Home > Article > Targeting Tyrosine-protein Kinase Receptor (MET) Gene Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer – The Efficacy and Safety of Tepotinib + Gefitinib in the INSIGHT Study
Lung Cancer
Read Time: 5 mins

Targeting Tyrosine-protein Kinase Receptor (MET) Gene Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer – The Efficacy and Safety of Tepotinib + Gefitinib in the INSIGHT Study

Published Online: December 19th 2019 European Oncology & Haematology. 2019;15(2):86–8
Authors: Y-Long Wu
Quick Links:
Article
Article Information
Article:

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a world-wide health issue, accounting for 85% of all lung cancers, of which there were an estimated 2.1 million new cases and 1.76 million deaths in 2018; equivalent to 11.6% of the global cancer burden.1,2 This incidence is expected to rise in the coming years as rates of smoking increase in developing countries.2 NSCLC remains more difficult to treat than many other cancer types, with a poor prognosis and limited response to many of the treatments developed in recent decades.3,4 Many patients present at an advanced disease state, decreasing the chance of treatment success. Effective treatments for this disease therefore remain a substantially urgent and unmet need.3,4

Alterations in signalling resulting from mutations in the gene expressing the c-MET receptor (MET) and its expression are key factors in the pathogenesis of NSCLC and are consequently important targets for treatments.5 Tepotinib is a highly potent and selective investigational MET inhibitor that has provided promising results in patients with NSCLC.6

Q. What is the rationale for targeting MET gene alterations in non-small cell lung cancer and why have previous studies of MET inhibitors yielded negative results?

The c-MET receptor is a membrane-spanning tyrosine kinase protein that is activated when it binds to its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), leading to downstream signalling that stimulates cell movement, cell division, angiogenesis and other functions.7,8 This process is tightly controlled via binding of c-Cbl protein that promotes breakdown of c-MET which reduces signalling pathways and inhibits these functions.9,10 A mutation in the MET gene exon14 that is associated with certain cancer types allows skipping of a 47-amino acid section of the receptor, resulting in a lack of binding of c-Cbl, over-expression of c-MET and HGF binding, leading to loss of tight control of the pathway and its functions, including cell division and metastasis.10 Given its involvement in cell division control, c-MET has been a target of interest in the development of anticancer therapies.

Some c-MET inhibitors originally showed in vitro efficacy against tumour cell lines but phase III clinical trials investigating the treatment of NSCLC with such agents, including tivantinib or onartuzumab given with or without erlotinib, have all shown disappointing outcomes and failed to improve overall survival (OS).11–13 The reasons for these failures are not entirely clear but they may result from patients with inappropriate NSCLC tumour mutation types being selected.
These trials used tumour type or protein overexpression as criteria for selecting suitable patients but these characteristics are not necessarily indicative of c-MET pathway activation and thus the treatments were ineffective in many of the recruited patients.6,14 In addition, the levels of HGF in tumour tissues may be less than those used in in vitro models, leading to an over-estimation of clinical activity.14

Q. Why is tepotinib being investigated in combination with gefitinib?

Tepotinib is an investigational, oral, highly-selective c-MET tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that targets oncogenic c-MET signalling caused by mutations in the MET gene, including MET exon 14 skipping and MET amplifications.These alterations have been identified as drivers of cancers of the breast, colon, stomach, kidney, liver, lung and thyroid.8 Tepotinib has shown promising anti-tumour activity in murine xenograft models of human NSCLC tumours.15 Gefitinib is an epidermal growth factor (EGFR) TKI to which East Asian patients with NSCLC respond very well, with an overall survival of 24–36 months.1 However, a large proportion of patients in this population have, or develop, resistance to this treatment. In addition, some of these patients (24%) also develop a MET amplification and may be suitable for a c-MET inhibitor treatment.16,17 In the phase II INSIGHT study, due to EGFR TKI resistance, we wanted to determine whether there is efficacy with a combination of an EGFR TKI (gefitinib [Iressa®, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK]) plus a c-MET inhibitor (tepotinib) in EGFR-mutant NSCLC and in the MET pathway.16,17 In this study, when patients with NSCLC developed resistance to first-line EGFR TKI (gefitinib) treatment they were randomised to either continue with gefitinib with tepotinib added, or to chemotherapy. It was hoped that this novel combination would maximise anti-cancer benefits in terms of OS and objective response rate (ORR) by inhibiting two pathways and thus decreasing or delaying the emergence of resistance and extending efficacy.

Q. Could you briefly describe the INSIGHT clinical trial and its findings?

The INSIGHT study is the only randomised study to compare tepotinib + gefitinib with chemotherapy in relapsed EGFR-mutant NSCLC with MET overexpression (IHC3+) or MET amplification. The study was conducted in Asia and recruited a total of 55 patients (age range: 42–82 years, median ages were 61.0 years or 58.3 years for those randomised to tepotinib + gefitinib or chemotherapy, respectively). Patients were required to have tumours with MET IHC3+ mutations or MET amplification. Patients received either tepotinib 500 mg + gefitinib 250 mg once daily (n=31) or chemotherapy (n=24) consisting of pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 + cisplatin 75 mg/m2 or carboplatin (area under curve [AUC] 5 or 6 intravenously on day 1).17

Data for ≥18 months of follow-up show notable benefits for the combination therapy for certain patient groups. For tepotinib + gefitinib versus chemotherapy, progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.9 versus 4.4 months in the overall population; 8.3 versus 4.4 months for patients with MET IHC3+; and 16.6 versus 4.2 months for patients with MET amplification, respectively. For ORR there was a substantial benefit in favour of the tepotinib + gefitinib combination: odds ratio (OR) 1.99 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56, 6.87) for the overall population, OR 4.33 [95% CI 1.03, 18.33] for patients with MET IHC3+ and OR 2.67 (95% CI 0.37, 19.56) for patients with MET amplifications.17

Median OS showed a similar pattern for the tepotibib + gefitinib combination versus chemotherapy group which was 17.3 versus 18.7 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.69) for the overall population, 37.3 versus 17.9 months (HR 0.33) for patients with MET IHC3+ and 37.3 versus 13.1 months (HR 0.09) for patients with MET amplification.17

The tepotinib + gefitinib group showed longer median treatment duration than the chemotherapy group (21.4 versus 18 weeks) and similar levels of dose reductions (16.1% versus 17.4%). For tepotinib + gefitinib, incidence of any grades of diarrhoea, peripheral oedema, alanine transaminase (ALT) increase, amylase increase, paronychia and lipase increase were higher compared with chemotherapy. However, rates of any grades of decreased appetite, nausea, anaemia, vomiting, blood creatinine increase, white blood-cell count decrease, neutrophil count decrease, platelet count decrease or neutropenia were lower than with chemotherapy. Overall, tepotinib + gefitinib combination was generally well tolerated and most adverse events were mild to moderate.17

Q. Which patients are most likely to respond to this combination?

The 18-month findings of the INSIGHT study are encouraging for the use of an EGFR TKI/c-MET inhibitor combination in certain patients with NSCLC. They indicate that PFS, ORR and OS were similar or only slightly improved for tepotinib + gefitinib compared with chemotherapy in the overall population.17 However, there were substantial increases in PFS, ORR and OS in patients with MET overexpression or MET amplification when treated with the combination compared with chemotherapy. The greatest increase in PFS and OS were seen in patients with MET amplification and the largest increase in ORR occurred in patients with MET overexpression. This is an important finding which indicates that patients having tumours with these aberrations are most likely to respond to tepotinib + gefitinib treatment. In addition, MET overexpression can be considered a suitable biomarker for screening patients who are suitable candidates for treatment with tepotinib.

Q. What will be the next step in the clinical development of tepotinib for non-small cell lung cancer?

In the near future, the positive results from the INSIGHT study may justify the tepotinib + gefitinib combination becoming the standard treatment for NSCLC in patients with EGFR TKI resistance and MET amplification. The wider use of this combination could improve PFS and OS over current chemotherapy regimens in these patients. However, establishing the optimal sequencing of this combination with other therapies will require more investigation. The tepotinib + gefitinib combination might be effective in treating tumours with less common EGFR mutations. Tepotinib may also provide greater benefits when combined with later generation EGFR TKIs than gefitinib. This approach is currently being investigated in the phase II, open-label, INSIGHT 2 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03940703, planned n=90), in which patients who become resistant to first- to third-generation EGFR TKIs are treated with osimertinib (TAGRISSO®, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK) and tepotinib. Tepotinib in this combination and possibly in others
has the exciting potential to further improve outcomes in specific types of NSCLC.

Article Information:
Disclosure

Y-Long Wu has received grants from Roche; has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Roche, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, and Sanofi and has received nonfinancial support from AstraZeneca.

Compliance With Ethics

This article is an expert interview and does not report on new clinical data or any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Review Process

This is an expert interview and, as such, has not undergone the journal’s standard peer review process.

Authorship

The named author meets the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship of this manuscript, takes responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole and has given final approval for the version to be published.

Correspondence

Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital and Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China. E: [email protected]

Support

No funding was received in the publication of this article.

Received

10 October 2019

References

  1. Griffin R, Ramirez RA. Molecular targets in non-small cell lung cancer. Ochsner J. 2017;17:388–92.
  2. World Health Organisation International Agency for Research of Cancer. Globocan Lung Cancer, 2018. Available at: http://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/15-Lung-fact-sheet.pdf (accessed 2 October 2019).
  3. Han J-Y, Lee JS. Unmet medical needs in the treatment of metastatic non-small cell-lung cancer. Eur Oncol. 2008;4:34–7.
  4. Zappa C, Mousa SA. Non-small cell lung cancer: current treatment and future advances. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2016;5:288–300.
  5. Mo HN, Liu P. Targeting MET in cancer therapy. Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2017;3:148–53.
  6. Reungwetwattana T, Liang Y, Zhu V, et al. The race to target MET exon 14 skipping alterations in non-small cell lung cancer: the why, the how, the who, the unknown, and the inevitable. Lung Cancer. 2017;103:27–37.
  7. Cortot AB, Kherrouche Z, Descarpentries C, et al. Exon 14 deleted MET receptor as a new biomarker and target in cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109: doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw262.
  8. Sierra JR, Tsao MS. c-MET as a potential therapeutic target and biomarker in cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2011;3:S21–35.
  9. Organ SL, Tsao MS. An overview of the c-MET signaling pathway. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2011;3:S7–19.
  10. Van Der Steen N, Giovannetti E, Pauwels P, et al. cMET Exon 14 skipping: from the structure to the clinic. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11:1423–32.
  11. Scagliotti G, von Pawel J, Novello S, et al. Phase III multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of tivantinib (ARQ 197) plus erlotinib versus erlotinib alone in previously treated patients with locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:2667–74.
  12. Spigel DR, Edelman MJ, O’Byrne K, et al. Results from the phase III randomized trial of onartuzumab plus erlotinib versus erlotinib in previously treated stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer: METLung. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:412–20.
  13. Yoshioka H, Azuma K, Yamamoto N, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of erlotinib with or without a c-Met inhibitor tivantinib (ARQ 197) in Asian patients with previously treated stage IIIB/IV nonsquamous nonsmall-cell lung cancer harboring wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor (ATTENTION study). Ann Oncol. 2015;26:2066–72.
  14. Hughes VS, Siemann DW. Failures in preclinical and clinical trials of c-Met inhibitors: evaluation of pathway activity as a promising selection criterion. Oncotarget. 2019;10:184–97.
  15. Bladt F, Faden B, Friese-Hamim M, et al. EMD 1214063 and EMD 1204831 constitute a new class of potent and highly selective c-Met inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:2941–51.
  16. Tucker N. Tepotinib Plus Gefitinib Shows Improved PFS Compared With Chemotherapy in EGFR, MET+ NSCLC in INSIGHT Study Targeted Oncology, 2019. Available at: www.targetedonc.com/news/tepotinib-plus-gefitinib-shows-improved-pfs-compared-with-chemotherapy-in-egfr-met-nsclc-in-insight-study (accessed 5 November 2019).
  17. Wu Y, Cheng Y, Zhou J, et al. Long term outcomes to tepotinib plus gefitinib in patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC and MET dysregulation: 18 month follow up. Presented at the World Conference on Lung Cancer, Barcelona, Spain, 7–10 September, 2019. Available at: www.jto.org/article/S1556-0864(19)31254-7/ abstract (accessed 11 November 2019).

Further Resources

Share this Article
Related Content In Lung Cancer
  • Copied to clipboard!
    accredited arrow-downarrow_leftarrow-right-bluearrow-right-dark-bluearrow-right-greyarrow-right-orangearrow-right-whitearrow-right-blueavatarcalendarchevron-down crosscrossdownloademailexclaimationfeedbackfiltergraph-arrowinterviewslinkmenumore_dots padlock person play_buttonplay-colour-tmcplay-colourAsset 1podcastprinter scenerysearch share social_facebooksocial_googleplussocial_instagramsocial_linkedin_altsocial_linkedin_altsocial_pinterestlogo-twitter-glyph-32social_youtubeshape-star (1)tick-bluetick-orangetick-whiteticktimetranscriptup-arrowwebinar