Trending Topic

3D Rendered Medical Illustration of Male Anatomy - Colon Cancer; Ascending Colon.
17 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked

Rat sarcoma virus (RAS) proteins are a family of prototypical oncogenes frequently mutated in human cancers. Mutations in the RAS gene account for 19% of all pathogenic alterations and are the subject of extensive research in molecular and clinical oncology.1 The RAS family consists of three major isoforms, namely the Harvey rat sarcoma virus (HRAS), the neuroblastoma RAS […]

Snake Venom and Haemostasis – An Overview

Rojnuckarin Ponlapat
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Published Online: Aug 22nd 2011 European Haematology, 2008;2(1):7-11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17925/EOH.2008.02.1.7
Select a Section…
1

Article

Venomous snakebites are still a public health problem in tropical countries. Even in metropolitan areas, such as Bangkok, green pit viper (Cryptelytrops albolabris and C. macrops) bites are still prevalent. As we are invading their territory, they adapt to live among humans in our backyards. With some exceptions, clinical syndromes of snakebites can be divided simply into two classes: elapid envenomation attacks neuromuscular junctions, causing muscular paralysis; viper envenomation targets the haemostatic system, resulting in bleeding disorders. Therefore, viper venoms are of great interest to haematologists. Vipers (Viperinae) are members of the snake family that develops the most advanced venom-injecting organs, the long sheathed fangs that can be folded like switchblades. Some vipers possess pit organs, infrared detectors for locating warm-blooded prey in the dark. This specialised subfamily is termed crotalidae (Pit viper), separating them from viperidae (True viper). Vipers found in the Americas are pit vipers, while African vipers are true vipers. Asia and Europe are homes to both subfamilies.

Viper Bites

Clinically, viper bites cause both local tissue damage and systemic effects: local tissue swelling, blisters from dermo-epidermal separation, ecchymoses and gangrene. Snake venom metalloprotease (SVMPs) have been implicated in these tissue injuries, both directly and indirectly via vascular damage1 and inflammatory responses.2 The most prominent systemic effects of pit viper venoms are towards fibrinogen and platelets. Although the venoms clot fibrinogen (thrombin-like effect) and activate platelets in vitro, these friable clots and platelet aggregates are rapidly cleared from circulation in vivo, resulting in hypofibrinogenaemia, termed defibrination syndrome, and thrombocytopenia.3 On the other hand, true vipers, such as Russell’s viper and Daboia russelii, activate common pathways of coagulation via factor X and V, causing bleeding from disseminated intravascular coagulation. Kinetics studies in humans showed that the viper venom is rapidly absorbed. However, the effects on blood may be delayed and prolonged as the half-life of viper venoms is over 24 hours.4 Antivenoms, the specific treatment of venomous snakebites, are polyclonal antibodies derived from horses or sheep. Older versions of antivenoms may cause potentially fatal early reactions mediated by complement activation from the immunoglobulin (Ig)-G (fragment, crystallisable) Fc portion.5,6 Current F (ab)’2 antivenoms in Thailand, the products of Queen Saovabha Memorial Institute, are pure and devoid of the Fc portion. A study revealed that the incidence of reactions is low (3.5%) and unpredictable by the intradermal test.7 Therefore, a hypersensitivity skin test for immunoglobulin (Ig)-E-mediated reactions is unnecessary, but close observation is essential during administration in all patients. Although antivenoms are efficacious in reversing coagulopathy and thrombocytopenia from viper venoms, this efficacy in treating local tissue injuries is limited.8,9 This is consistent with animal studies showing that venom-induced local damages was rapid, and unable to be treated even by immediate antivenom.10 Therefore, local tissue injury is the current management problem after snakebites, and further research is needed.

Viper Venoms

The significance of viper venoms goes far beyond the tropical medicine discipline. Different snake venoms have been found to affect almost all components of the haemostatic system, including the vascular wall, platelets, clotting factors, clotting inhibitors and fibrinolytic components. In addition, there are effects on a wide variety of physiological and pathological processes, including angiogenesis, inflammation and cancer metastasis. Consequently, snake venoms are rich sources of proteins with potential to be useful diagnostic or therapeutic agents or compounds for studying the molecular mechanisms of haemostasis. Apart from the conventional protein purifications from snake venoms, current molecular biology permits the construction of a complementary DNA (cDNA) library of the expressed genes in venom glands. This provides us with complete and accurate sequences of DNA and conceptually translated proteins to correlate with their functions. Furthermore, cDNA is an unlimited source of pure recombinant proteins that can be used to investigate their therapeutic and/or diagnostic values. Finally, mutagenesis can be performed to study the structure–function relationship and engineer proteins with desirable activities.
The evolutionary origins of venom proteins are from non-toxic genes that are recruited to express in venom glands, the special organs that started developing before snakes phylogenetically branched out from lizards.11 For example, snake venom serine proteases (SVSPs) are from tissue kallikrein, SVMPS/disintegrins are from a disintegrin and metalloproteinase (ADAM) proteins and a prothrombin activator, is from clotting factor X.12 Subsequently, these genes acquired toxic properties following a process known as accelerated evolution.13 After gene duplications and high rates of non-synonymous base substitutions in coding regions, a wide variety of novel functions emerged, greatly expanding the arrays of susceptible prey with enormous geographical and seasonal variations.
Snake venom proteins, like other toxins, are cysteine-rich (CR) peptides.14 In an oxidising extracellular environment most form disulphide bonds. The conserved bonds may be helpful in supporting the original folding structures of proteins during accelerated evolution. On the other hand, alterations of disulphide bond patterns may lead to novel structures and functions enhancing their variety. For example, a loss in a disulphide bond in the disintegrin-like domain of SVMPS resulted in a disintegrin, the integrin-blocking proteins unique to snake venoms.15 In addition, changes in disulphide bonds may cause different forms of post-translational modifications, such as the release of disintegrin domains from the protease domain of SVMPs.15 Furthermore, disulphide bonds can determine the multimeric structures, e.g. dimer versus tetramer, of the venom CLPs. Only the tetramers can cluster platelet receptors, resulting in stronger platelet activation.16 Disulphide bonds also linked two peptides, either in the same family, e.g. a dimeric disintegrin, or different families of proteins, e.g. SVMP and CLPs. These create novel and/or composite functions. Although cysteine bonds may be beneficial for snake venom evolution, they make these proteins difficult to recombinantly express, even in eukaryotic systems.

Snake Venom Serine Proteases

Almost all of the enzymes in coagulation cascade and fibrinolysis are serine proteases characterised by the catalytic triad: serine (S), aspartate (D) and histidine (H). However, most SVSPs are originate from the glandular kallikrein that later evolved to acquire coagulation and fibrinolytic/fibrinogenolytic activities. This may explain hypotensive effects of some enzymes due to the kallikrin-like activity producing kinin. The largest group of venom enzymes in this family is termed ‘thrombin-like’ enzymes due to their activities, not the evolutionary origin.
Thrombin plays pivotal roles in haemostasis.17 The inactive precursor, prothrombin, is composed of the N-terminal domain that is cleaved from the C-terminal catalytic domain or thrombin upon activation. In contrast to factors VII, IX, X, which require their N-terminal domains and co-factors (tissue factor, factor VIII and factor V, respectively) to form proteinase complexes on membrane, thrombin is released freely in solution to perform its myriad functions. The primary function of thrombin is the conversion of fibrinogen to fibrin by cleaving fibrinopeptide A and, subsequently, fibrinopeptide B from Aα and Bβ chains of fibrinogen, respectively. On the fibrin surface, thrombin activates factor XIII, resulting in fibrin cross-link. It also amplifies the positive feedback loops of coagulation by activating factors V, VIII and XI, as well as platelet protease-activated receptor (PAR). The activation of PAR not only stimulates platelet aggregation, but also provides a negatively charged surface, supporting blood coagulation. The activation of factor XI and PAR is dependent on the ability of thrombin to bind platelet glycoprotein (GP) Ib. Furthermore, in the presence of the co-factor thrombomodulin (TM), thrombin activates protein C and thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) to inhibit coagulation (via degradation of factors Va and VIIIa) and fibrinolysis (via digestion of plasminogen activator-binding sites on fibrin), respectively. Molecular mechanisms of the multifunctionality of thrombin have been under extensive investigation. Apart from the active site of thrombin, there are mixed positive charges and hydrophobic patches on both sides of the molecules known as anion-binding exosites I and II (ABE I and ABE II) that confer thrombin substrate specificity (see Figure 1). ABE I is responsible for fibrinogen, factors V, VIII, XI, PAR and TM contacts, while the ABE II binds platelet GPIb and chondroitin sulphate part of TM.18 Thrombin inhibitors may target the ABE I (hirudin) exosite II (heparin and hemadin) or both exosites (Bothrojaracin, a C-type lectin from the snake Bothrops jararaca).
Thrombin-like enzymes are named according to the ability of venom proteases to clot fibrinogen in vitro. Notably, these enzymes do not contain the full effects of thrombin. They most commonly release only fibrinopeptide A, termed venombin A, for example ancrod from the Malayan pit viper, Calloselasma rhodostoma,19 batroxobin from B. atrox20 and GPV-TLs from the green pit viper, C. albolabris;21 or only fibrinopeptide B, termed venombin B, for example contortrixobin from Agkistrodon contortrix,22 or both fibrinopeptides, termed venombin AB, for example bilineobin from A. bilineatus.23 However, bilineobin preferentially cleaves fibrinopeptide B. In addition, factor XIII is not activated, resulting in friable clots subjected to fibrinolysis. Some SVSPs show other activities of thrombin. For example, platelet PAR is activated by PA-BJ from B. jararaca.24 A TM-independent protein C activator, ACCC, was isolated from A. contortrix contortrix,25 and a factor V activator, RVV-V, was purified from Russell’s viper, D. russelii.26 Other SVSPs contain fibrinogenolytic27 and/or plasminogen-activating activities.28
Sequence analysis of thrombin-like SVSPs could not define ABE I and II homologous to thrombin.21 This is not surprising because their functions do not have the same multiplicity and their evolutionary origin is different from that of thrombin. However, parts of molecules, which may be called ‘exosites’, away from the active site are likely to play roles in substrate recognition. Unfortunately, there is no reported high-resolution crystal structure of a fibrinogen-clotting enzyme; only crystallography data of plasminogen activator28 and protein C activator29 are available. Interestingly, the overall structures of these two are similar. Structure– function correlations of SVSPs require further study.
The properties of thrombin-like enzymes have been employed for diagnostic and investigational uses. For example, venombin A and venombin B were used to define the contributions of fibrinopeptide A or B releases in fibrin polymerisation.30 In addition, SVSP from B. atrox (reptilase time) can determine the causes of prolonged thrombin time because the test is unaffected by heparin. The protein C and factor V activators are used for activated protein C resistance and lupus anticoagulant tests, respectively. Furthermore, thrombin-like enzymes have the potential to be therapeutic anticoagulants.31 However, a large randomised trial revealed that ancrod is not better than placebo in the treatment of ischaemic stroke.32

Snake Venom Metalloproteases/Disintegrin

SVMPs are zinc-dependent multidomain proteins. The nascent peptides contain a signal peptide and a pro-sequence that keeps the enzyme inactive. The mature secreted proteins from class P-I comprise only a metalloproteinase domain, while class P-II contains additional disintegrins and P-III class possesses disintegrin-like and CR domains. The disintegrin domains are usually released from the mature proteins. Free disintegrins interfere with cell–matrix interaction via integrin binding, while attached disintegrin-like or disintegrin domains target the enzymes to the sites of actions.33 Several variants of these domain structures have been reported, including attached disintegrin domains, free disintegrin-like domains, homo- or heterodimers and additional heterodimeric CLPs that joined the C-terminus of proteins by disulphide bonds. The prototype of this class is RVV-X, a factor X activator from Russell’s viper.
Apart from tissue damage, some SVMPs can degrade fibrinogen/fibrin.34 Others digest platelet membrane GPs and their ligands, e.g. GPIb, von Willebrand factor (vWF), collagen and P-selectin GP ligand-1 (PSGL-1). Interestingly, alborrhagin from C. albolabris35 activates the collagen receptor GPVI, causing platelet activation. Furthermore, the SVMPs with lectin subunits can activate prothrombin (Ecarin from saw-scaled viper, Echis carinatus)36 or factor X (RVV-X from D. Russelii). The crystal structure showed that the lectin domain bound the γ-carboxyglutamic acid (Gla) domain of factor X facilitating the action.37
The coagulation factor activators have been used as the diagnostic tools. The prothrombin activator is used to monitor thrombin inhibitor therapy (Ecarin time) and factor X activator to assay for lupus anticoagulant. Furthermore, the modified fibrinogenolytic enzyme alfimeprase has been used successfully as a direct thrombolytic agent for peripheral arterial occlusion in an animal model.38 The advantage of this agent is its rapid onset of action and neutralisability by plasma α2 macroglobulin.39 Unfortunately, phase III clinical trials failed to prove its benefit over standard treatment for acute arterial thrombosis or catheter occlusion.
Disintegrins are venom-derived low-molecular-weight peptides that bind and block integrins. Integrins are cell-surface proteins mediating interactions between cells and extracellular matrices or other cells. They are essential for cell survival, proliferation, differentiation and/or activation. Integrins comprise two transmembrane subunits, α and β. Permutations of the two create a variety of receptors with distinct ligand specificities and functions. The most important integrin in haematology is the platelet αIIBβ3 (GPIIb/IIIa), the major fibrinogen receptor-mediating platelet aggregation. The main feature of disintegrins is the tri-peptide motif that binds integrins including the archetypical RGD or KGD or other variants, WGD, VGD, MGD, MLD, RTS and KTS. The sequences of and around this motif, as well as of the C-terminal tails, determine the integrin-binding specificity.40–42 Although data suggested that KGD conferred disintegrin specificity to GPIIb/IIIa, we found that the KGD-containing albolatin disintegrin inhibited only collagen-induced, not ADP-induced, platelet aggregation.43 The structures of disintegrins showed the integrin-binding motif on the tip of a loop with the C-terminal tail nearby (see Figure 2).44 In contrast to integrins, disintegrin-like domains do not contain this motif and usually attach to a CR domain. Crystallographic data disclose that the conformations of disintegrin-like domains are totally different from disintegrins and the XCD motif in the proteins do not bind integrins, as previously hypothesised.45 Notably, the disintrigin-like and CR domains form a C-shaped structure connecting to the terminal hypervariable region (HVR) that binds specifically to the substrates (see Figure 3).
The most prominent action of RGD, KGD or WGD disintegrins is platelet inhibition. Furthermore, some disintegrins contain anticancer activities by inhibiting integrin-dependent tumour cell migration, metastasis and angiogenesis.46 For example, rhodostomin from C. rhodostoma, trigramin from Trimeresurus flavoviridis and albolabrin from C. albolabris can inhibit cancer cell invasion in an animal model.47 Contortrostatin, a homodimeric RGD-disintegrin from A. contortrix contortrix, induces vascular apoptosis and inhibits angiogenesis.48
Eptifibatide, a derivative of the disintegrin barbourin, is now available as an antiplatelet for coronary diseases.49 In addition, contortrostatin was shown to block breast cancer growth in a mouse model. The preparation was packed in liposome to evade immune system and platelets and to increase half-life.50

C-type Lectin-like Proteins

CLPs are evolved from a large family of the C-type lectins that widely express from microbes to humans.51 However, CLP are neither C-type (calcium-dependent) nor lectin (carbohydrate-binding) proteins.52 The basic building block of CLPs is a heterodimer of a subunit a (α chain) of 14–15kDa and a subunit b (β chain) of 13–14kDa linked by inter-chain disulphide bond. CLP complexes may be αβ, (αβ)2, (αβ)4 or α1α2β1β2.53–55 X-ray crystallography revealed the domain swap between an αβ dimer providing a concave surface for binding to various target proteins.56 The structure of higher multimer of αβ dimer has also been solved (see Figure 4).57
Anticoagulant CLPs bind the Gla domain of clotting factor IX and/or X in the presence of Ca2+.58 Other targets of CLPs are platelet GPIb and/or GPVI or vWF. The GPIb-binding CLPs can cause either platelet agglutination or inhibition in vitro depending on the stoichiometry of bindings.59 However, the affinity of binding is probably lower than vWF, resulting in competitive inhibition in vivo. Some CLPs are disulphide-linked higher multimers and bind GPVI, with or without GPIb-activating signal transduction in platelets. Higher multimer has been implicated in receptor clustering and, thus, activation.16 Examples are alboaggregin A (α1α2β1β2) and alboluxin ((αβ)3), which activate GPVI and GPIb,60,61 while convulxin (αβ)4 bind GPVI and GPIa/IIa, another collagen receptor. In contrast, stejnulxin62 and trowaglerix can activate only GPVI, whereby trowaglerix also causes subsequent GPVI shedding and later platelet inhibition.63 Furthermore, dimeric botrocetin and bitiscetin target vWF and/or GPIb, enhancing their interaction.64 Finally, bothrojaracin, the (pro)thrombin exosite binder, demonstrates a novel mechanism of anticoagulation.
Platelet-targeting CLPs are used to dissect the mechanisms of platelet activation mediated by each GP receptor. In addition, bothrojaracin could treat a rat model of thrombosis.65

Phospholipases A2

The enzymes originating from extracellular phospholipase A2 (PLA2) are animal enzymes that help gastrointestinal digestion and mediate inflammatory and antimicrobial activities.66 The anticoagulant properties have been reported in snake venom PLA2 and are independent of phospholipase activity. The mechanism is likely to be direct binding, hence inhibiting the activated clotting factor Xa or prothrombinase complex.67 PLA2 that binds vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor, promoting angiogenesis, has been reported.68

Perspectives

Snake-venom proteins are proven useful tools for diagnosis and investigation as they affect almost all aspects of the haemostatic system. However, therapeutic applications of venom derivatives are limited by potential immunogenicity and the parenteral route of administration, making them unsuitable for repeated treatments. In addition, they have to compete with a lot of efficient and safe antithrombotics and anticancer treatments on the market or in development. Identification of diseases or patient subgroups without effective remedies, employment of venom components to study pathogenesis and, then, production of small molecular mimetics as treatments may be the way of drug discovery in the future. ■

1

References

  1. Gutiérrez JM, Rucavado A, Escalante T, Díaz C, Hemorrhage induced by snake venom metalloproteinases: biochemical and biophysical mechanisms involved in microvessel damage, Toxicon, 2005;45:997–1011.
  2. Laing GD, Clissa PB, Theakston RD, et al., Inflammatory pathogenesis of snake venom metalloproteinase-induced skin necrosis, Eur J Immunol, 2003;33:3458–63.
  3. Rojnuckarin P, Intragumtornchai T, Sattapiboon R, et al., The effects of green pit viper (Trimeresurus albolabris and Trimeresurus macrops) venom on the fibrinolytic system in human, Toxicon, 1999;37:743–55.
  4. Rojnuckarin P, Banjongkit S, Chantawibun W, et al., Green pit viper (Trimeresurus albolabris and T. macrops) venom antigenaemia and kinetics in humans, Trop Doct, 2007;37: 207–10.
  5. Malasit P, Warrell DA, Chanthavanich P, et al., Prediction, prevention, and mechanism of early (anaphylactic) antivenom reactions in victims of snake bites, Br Med J (Clin Res Ed), 1986; 292:17–20.
  6. Rojnuckarin P, Mahasandana S, Intragumthornchai T, et al., Prognostic factors of green pit viper bites, Am J Trop Med Hyg, 1998;58:22–5.
  7. Thiansookon A, Rojnuckarin P, Low incidence of early reactions to horse-derived F(ab’)(2) antivenom for snakebites in Thailand, Acta Trop, 2008;105:203–5.
  8. Rojnuckarin P, Chanthawibun W, Noiphrom J, et al., A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of antivenom for local effects of green pit viper bites, Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg, 2006;100:879–84.
  9. Chotenimitkhun R, Rojnuckarin P, Systemic antivenom and skin necrosis after green pit viper bites, Clin Toxicol (Phila), 2008; 46:122–5.
  10. Gutiérrez JM, León G, Rojas G, et al., Neutralization of local tissue damage induced by Bothrops asper (terciopelo) snake venom, Toxicon, 1998;36:1529–38.
  11. Fry BG, Vidal N, Norman JA, et al., Early evolution of the venom system in lizards and snakes, Nature, 2006;439:584–8.
  12. Reza MA, Swarup S, Kini RM, Structure of two genes encoding parallel prothrombin activators in Tropidechis carinatus snake: gene duplication and recruitment of factor X gene to the venom gland, J Thromb Haemost, 2007;5:117–26.
  13. Nakashima K, Nobuhisa I, Deshimaru M, et al., Accelerated evolution in the protein-coding regions is universal in crotalinae snake venom gland phospholipase A2 isozyme genes, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1995;92:5605–9.
  14. Hartig GR, Tran TT, Smythe ML, Intramolecular disulphide bond arrangements in nonhomologous proteins, Protein Sci, 2005;14: 474–82.
  15. Fox JW, Serrano SM, Insights into and speculations about snake venom metalloproteinase (SVMP) synthesis, folding and disulfide bond formation and their contribution to venom complexity, FEBS J, 2008;275:3016–30.
  16. Navdaev A, Dörmann D, Clemetson JM, Clemetson KJ, Echicetin, a GPIb-binding snake C-type lectin from Echis carinatus, also contains a binding site for IgMkappa responsible for platelet agglutination in plasma and inducing signal transduction, Blood, 2001;97:2333–41.
  17. Crawley JT, Zanardelli S, Chion CK, Lane DA, The central role of thrombin in hemostasis, J Thromb Haemost, 2007;5(Suppl. 1): 95–101.
  18. Huntington JA, Molecular recognition mechanisms of thrombin, J Thromb Haemost, 2005;3:1861–72.
  19. Au LC, Lin SB, Chou JS, et al., Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of the cDNA for ancrod, a thrombin-like enzyme from the venom of Calloselasma rhodostoma, Biochem J, 1993;294: 387–90.
  20. Itoh N, Tanaka N, Mihashi S, Yamashina I, Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of cDNA for batroxobin, a thrombin-like snake venom enzyme, J Biol Chem, 1987;262:3132–5.
  21. Rojnuckarin P, Muanpasitporn C, Chanhome L, et al., Molecular cloning of novel serine proteases and phospholipases A2 from green pit viper (Trimeresurus albolabris) venom gland cDNA library, Toxicon, 2006;47:279–87.
  22. Amiconi G, Amoresano A, Boumis G, et al., A novel venombin B from Agkistrodon contortrix contortrix: evidence for recognition properties in the surface around the primary specificity pocket different from thrombin, Biochemistry, 2000; 39:10294–10308.
  23. Komori Y, Nikai T, Ohara A, et al., Effect of bilineobin, a thrombin-like proteinase from the venom of common cantil (Agkistrodon bilineatus), Toxicon, 1993;31:257–70.
  24. Serrano SM, Mentele R, Sampaio CA, Fink E, Purification, characterization, and amino acid sequence of a serine proteinase, PA-BJ, with platelet-aggregating activity from the venom of Bothrops jararaca, Biochemistry, 1995;34:7186–93.
  25. Kisiel W, Kondo S, Smith KJ, et al., Characterization of a protein C activator from Agkistrodon contortrix contortrix venom, J Biol Chem, 1987;262:12607–13.
  26. Tokunaga F, Nagasawa K, Tamura S, et al., The factor V-activating enzyme (RVV-V) from Russell’s viper venom. Identification of isoproteins RVV-V alpha, -V beta, and -V gamma and their complete amino acid sequences, J Biol Chem, 1988;263:17471–81.
  27. Muanpasitporn C, Rojnuckarin P, Expression and characterization of a recombinant fibrinogenolytic serine protease from green pit viper (Trimeresurus albolabris) venom, Toxicon, 2007;49:1083–9.
  28. Parry MA, Jacob U, Huber R, et al., The crystal structure of the novel snake venom plasminogen activator TSV-PA: a prototype structure for snake venom serine proteinases, Structure, 1998; 6:1195–1206.
  29. Murakami MT, Arni RK, Thrombomodulin-independent activation of protein C and specificity of hemostatically active snake venom serine proteinases: crystal structures of native and inhibited Agkistrodon contortrix contortrix protein C activator, J Biol Chem, 2005;280:39309–15.
  30. Weisel JW, Which knobs fit into which holes in fibrin polymerization?, J Thromb Haemost, 2007;5:2340–43.
  31. Guo Y, Zuo YF, Wang QZ, et al., Meta-analysis of defibrase in treatment of acute cerebral infarction, Chin Med J (Engl), 2006; 119:662–8.
  32. Hennerici MG, Kay R, Bogousslavsky J, et al., ESTAT investigators, Intravenous ancrod for acute ischaemic stroke in the European Stroke Treatment with Ancrod Trial: a randomised controlled trial, Lancet, 2006;368:1871–8.
  33. Laing GD, Moura-da-Silva AM, Jararhagin and its multiple effects on hemostasis, Toxicon, 2005;45:987–96.
  34. Guan AL, Retzios AD, Henderson GN, Markland FS Jr, Purification and characterization of a fibrinolytic enzyme from venom of the southern copperhead snake (Agkistrodon contortrix contortrix), Arch Biochem Biophys, 1991;289: 197–207.
  35. Andrews RK, Gardiner EE, Asazuma N, et al., A novel viper venom metalloproteinase, alborhagin, is an agonist at the platelet collagen receptor GPVI, J Biol Chem, 2001;276: 28092–7.
  36. Nishida S, Fujita T, Kohno N, et al., cDNA cloning and deduced amino acid sequence of prothrombin activator (ecarin) from Kenyan Echis carinatus venom, Biochemistry, 1995;34:1771–8.
  37. Takeda S, Igarashi T, Mori H, Crystal structure of RVV-X: an example of evolutionary gain of specificity by ADAM proteinases, FEBS Lett, 2007;581:5859–64.
  38. Toombs CF, Alfimeprase: pharmacology of a novel fibrinolytic metalloproteinase for thrombolysis, Haemostasis, 2001;31: 141–7.
  39. Swenson S, Markland FS Jr, Snake venom fibrin(ogen)olytic enzymes, Toxicon, 2005;45:1021–39.
  40. Scarborough RM, Rose JW, Hsu MA, et al., Barbourin. A GPIIb- IIIa-specific integrin antagonist from the venom of Sistrurus m. barbouri, J Biol Chem, 1991;266:9359–62.
  41. Suehiro K, Smith JW, Plow EF, The ligand recognition specificity of beta3 integrins, J Biol Chem, 1996;271:10365–71.
  42. Marcinkiewicz C, Vijay-Kumar S, McLane MA, Niewiarowski S, Significance of RGD loop and C-terminal domain of echistatin for recognition of alphaIIb beta3 and alpha(v) beta3 integrins and expression of ligand-induced binding site, Blood, 1997;90: 1565–75.
  43. Singhamatr P, Rojnuckarin P, Molecular cloning of albolatin, a novel snake venom metalloprotease from green pit viper (Trimeresurus albolabris), and expression of its disintegrin domain, Toxicon, 2007;50:1192–1200.
  44. Calvete JJ, Marcinkiewicz C, Monleón D, et al., Snake venom disintegrins: evolution of structure and function, Toxicon, 2005; 45:1063–74.
  45. Takeda S, Igarashi T, Mori H, Araki S, Crystal structures of VAP1 reveal ADAMs’ MDC domain architecture and its unique Cshaped scaffold, EMBO J, 2006;25:2388–96.
  46. Calvete JJ, Marcinkiewicz C, Sanz L, KTS and RTS-disintegrins: anti-angiogenic viper venom peptides specifically targeting the alpha 1 beta 1 integrin, Curr Pharm Des, 2007;13:2853–9.
  47. Yang RS, Tang CH, Chuang WJ, et al., Inhibition of tumor formation by snake venom disintegrin, Toxicon, 2005;45: 661–9.
  48. Zhou Q, Nakada MT, Arnold C, et al., Contortrostatin, a dimeric disintegrin from Agkistrodon contortrix contortrix, inhibits angiogenesis, Angiogenesis, 1999;3:259–69.
  49. The PURSUIT Trial Investigators. Inhibition of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa with eptifibatide in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The PURSUIT Trial Investigators. Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy, N Engl J Med, 1998;339:436–43.
  50. Swenson S, Ramu S, Markland FS, Anti-angiogenesis and RGDcontaining snake venom disintegrins, Curr Pharm Des, 2007;13: 2860–71.
  51. Zelensky AN, Gready JE, The C-type lectin-like domain superfamily, FEBS J, 2005;272:6179–217.
  52. Morita T, C-type lectin-related proteins from snake venoms, Curr Drug Targets Cardiovasc Haematol Disord, 2004;4:357–73.
  53. Atoda H, Hyuga M, Morita T, The primary structure of coagulation factor IX/factor X-binding protein isolated from the venom of Trimeresurus flavoviridis. Homology with asialoglycoprotein receptors, proteoglycan core protein, tetranectin, and lymphocyte Fc epsilon receptor for immunoglobulin E, J Biol Chem, 1991;266:14903–11.
  54. Kowalska MA, Tan L, Holt JC, et al., Alboaggregins A and B. Structure and interaction with human platelets, Thromb Haemost, 1998;79:609–13.
  55. Murakami MT, Zela SP, Gava LM, et al., Crystal structure of the platelet activator convulxin, a disulfide-linked alpha4beta4 cyclic tetramer from the venom of Crotalus durissus terrificus, Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2003;310:478–82.
  56. Morita T, Structures and functions of snake venom CLPs (C-type lectin-like proteins) with anticoagulant-, procoagulant-, and platelet-modulating activities, Toxicon, 2005;45:1099–1114.
  57. Fukuda K, Mizuno H, Atoda H, Morita T, Crystal structure of flavocetin-A, a platelet glycoprotein Ib-binding protein, reveals a novel cyclic tetramer of C-type lectin-like heterodimers, Biochemistry, 2000;39:1915–23.
  58. Atoda H, Ishikawa M, Mizuno H, Morita T, Coagulation factor Xbinding protein from Deinagkistrodon acutus venom is a Gla domain-binding protein, Biochemistry, 1998;37:17361–70.
  59. Arpijuntarangkoon J, Rojnuckarin P, Muanpasitporn C, et al., Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of alboaggregin B, Platelets, 2007;18:266–72.
  60. Dörmann D, Clemetson JM, Navdaev A, et al., Alboaggregin A activates platelets by a mechanism involving glycoprotein VI as well as glycoprotein Ib, Blood, 2001;97:929–36.
  61. Du Xiao-Yan, Magnenat E, Wells TN, Clemetson KJ, Alboluxin, a snake C-type lectin from Trimeresurus albolabris venom is a potent platelet agonist acting via GPIb and GPVI, Thromb Haemost, 2002;87:692–8.
  62. Lee WH, Du XY, Lu QM, et al., Stejnulxin, a novel snake C-type lectin-like protein from Trimeresurus stejnegeri venom is a potent platelet agonist acting specifically via GPVI, Thromb Haemost, 2003;90:662–71.
  63. Chang CH, Chung CH, Kuo HL, et al., The highly specific platelet glycoprotein (GP) VI agonist trowaglerix impaired collageninduced platelet aggregation ex vivo through matrix metalloproteinase-dependent GPVI shedding, J Thromb Haemost, 2008;6:669–76.
  64. Maita N, Nishio K, Nishimoto E, et al., Crystal structure of von Willebrand factor A1 domain complexed with snake venom, bitiscetin: insight into glycoprotein Ibalpha binding mechanism induced by snake venom proteins, J Biol Chem, 2003;278: 37777–81.
  65. Zingali RB, Ferreira MS, Assafim M, et al., Bothrojaracin, a Bothrops jararaca snake venom-derived (pro)thrombin inhibitor, as an anti-thrombotic molecule, Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb, 2005;34:160–63.
  66. Nevalainen TJ, Graham GG, Scott KF, Antibacterial actions of secreted phospholipases A2, Biochim Biophys Acta, 2008;1781: 1–9.
  67. Kini RM, Structure-function relationships and mechanism of anticoagulant phospholipase A2 enzymes from snake venoms, Toxicon, 2005;45:1147–61.
  68. Fujisawa D, Yamazaki Y, Lomonte B, Morita T, Catalytically inactive phospholipase A2 homologue binds to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 via a C-terminal loop region, Biochem J, 2008;411:515–22.
2

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Close Popup