Trending Topic

3D Rendered Medical Illustration of The Lungs.
12 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Asrar A Alahmadi, Logan Roof, Claire Verschraegen

Highlights Immunotherapy, especially combinatory immunotherapy, has shown promise with prolonged survival for patients with advanced mesothelioma in the first-line setting (see the sections on ‘Systemic treatment and immunotherapy debut’ and ‘Randomized immunotherapy trials of mesothelioma’). Histology-based therapy is important to consider, with non-epithelioid subtypes responding better to immunotherapy than to chemotherapy (see the section on […]

Carfilzomib—A Selective Proteasome Inhibitor for the Treatment of Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

David S Siegel, Ravi Vij, Ruben Niesvizky
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Published Online: Jun 25th 2012 Oncology & Hematology Review (US), 2012;8(2):106-110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17925/OHR.2012.08.2.106
Select a Section…
1

Abstract

Overview

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell malignancy characterized by overproduction of monoclonal immunoglobulins, hypercalcemia, renal injury, anemia, and osteolytic lesions. Despite markedly improved clinical outcomes since the introduction of first-generation immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors, survival is very short in patients who relapse and are refractory to these therapies. Carfilzomib is a selective proteasome inhibitor currently being developed for the treatment of MM. In clinical studies, carfilzomib has achieved durable responses in relapsed and/or refractory MM and demonstrated acceptable tolerability with minimal peripheral neuropathy and no evidence of cumulative toxicity. Herein we summarize the key clinical data for single-agent carfilzomib in the relapsed and/or refractory disease setting and provide an overview of the current clinical development of the drug, both as monotherapy and in combinations.

Keywords

Multiple myeloma, proteasome inhibitor, relapsed/refractory, selective, safety, tolerability

2

Article

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell malignancy characterized by the overproduction of monoclonal immunoglobulins and the presence of hypercalcemia, renal injury, anemia, osteolytic lesions, and frequent infections.1,2 Other complications include hyperviscosity and amyloidosis.1,2 It is the second most common hematologic malignancy after non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and will represent nearly 15 % of new hematologic malignancies diagnosed in 2012 in the US.3

MM is generally a disease of older individuals;4 the median age at diagnosis is approximately 69 years.5 With the approvals of the newer agents bortezomib, thalidomide, and lenalidomide, the median overall survival (OS) has improved from approximately two years in the late 1970s to 4.4–7.1 years in the decade since 2000.6 However, in patients with relapsed disease that is refractory to the aforementioned agents, the median event-free survival and OS times are five and nine months, respectively.7

A number of factors may influence the course of disease in an individual patient with MM. Advanced age, poor performance status, the presence of specific cytogenetic markers (e.g., deletion 17p, t(4;14)), the presence of immunoglobulin (Ig)A isotype, serum creatinine ≥2 mg/dl, extramedullary disease, and renal insufficiency each independently predict worse outcomes.1,8 Additional items of concern relate to the patient’s treatment history and include prior therapy-associated toxicity and prior stem cell transplant. The newer agents (i.e., bortezomib, thalidomide, and lenalidomide) have distinct toxicity profiles (including myelosuppression, peripheral neuropathy, and venous thromboembolic events [VTEs]),9 and the effective management of adverse events (AEs) associated with these agents is crucial to ensure that patients are able to receive the most effective treatment with minimal need for interruption.

To view the full article in PDF or eBook formats, please click on the icons above.

2

References

  1. Raab MS, Podar K, Breitkreutz I, et al., Multiple myeloma,
    Lancet, 2009;374(9686):324–39.

  2. Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV, Criteria for diagnosis, staging, risk
    stratification and response assessment of multiple myeloma,
    Leukemia, 2009;23(1):3–9.

  3. American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts & Figures 2012, Atlanta,
    Georgia, US: American Cancer Society, 2012.

  4. Bergsagel PL. Epidemiology, etiology, and molecular
    pathogenesis. In: Anderson KC (ed.), Multiple Myeloma, London,
    UK: Remedica, 2003:17–37.

  5. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. (eds), SEER Cancer
    Statistics Review, 1975–2009 (Vintage 2009 Populations),
    Bethesda, Maryland, US: National Cancer Institute, 2012.

  6. Sirohi B, Powles R, Multiple myeloma, Lancet, 2004;
    363(9412):875–87.

  7. Kumar SK, Lee JH, Lahuerta JJ, et al., Risk of progression and
    survival in multiple myeloma relapsing after therapy with
    IMiDs and bortezomib: a multicenter International Myeloma
    Working Group study, Leukemia, 2012;26(1):149–57.

  8. Ludwig H, Durie BG, Bolejack V, et al., Myeloma in patients
    younger than age 50 years presents with more favorable
    features and shows better survival: an analysis of 10 549
    patients from the International Myeloma Working Group, Blood,
    2008;111(8):4039–47.

  9. Lee CK, Barlogie B, Munshi N, et al., DTPACE: an effective,
    novel combination chemotherapy with thalidomide for
    previously treated patients with myeloma, J Clin Oncol,
    2003;21(14):2732–9.

  10. Hanada M, Sugawara K, Kaneta K, et al., Epoxomicin, a new
    antitumor agent of microbial origin, J Antibiot (Tokyo),
    1992;45(11):1746–52.

  11. Kim KB, Myung J, Sin N, Crews CM, Proteasome inhibition by
    the natural products epoxomicin and dihydroeponemycin:
    insights into specificity and potency, Bioorg Med Chem Lett,
    1999;9(23):3335–40.

  12. Meng L, Kwok BH, Sin N, Crews CM., Eponemycin exerts its
    antitumor effect through the inhibition of proteasome
    function, Cancer Res, 1999;59(12):2798–801.

  13. Meng L, Mohan R, Kwok BH, et al., Epoxomicin, a potent and
    selective proteasome inhibitor, exhibits in vivo
    antiinflammatory activity, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
    1999;96(18):10403–8.

  14. Groll M, Kim KB, Kairies N, et al., Crystal structure of
    epoxomicin:20S proteasome reveals a molecular basis for
    selectivity of α’, β’-epoxyketone proteasome inhibitors, J Am Chem Soc, 2000;122(6):1237–8.

  15. Demo SD, Kirk CJ, Aujay MA, et al., Antitumor activity of
    PR-171, a novel irreversible inhibitor of the proteasome,
    Cancer Res, 2007;67(13):6383–91.

  16. Yang J, Wang Z, Fang Y, et al., Pharmacokinetics,
    pharmacodynamics, metabolism, distribution, and excretion of
    carfilzomib in rats, Drug Metab Dispos, 2011;39(10):1873–82.

  17. Kuhn DJ, Chen Q, Voorhees PM, et al., Potent activity of
    carfilzomib, a novel, irreversible inhibitor of the ubiquitinproteasome
    pathway, against preclinical models of multiple
    myeloma, Blood, 2007;110(9):3281–90.

  18. Arastu-Kapur S, Anderl JL, Kraus M, et al., Nonproteasomal
    targets of the proteasome inhibitors bortezomib and
    carfilzomib: a link to clinical adverse events, Clin Cancer Res,
    2011;17(9):2734–43.

  19. O’Connor OA, Stewart AK, Vallone M, et al., A phase 1 dose
    escalation study of the safety and pharmacokinetics of the
    novel proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib (PR-171) in patients
    with hematologic malignancies, Clin Cancer Res,
    2009;15(22):7085–91.

  20. Alsina M, Trudel S, Furman RR, et al., A phase 1 single-agent
    study of twice-weekly consecutive-day dosing of the
    proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib in patients with relapsed or
    refractory multiple myeloma or lymphoma, Clin Cancer Res, 2012
    Jul 3 [Epub ahead of print].

  21. Jagannath S, Vij R, Stewart K, et al., Final results of PX-171-
    003-A0, part 1 of an open-label, single-arm, phase II study
    of carfilzomib (CFZ) in patients (pts) with relapsed and
    refractory multiple myeloma (MM), J Clin Oncol,
    2009;27(15Suppl.):Abstract 8504.

  22. Siegel DS, Martin T, Wang M, et al., A phase 2 study of singleagent
    carfilzomib (PX-171-003-A1) in patients with relapsed
    and refractory multiple myeloma, Blood, 2012 July 25 [Epub
    ahead of print].

  23. Vij R, Wang M, Kaufman JL, et al., An open-label, single-arm,
    phase 2 (PX-171-004) study of single-agent carfilzomib in
    bortezomib-naive patients with relapsed and/or refractory
    multiple myeloma, Blood, 2012;119(24):5661–70.

  24. Niesvizky R, Vij R, Martin T, et al., Carfilzomib
    pharmacokinetics, safety, and activity in patients with relapsed
    or refractory multiple myeloma and renal dysfunction: final
    results, Haematologica, 2011;96(Suppl. 2):370–1.

  25. Vij R, Siegel DS, Jagannath S, et al., An open-label, single-arm,
    phase 2 study of single-agent carfilzomib in patients with
    relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma who have been
    previously treated with bortezomib, Br J Haematol,
    2012; [Epub ahead of print].

  26. Richardson PG, Barlogie B, Berenson J, et al., A phase 2 study
    of bortezomib in relapsed, refractory myeloma, N Engl J Med,
    2003;348(26):2609–17.

  27. Jagannath S, Barlogie B, Berenson J, et al., A phase 2 study of
    two doses of bortezomib in relapsed or refractory myeloma,
    Br J Haematol, 2004;127(2):165–72.

  28. Richardson PG, Sonneveld P, Schuster MW, et al., Bortezomib
    or high-dose dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma,
    N Engl J Med, 2005;352(24):2487–98.

  29. Papadopoulos KP, Lee P, Singhal S, et al., A phase 1b/2 study
    of prolonged infusion carfilzomib in patients with relapsed
    and/or refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma: updated efficacy
    and tolerability from the completed 20/56mg/m2 expansion
    cohort of PX-171-007, Blood, 2011;118(21):Abstract 2930.

  30. Jakubowiak AJ, Dytfeld D, Griffith KA, et al., A phase 1/2 study
    of carfilzomib in combination with lenalidomide and low-dose
    dexamethasone as a frontline treatment for multiple myeloma,
    Blood, 2012; [Epub ahead of print].

  31. Kolb B, Hulin C, Caillot D, et al., Phase I/II study of carfilzomib plus
    melphalan-prednisone (CMP) in elderly patients with de novo
    multiple myeloma, J Clin Oncol, 2012;30(Suppl.):Abstract 8009.

  32. Sonneveld P, Hacker E, Zweegman S, et al., Carfilzomib
    combined with thalidomide and dexamethasone (CARTHADEX)
    as induction treatment prior to high-dose melphalan (HDM) in
    newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma (MM). A trial
    of the European Myeloma Network EMN, Blood,
    2011;118(21):Abstract 633.

  33. Mikhael JR, A phase I/II trial of cyclophosphamide, carfilzomib,
    thalidomide, and dexamethasone (CYCLONE) in patients with
    newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, J Clin Oncol,
    2012;30(15):Abstract 8010.

  34. Hajek R, Single-agent carfilzomib versus a best supportive care
    regimen in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple
    myeloma: FOCUS (PX-171-011), a randomized, open-label,
    phase 3 study, Haematologica, 2012;97(S2):Abstract 1553.

  35. Papadopoulos KP, Lee P, Gordon MS, et al., Updated results of
    a phase 1b/2 study using a 30-min infusion of carfilzomib (CFZ)
    in patients (pts) with relapsed malignancies, Ann Oncol,
    2010;21(Suppl. 8):viii170.

  36. Sadaka B, Alloway RR, Woodle ES, Clinical and investigational
    use of proteasome inhibitors for transplant rejection, Expert
    Opin Investig Drugs, 2011;20(11):1535–42.

  37. Singhal S, Siegel DS, Martin T, et al., Integrated safety from
    phase 2 studies of monotherapy carfilzomib in patients with
    relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM): an updated
    analysis, Blood, 2011;118(21):Abstract 1876.

3

Article Information

Disclosure

David S Siegel, MD, PhD, has been consultant for, received honoraria from, and served as a Board of Directors or Advisory Committee member for Millennium and Celgene. Ravi Vij, MD, has been on the speakers bureau for Celgene and Millennium, served on advisory boards for Celgene and Onyx, and received research support from Onyx and Celgene. Ruben Niesvizky, MD, has had research supported by Celgene, Millennium, and Onyx, been on the speakers bureau for Celgene and Millennium, and served as consultant for Celgene, Millennium, and Onyx.

Support

The studies described in this article were supported by Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Received

2012-06-29T00:00:00

4

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Close Popup