lawrence D, et al., Risk factors for
    Hodgkin’s disease by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status: prior
    infection by EBV and other agents, Br J Cancer,
    2000;82(5):1117–21.

  11. Armstrong AA, Alexander FE, Cartwright R, et al., Epstein-Barr
    virus and Hodgkin’s disease: further evidence for the three
    disease hypothesis, Leukemia, 1998;12(8):1272–6.

  12. Gallagher A, Perry J, Freeland J, et al., Hodgkin lymphoma and
    Epstein-Barr virus (EBV): no evidence to support hit-and-run
    mechanism in cases classified as non-EBV-associated,
    Int J Cancer, 2003;104(5):624–30.

  13. National Cancer Institute, Childhood Hodgkin Lymphoma
    Treatment (PDQ®), Cellular Classification and Biologic
    Correlates. Available at: www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/
    pdq/treatment/childhodgkins/HealthProfessional/page2
    (accessed August 17, 2012).

  14. Muller J, Illes A, Molnar Z, et al., Adolescent hodgkin
    lymphoma: are treatment results more favorable with
    pediatric than with adult regimens? J Pediatr Hematol Oncol,
    2011;33(2):e60–3.

  15. Diehl V, Hodgkin’s disease – from pathology specimen to
    cure. N Engl J Med, 2007;357(19):1968–71.

3

Article Information

Disclosure

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Correspondence

Angela Punnett, MD, Division of Haematology/Oncology, SickKids Hospital, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8, Canada. E: angela.punnett@sickkids.ca

Received

2012-08-22T00:00:00

4

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Close Popup