Home > Article > Individualized Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma— The Evolving Role of Molecular-subtype-specific Therapy
Haematological Malignancies, Lymphoma
Read Time: 3 mins

Individualized Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma— The Evolving Role of Molecular-subtype-specific Therapy

Published Online: November 20th 2015 Oncology & Hematology Review, 2015;11(2):113–4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17925/OHR.2015.11.02.113
Authors: Gita Thanarajasingam, Nabila Bennani-Baiti, Grzegorz S Nowakowski
Quick Links:
Abstract
Article
Article Information
Abstract:
Overview

Individualized treatment of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is within reach given advancements in molecular techniques and the development of novel, targeted drugs. Two biologically distinct subtypes, germinal center B-cell (GCB) DLBCL and activated B-cell (ABC) DLBCL, display differences in outcome and response to therapy. ABC-DLBCL confers poorer prognosis. Several targeted agents show promising activity in this group. Molecular-subtype is a prognostic and therapy-related biomarker that can guide personalized frontline therapy to improve outcomes in DLBCL.

Keywords

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), cell of origin (COO), outcomes, therapy

Article:

Individualized treatment of patients with malignancy is feasible in modern oncology due to improved molecular techniques and the development of novel, targeted agents. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Standard frontline therapy consists of combined immunochemotherapy with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). Although outcomes for patients with DLBCL improved significantly with the addition of rituximab to the standard cytotoxic chemotherapy backbone over a decade ago, they have largely remained stable since that time. Approximately 40 % of DLBCL patients will develop relapsed or refractory disease.1,2 Most patients in this setting succumb to their disease despite salvage treatments, suggesting that the highest impact area for improvement is first-line therapy.3 Recent advances in molecular characterization techniques have deepened the understanding of the biology of DLBCL and paved the way for personalized therapies aimed at improving outcomes in this disease.

Gene expression profiling of DLBCL has identified two distinct subtypes classified by the malignant cell of origin (COO): germinal center B-cell (GCB) and non-GCB DLBCL, the latter of which is further categorized into activated B-cell (ABC) DLBCL and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma.4 ABC-DLBCL displays chronic active B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling and is associated with inferior clinical outcome, while GCB-DLBCL is associated with better outcomes and a pathogenesis that may involve epigenetic changes and the anti-apoptotic B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) family of proteins.5,6 Immunohistochemical and gene expression profiling methods that permit real-time assessment of COO on paraffin-embedded tissue are now available, and therefore molecular subtyping of DLBCL is increasingly feasible in the clinic. Additionally, increased understanding of signaling pathways, genetic mutations, and biomarkers in lymphomagenesis has driven a rapid expansion of novel, biologically targeted therapies with differential activity in specific DLBCL subtypes, particularly in ABC-DLBCL. Molecular subtype in DLBCL is therefore both a prognostic and a therapyrelated biomarker.

Multiple classes of novel agents targeting the BCR pathway or its downstream constituents have been investigated in clinical trials, with emphasis on efficacy in ABC-DLBCL. These include immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors, and BCR signaling pathway inhibitors. IMiDs such as lenalidomide may enhance antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), inhibit production of inflammatory cytokines, and decrease nuclear transcription factor kappa B (NFκB) activity.7,8 Phase II studies have demonstrated the efficacy of single-agent lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory NHL, with significantly improved response rates and progression-free survival observed in non-GCBDLBCL. 9 Proteasome inhibitors, such as bortezomib, suppress the NFκB pathway, which is constitutively activated in ABC-DLBCL. Bortezomib was one of the first agents to show promising results in relapsed and refractory disease based on molecular subtype.10 Lastly, as anticipated, given the central role of BCR signaling in the pathogenesis of ABCDLBCL, BCR pathway inhibitors such as ibrutinib have also demonstrated encouraging response rates in the relapsed and refractory setting.11

Patients with GCB-DLBCL have better clinical outcomes than those with ABC subtype, but relapse after initial chemotherapy is associated with poor outcome regardless of COO. Most agents active in ABCDLBCL appear to have little activity in the GCB subtype. However, BCL-2 proteins appear to be overexpressed in GCB-DLBCL and are a promising therapeutic target. Synergistic combinations of the BCL-2 inhibitor ABT- 199 with signaling pathway inhibitors have shown promise in preclinical studies and are being investigated in clinical trials.12

The current focus in DLBCL therapy is to move these promising, targeted agents to the frontline setting to truly influence outcome. The ultimate goal is to use molecular subtype in DLBCL as a biomarker that effectively identifies patients who will benefit from the addition of a specific targeted agent (or combination of agents) to an initial, individualized immunochemotherapy. This supports the rationale for clinical trials comparing standard R-CHOP to R-CHOP plus a targeted agent (XR-CHOP) in the DLBCL subtypes. There are a several ongoing randomized phase II and III studies assessing the efficacy of R-CHOP in combination with bortezomib, lenalidomide, ibrutinib, and others.13 E1412 (NCT01856192) and DLC002 (NCT02285062), two ongoing trials testing the addition of lenalidomide to standard immunochemotherapy in newly diagnosed DLBCL, are currently accruing. The PHOENIX trial (NCT01855750), evaluating the addition of ibrutinib in DLBCL, and the REMoDL-B study (NCT01324596), assessing added bortezomib, have both completed accrual. Many additional novel, targeted agents are in development.14 The addition of these new agents has the potential to overcome the adverse prognosis of non-GCB subtype DLBCL.15 Patient participation in molecular-subtype specific clinical trials should be encouraged as our knowledge on the most effective combinations of targeted agents with immunochemotherapy deepens. Personalized frontline therapy is on the horizon with promise to improve outcomes in DLBCL and change the face of this challenging and biologically complex disease.

Article Information:
Disclosure

Gita Thanarajasingam, MD, and Nabila Bennani-Baiti, MD, have no conflicts of interests to declare. Grzegorz S Nowakowski, MD, receives research funding support from Celgene. No funding was received in the publication of this article.

Correspondence

Gita Thanarajasingam, MD, Division of Hematology Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905. E: [email protected]

Open Access

This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, adaptation, and
reproduction provided the original author(s) and source are given appropriate credit.

Received

2015-09-02T00:00:00

References

1. Sehn LH, Donaldson J, Chhanabhai M, et al., Introduction of combined CHOP plus rituximab therapy dramatically improved outcome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in British Columbia, J Clin Oncol, 2005;23:5027–33
2. Coiffier B, Thieblemont C, Van Den Neste E, et al., Longterm outcome of patients in the LNH-98.5 trial, the first randomized study comparing rituximab-CHOP to standard CHOP chemotherapy in DLBCL patients: a study by the Groupe d’Etudes des Lymphomes de l’Adulte, Blood, 2010;116:2040–5.
3. Maurer MJ, Ghesquières H, Jais J-P, et al., Event-free survival at 24 months is a robust end point for disease-related outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with immunochemotherapy, J Clin Oncol, 2014;32:1066–73.
4. Rosenwald A, Wright G, Chan WC, et al., The use of molecular profiling to predict survival after chemotherapy for diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma, New Engl J Med, 2002;346:1937–47.
5. Davis RE, Ngo VN, Lenz G, et al., Chronic active B-cellreceptor signalling in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Nature, 2010;463:88–92.
6. Lenz G, Wright G, Dave SS, et al., Stromal gene signatures in large-B-cell lymphomas, New Engl J Med, 2008;359:2313–23.
7. Yang Y, Shaffer AL, 3rd, Emre NC, et al., Exploiting synthetic lethality for the therapy of ABC diffuse large B cell lymphoma, Cancer Cell, 2012;21:723–37.
8. Thieblemont C, Delfau-Larue MH, Coiffier B, Lenalidomide in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Adv Hematol, 2012;2012:861060.
9. Hernandez-Ilizaliturri FJ, Deeb G, Zinzani PL, et al., Higher response to lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in nongerminal center B-cell-like than in germinal center B-cell-like phenotype, Cancer, 2011;117:5058–66.
10. Dunleavy K, Pittaluga S, Czuczman MS, et al., Differential efficacy of bortezomib plus chemotherapy within molecular subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Blood, 2009;113:6069–76.
11. Wilson WH, Young RM, Schmitz R, et al., Targeting B cell receptor signaling with ibrutinib in diffuse large B cell lymphoma, Nat Med, 2015;21:922–6.
12. Li L, Pongtornpipat P, Tiutan T, et al., Synergistic induction of apoptosis in high-risk DLBCL by BCL2 inhibition with ABT-199 combined with pharmacologic loss of MCL1, Leukemia, 2015;29:1702–12.
13. Nowakowski GS, Czuczman MS, ABC, GCB, and double-hit diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Does subtype make a difference in therapy selection?, Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book, 2015;35:e449–57.
14. Roschewski M, Staudt LM, Wilson WH, Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma[mdash]treatment approaches in the molecular era, Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2014;11:12–23.
15. Nowakowski GS, LaPlant B, Macon WR, et al., Lenalidomide combined with R-CHOP overcomes negative prognostic impact of non-germinal center B-cell phenotype in newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A phase II study, J Clin Oncol, 2015;33:251–7.

Further Resources

Related Content In Lymphoma
  • Copied to clipboard!
    accredited arrow-downarrow_leftarrow-right-bluearrow-right-dark-bluearrow-right-greyarrow-right-orangearrow-right-whitearrow-right-blueavatarcalendarchevron-down crosscrossdownloademailexclaimationfeedbackfiltergraph-arrowinterviewslinkmenumore_dots padlock person play_buttonplay-colour-tmcplay-colourAsset 1podcastprinter scenerysearch share social_facebooksocial_googleplussocial_instagramsocial_linkedin_altsocial_linkedin_altsocial_pinterestlogo-twitter-glyph-32social_youtubeshape-star (1)tick-bluetick-orangetick-whiteticktimetranscriptup-arrowwebinar