Trending Topic

Inflammation of the breast in women. Female breasts with signs of the disease. A low-poly construction of interconnected lines and points. Blue background.
5 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Mohammad Ammad Ud Din, Hania Liaqat, Ayesha Tayyab

The incidence rate of breast cancer (BC) is the highest in Pakistan among all Asian countries.1 In 2018 alone, 2.1 million cases were diagnosed, although the exact number is likely much higher due to poor reporting in rural areas and the lack of a formal national cancer registry.1,2 Over the last decade, multiple non-governmental organizations and large […]

Drug-eluting Beads in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Colorectal Cancer Metastases to the Liver

Jacques Blümmel, Sven Reinhardt, Markus Schäfer, Carl Gilbert, Lee Sun, Jane Ren
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Published Online: May 15th 2012 European Oncology & Haematology, 2012;8(3):162-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17925/EOH.2012.08.3.162
Select a Section…
1

Abstract

Overview

Drug-eluting beads (DEBs) may become a standard of care in the treatment of unresectable liver cancers. DEBs have a significant advantage by offering simultaneous embolisation, and sustained release of antineoplastic agents in a controlled manner, resulting in a localisation of the drug in the targeted tumour, while minimising its systemic exposure. This article reviews current treatment options for liver cancer and concentrates on the benefits of DEBs for patients with unresectable liver cancer. Preclinical and clinical studies suggest smaller microspheres and extended release characteristics as key properties that will enable DEB device technologies to become a standard of care for unresectable liver cancer. A new, tightly size-calibrated DEB ≤100 μm, Embozene TANDEM™, was designed to meet these requirements.

Keywords

Drug-eluting bead, microspheres, transarterial chemoembolisation, hepatocellular carcinoma, colorectal cancer metastases

2

Article

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver malignancy (70–85 %)1 with an associated mortality of >600,000 per year.2,3 Underlying cirrhosis is the major risk factor,2 with an estimated annual risk of developing HCC of 4–8 %.2,4 Hepatitis B is responsible for 53–80 % of all cases.2 Hepatitis C is the major cause of HCC in Japan, the US, Latin America and Europe.3 Untreated HCC patients have a median survival of 3–8 months.5

Nearly one million patients are diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) worldwide every year.6 Thirty to fifty percent of them develop hepatic metastases (hmCRC);6–8 hmCRC is responsible for two-thirds of CRC deaths.8 One- and five-year survival rates for untreated hmCRC patients are <30 % and <5 %, respectively.22

Treatment Options
The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system is commonly used for HCC.9 It takes into account underlying liver disease, tumour characteristics and general performance status.4,10 About 30 %4 ofpatients in Western countries identified as having BCLC stage 0 or A HCC are eligible for curative treatments, including liver transplantation (LT), liver resection (LR) and various ablation techniques (ATs).11

LT provides excellent outcomes applying the Milan criteria, withfive-year survival rate of 70 % and recurrence rates below 15 %.12 LT is the only curative option for the underlying cirrhosis.13,14 However, because of the shortage of potential liver donors and progression of the HCC, the risk of dropout from liver transplantation waiting lists is up to 4 % per month.15 LR is the treatment of choice for HCC in non-cirrhotic patients (~5 % of cases in Western countries, ~40 % in Asia).15 In the case of underlying cirrhosis, candidates need to be carefully selected to diminish the risk of post-operative liver failure with increased risk of death.15,16 In HCC patients after LR, the risk of tumour recurrence exceeds 70 % at five years.15

ATs include chemical (e.g., percutaneous ethanol injection [PEI]) and thermal (e.g., radiofrequency ablation [RFA]) ablation. PEI results in five-year survival rates of 47–53 % (Child–Pugh class A, early-stage tumours).17 PEI has high local recurrence rates of 33–43 %.17 For RFA, depending on Child–Pugh class and location of lesions in the liver in early-stage HCC patients, five-year survival rates of around 60 % have been reported.17

In hmCRC, unlike HCC, LR is the only potential curative standard treatment.18–20 In patients with hmCRC, LR provides five-year survival ratesin the range of 25–58 %.18 However, only 10–20 % of patients are suitable for LR.2,21 Recurrence rates for hmCRC after LR range from 60–70 %.22

To view the full article in PDF or eBook formats, please click on the icons above.

2

References

  1. Carter S, Martin Ii RCG, Drug-eluting bead therapy in
    primary and metastatic disease of the liver, HPB (Oxford),
    2009;11:541–50.

  2. Nicolini A, Crespi S, Martinetti L, Drug delivery embolization
    systems: a physician’s perspective, Expert Opin Drug Deliv,
    2011;8:1071–84.

  3. Ferenci P, Fried M, Labrecque D, et al., World Gastroenterology
    Organisation Global Guideline. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC):
    a global perspective, J Gastrointestin Liver Dis, 2010;19:311–7.

  4. Peck-Radosavljevic M, Hepatocellular carcinoma: the place
    of new medical therapies, Therap Adv Gastroenterol,
    2010;3:259–67.

  5. Cunningham SC, Choti MA, Bellavance EC, Pawlik TM,
    Palliation of hepatic tumors, Surg Oncol, 2007;16:277–91.

  6. Nordlinger B, Sorbye H, Glimelius B, et al., Perioperative
    chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 and surgery versus surgery
    alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer
    (EORTC Intergroup trial 40983): a randomised controlled
    trial, Lancet, 2008;371:1007–16.

  7. Pavlidis TE, Symeonidis NG, Psarras KK, et al., Current
    surgical management of colorectal cancer liver metastases:
    a mini review, WebmedCentral COLOPROCTOLOGY,
    2011;2:WMC002278.

  8. Van den Eynde M, Hendlisz A, Treatment of colorectal liver
    metastases: a review, Rev Recent Clin Trials, 2009;4:56–62.

  9. Llovet JM, Brú C, Bruix J, Prognosis of hepatocellular
    carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification, Semin Liver Dis,
    1999;19:329–38.

  10. Bruix J, Sherman M, Management of hepatocellular
    carcinoma: an update, Hepatology, 2011;53:1020–2.

  11. Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet JM, et al., Clinical management
    of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-
    2000 EASL conference. European Association for the Study
    of the Liver, J Hepatol, 2001;35:421–30.

  12. Llovet JM, Schwartz M, Mazzaferro V, Resection and liver
    transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma, Semin Liver Dis,
    2005;25:181–200.

  13. De Villa V, Lo CM, Liver transplantation for hepatocellular
    carcinoma in Asia, Oncologist, 2007;12:1321–31.

  14. Yao FY, Ferrell L, Bass NM, et al., Liver transplantation for
    hepatocellular carcinoma: expansion of the tumor size limits
    does not adversely impact survival, Hepatology,
    2001;33:1394–403.

  15. Bruix J, Sherman M, Management of hepatocellular
    carcinoma, Hepatology, 2005;42:1208–36.

  16. Livraghi T, Mäkisalo H, Line PD, Treatment options in
    hepatocellular carcinoma today, Scand J Surg, 2011;100:22–9.

  17. Lencioni R, Loco-regional treatment of hepatocellular
    carcinoma, Hepatology, 2010;52:762–73.

  18. Haddad AJ, Bani Hani M, Pawlik TM, Cunningham SC,
    Colorectal liver metastases, Int J Surg Oncol, 2011;2011:285840.

  19. Penna C, Nordlinger B, Surgery and local treatments of liver
    metastases from colorectal cancer: how to improve results,
    Scand J Surg, 2003;92:90–6.

  20. Simmonds PC, Primrose JN, Colquitt JL, et al., Surgical
    resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: a
    systematic review of published studies, Br J Cancer,
    2006;94:982–99.

3

Article Information

Disclosure

All authors are employees at CeloNova BioSciences, Inc.

Correspondence

Lee Sun, CeloNova BioSciences, Inc., 18615 Tuscany Stone, Suite 100, San Antonio, TX 78258, US. E: lsun@celanova.com

Support

The publication of this article was funded by CeloNova BioSciences, Inc.

Received

2012-04-20T00:00:00

4

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF

This Functionality is for
Members Only

Explore the latest in medical education and stay current in your field. Create a free account to track your learning.

Close Popup