touchONCOLOGY touchONCOLOGY
Breast Cancer
Read Time: < 1 min

The Intriguing Role of Bevacizumab in Advanced Breast Cancer – The Search Continues

Copy Link
Published Online: May 15th 2012 European Oncology & Haematology, 2012;8(3):179-183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17925/EOH.2012.08.3.179
Authors: José Pablo Leone, Ricardo H Álvarez
Quick Links:
Abstract
Article
Article Information
Abstract:
Overview

Angiogenesis plays an important role in the biology of tumour progression and therapies that target the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathways – ligands, receptors and co-receptors – have become an important treatment for many types of cancer. Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against VEGF, was explored in several randomised Phase III studies conducted in patients with metastatic breast cancer. However, despite bringing improvements in progression-free survival, the use of bevacizumab has not been associated with improvements in overall survival. Further improvements in predictive biomarkers and the development of biology-driven Phase II trials will be critical to help us understand which patients would benefit the most from anti-angiogenic therapy.

Keywords

Bevacizumab, breast cancer, anti-angiogenesis, vascular endothelial growth factor

Article:

Breast cancer continues to be a very prevalent disease worldwide. It is estimated that more than 39,000 women died of breast cancer in the US in 2011.1 Advances in the treatment of early-stage disease, including screening programmes for breast cancer detection and adjuvant systemic therapies, have improved outcomes for patients. Despite these improvements, however, many women ultimately develop metastatic breast cancer (MBC), which is essentially an incurable disease. The prognosis of patients with MBC has changed little over the past decade; the majority of patients succumb to their disease within two years of diagnosis.2–4 Novel treatments for patients with MBC are needed to improve the control of disease and prevent symptoms while minimising toxicity.

Role of Angiogenesis in Cancer Biology
In 1970, Folkman postulated that tumour progression might be dependent on angiogenesis – the formation of new blood vessels.5 The hypothesis was that a tumour cannot grow without blood supply and that, therefore, the inhibition of angiogenesis would be an important treatment for all cancers.

Angiogenesis is an important natural process of new blood vessel formation that occurs in the body, both in health and in disease.6 Thegeneration and growth of solid tumours depend on an intact vascular supply, which is stimulated by several pro-angiogenic factors. Changes in the finely balanced equilibrium between angiogenicstimulators and inhibitors that regulate angiogenesis are linked to a broad range of angiogenesis-dependent diseases, including both cancer and non-neoplastic diseases.7 Angiogenesis is now recognised as one of the key steps in the pathogenesis of cancer, regulating several events required for tumour development, invasion and metastasis.8,9

To view the full article in PDF or eBook formats, please click on the icons above.

Article Information:
Disclosure

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Correspondence

Ricardo H Álvarez, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Unit 1354, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, PO Box 301439, Houston, Texas 77030-3721, US. E: ralvarez@mdanderson.org

Received

2012-03-12T00:00:00

References

  1. American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts and Figures 2011, Atlanta, Georgia, US: American Cancer Society, 2011.
  2. Greenberg PA, Hortobagyi GN, Smith TL, et al., Long-term follow-up of patients with complete remission following combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer, J Clin Oncol, 1996;14:2197–205.
  3. Dawood S, Broglio K, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, et al., Trends in survival over the past two decades among white and black patients with newly diagnosed stage IV breast cancer, J Clin Oncol, 2008;26:4891–8.
  4. Chia SK, Speers CH, D'yachkova Y, et al., The impact of new chemotherapeutic and hormone agents on survival in a population-based cohort of women with metastatic breast cancer, Cancer, 2007;110:973–9.
  5. Folkman J, Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications, N Engl J Med, 1971;285:1182–6.
  6. Alvarez RH, Guarneri V, Icli F, et al., Bevacizumab treatment for advanced breast cancer, Oncologist, 2011;16:1684–97.
  7. Carmeliet P, Jain RK, Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases, Nature, 2000;407:249–57.
  8. Gasparini G, Prognostic value of vascular endothelial growth factor in breast cancer, Oncologist, 2000;5(Suppl. 1):37–44.
  9. Folkman J, What is the evidence that tumors are angiogenesis dependent?, J Natl Cancer Inst, 1990;82:4–6.
  10. Ellis LM, Epidermal growth factor receptor in tumor angiogenesis, Hematol Oncol Clin North Am, 2004;18:1007–21,viii.
  11. Heath VL, Bicknell R, Anticancer strategies involving the vasculature, Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2009;6:395–404.
  12. Hanahan D, Folkman J, Patterns and emerging mechanisms of the angiogenic switch during tumorigenesis, Cell, 1996;86:353–64.
  13. Folkman J, Klagsbrun M, Angiogenic factors, Science, 1987;235:442–7.
  14. Dameron KM, Volpert OV, Tainsky MA, Bouck N, Control of angiogenesis in fibroblasts by p53 regulation of thrombospondin-1, Science, 1994;265:1582–4.
  15. Ebos JM, Kerbel RS, Antiangiogenic therapy: impact on invasion, disease progression, and metastasis, Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2011;8:210–21.
  16. Pàez-Ribes M, Allen E, Hudock J, et al., Antiangiogenic therapy elicits malignant progression of tumors to increased local invasion and distant metastasis, Cancer Cell, 2009;15:220–31.
  17. Desar IM, Mulder SF, Stillebroer AB, et al., The reverse side of the victory: flare up of symptoms after discontinuation of sunitinib or sorafenib in renal cell cancer patients. A report of three cases, Acta Oncol, 2009;48:927–31.
  18. Miles D, Harbeck N, Escudier B, et al., Disease course patterns after discontinuation of bevacizumab: pooled analysis of randomized phase III trials, J Clin Oncol, 2011;29:83–8.
  19. Relf M, LeJeune S, Scott PA, et al., Expression of the angiogenic factors vascular endothelial cell growth factor, acidic and basic fibroblast growth factor, tumor growth factor beta-1, platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor, placenta growth factor, and pleiotrophin in human primary breast cancer and its relation to angiogenesis, Cancer Res, 1997;57:963–9.
  20. Konecny GE, Meng YG, Untch M, et al., Association between HER-2/neu and vascular endothelial growth factor expression predicts clinical outcome in primary breast cancer patients, Clin Cancer Res, 2004;10:1706–16.
  21. Linderholm BK, Hellborg H, Johansson U, et al., Significantly higher levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and shorter survival times for patients with primary operable triple-negative breast cancer, Ann Oncol, 2009;20:1639–46.
  22. Alvarez RH, Valero V, Hortobagyi GN, Emerging targeted therapies for breast cancer, J Clin Oncol, 2010;28:3366–79.
  23. Gerber HP, Ferrara N, Pharmacology and pharmacodynamics of bevacizumab as monotherapy or in combination with cytotoxic therapy in preclinical studies, Cancer Res, 2005;65:671–80.
  24. Kim KJ, Li B, Winer J, et al., Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor-induced angiogenesis suppresses tumour growth in vivo, Nature, 1993;362:841–4.
  25. Gianni L, Romieu G, Lichinitser M, et al., First results of AVEREL, a randomized phase III trial to evaluate bevacizumab (BEV) in combination with trastuzumab (H) + docetaxel (DOC) as first-line therapy for HER2-positive locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (LR/mBC), Cancer Res, 2011;71(Suppl. 24):S4–S8.
  26. Gordon MS, Margolin K, Talpaz M, et al., Phase I safety and pharmacokinetic study of recombinant human anti-vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with advanced cancer, J Clin Oncol, 2001;19:843–50.
  27. Margolin K, Gordon MS, Holmgren E, et al., Phase Ib trial of intravenous recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor in combination with chemotherapy in patients with advanced cancer: pharmacologic and long-term safety data, J Clin Oncol, 2001;19:851–6.
  28. Miller KD, Chap LI, Holmes FA, et al., Randomized phase III trial of capecitabine compared with bevacizumab plus capecitabine in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer, J Clin Oncol, 2005;23:792–9.
  29. Miller K, Wang M, Gralow J, et al., Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer, N Engl J Med, 2007;357:2666–76.
  30. Miles DW, Chan A, Dirix LY, et al., Phase III study of bevacizumab plus docetaxel compared with placebo plus docetaxel for the first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer, J Clin Oncol, 2010;28:3239–47.
  31. Robert NJ, Diéras V, Glaspy J, et al., RIBBON-1: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer, J Clin Oncol, 2011;29:1252–60.
  32. Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Hortobagyi GN, Optimal schedule of paclitaxel: weekly is better, J Clin Oncol, 2008;26:1585–7.
  33. Burstein HJ, Bevacizumab for advanced breast cancer: all tied up with a RIBBON? J Clin Oncol, 2011;29:1232–5.
  34. Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Hortobagyi GN, Ellis LM, Targeted therapies: peaking beneath the surface of recent bevacizumab trials, Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2011;8:319–20.
  35. European Medicines Agency (EMA), EPAR (European public assessment report) summary for the public, Avastin, bevacizumab (EMA/349719/2011, EMEA/H/C/000582), November 2011. Available at: www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/ EPAR_-_Summary_for_the_public/human/000582/ WC500029260.pdf (accessed 23 May 2012).
  36. Smith IE, Pierga JY, Biganzoli L, et al., First-line bevacizumab plus taxane-based chemotherapy for locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: safety and efficacy in an openlabel study in 2,251 patients, Ann Oncol, 2011;22:595–602.
  37. Gray R, Bhattacharya S, Bowden C, et al., Independent review of E2100: a phase III trial of bevacizumab plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel in women with metastatic breast cancer, J Clin Oncol, 2009;27:4966–72.
  38. Albain KS, Nag SM, Calderillo-Ruiz G, et al., Gemcitabine plus Paclitaxel versus Paclitaxel monotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer and prior anthracycline treatment, J Clin Oncol, 2008;26:3950–7.
  39. O'Shaughnessy J, Miles D, Vukelja S, et al., Superior survival with capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy in anthracycline-pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer: phase III trial results, J Clin Oncol, 2002;20:2812–23.
  40. Chan S, Romieu G, Huober J, et al., Phase III study of gemcitabine plus docetaxel compared with capecitabine plus docetaxel for anthracycline-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer, J Clin Oncol, 2009;27:1753–60.
  41. Hamilton A, Hortobagyi G, Chemotherapy: what progress in the last 5 years? J Clin Oncol, 2005;23:1760–75.
  42. Brufsky AM, Hurvitz S, Perez E, et al., RIBBON-2: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy for second-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer, J Clin Oncol, 2011;29:4286–93.
  43. Citeline, TrialTrove, 2012. Available at: https://informa.citeline.com
  44. Boneberg EM, Legler DF, Hoefer MM, et al., Angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis are downregulated in primary breast cancer, Br J Cancer, 2009;101:605–14.
  45. Dudley AC, Tumor endothelial cells, Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med, 2012;2:a006536.
  46. Aird WC, Endothelial cell heterogeneity, Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med, 2012;2:a006429.
  47. Fojo T, Wilkerson J, Bevacizumab and breast cancer: the E2100 outlier, Lancet Oncol, 2010;11:1117–9.

Further Resources

Share this Article
Related Content In Breast Cancer
  • Copied to clipboard!
    accredited arrow-down-editablearrow-downarrow_leftarrow-right-bluearrow-right-dark-bluearrow-right-greenarrow-right-greyarrow-right-orangearrow-right-whitearrow-right-bluearrow-up-orangeavatarcalendarchevron-down consultant-pathologist-nurseconsultant-pathologistcrosscrossdownloademailexclaimationfeedbackfiltergraph-arrowinterviewslinkmdt_iconmenumore_dots nurse-consultantpadlock patient-advocate-pathologistpatient-consultantpatientperson pharmacist-nurseplay_buttonplay-colour-tmcplay-colourAsset 1podcastprinter scenerysearch share single-doctor social_facebooksocial_googleplussocial_instagramsocial_linkedin_altsocial_linkedin_altsocial_pinterestlogo-twitter-glyph-32social_youtubeshape-star (1)tick-bluetick-orangetick-red tick-whiteticktimetranscriptup-arrowwebinar Sponsored Department Location NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-07NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-08NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-09NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-10NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-11NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-12Salary £ TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-01TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-02TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-03TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-04TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-05TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-06TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-07TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-08TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-09TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-10TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-11TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-12TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-13TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-14TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-15TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-16TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-17TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-18TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-19TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-20TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-21TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-22TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-23TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-24TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-25TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-26TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-27TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-28TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-29TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-30TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-31TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-32TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-33TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-34TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-35TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-36TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-37TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-38TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-39TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-40TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-41TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-42TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-43TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-44TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-45TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-46TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-47TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-48TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-49TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-50TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-51TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-52TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-53TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-54TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-55TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-56TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-57TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-58TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-59TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-60TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-61TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-62TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-63TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-64TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-65TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-66TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-67TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-68TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-69TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-70TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-71TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-72